Originally Posted by The_Big_Game_Hunter
Originally Posted by prm
3.5-10x40 vs. 2.5-8x36

Eyebox ease of use, any difference?

Lowlight, any real difference?

I have a rifle that needs a set and forget scope. I owned a VX3 2.5-8 many years ago. Not sure if the VX3i is changed. I rarely shoot far while hunting. I do climb steep mountains and have a very strong dislike for heavy rifles. Also considering FXII and FX3 6x but they are stuck with that nearly useless wide duplex reticle. Prefer to avoid additional cost of custom shop order.

For what it's worth, I currently own a Leupold VX-3i 3.5-10x40mm and it's a great scope. That being said, the 2.5-8x is about an ounce lighter. I do a lot of hunting in relatively open areas and I haven't taken a shot on a big game animal inside 200 yards in years. Since you do a lot of climbing and want a really light rifle, I recommend going with the 2.5-8x then. I'm sure it will still treat you well.


Wow! an ounce lighter, a whole ounce?


Imagine a corporate oligarchy so effective, so advanced and fine tuned that its citizens still call it a democracy.