Originally Posted by Jim_Conrad
Originally Posted by JamesJr
Originally Posted by wabigoon
Which way Jim, I'm talking 80 to the land owner, 20 for the farmer.




That's ridiculous........surely it's the other way around, or else the landowner is furnishing everything, except the labor.


You would do better than that custom farming the place.


Many moons ago, I knew a landowner who thought the farmer that was working his place was making too much money, so he decided he'd furnish everything, hire the farmer to do the work, and get all the money off the crop for himself. The farmer said that he liked the arrangement, because he made more money doing that then he did by working the place.