..squawk_squawk_aquawk...i'm a pea brain parrot...I repeat what I hear...without a thought of my own...squawk_squawk_aquawk...
Makes even more sense.
And no, I'm not a righteous Republican. Again, you're not using critical thinking before posting. If you had, you'd have understood that: 1) the article shows ways in which both sides of the political spectrum are being played and 2) I pointed this out to you.
As for who I vote for, well I vote for the candidate that is more likely to populate the Supreme Court with justices that are less likely to veer away from the constitution as written, except in instances where a new interpretation will guarantee the people have more rights protected rather than less. If that person is in other ways imperfect, well so be it. Not that I'm Christian, but "let he who is without sin cast the first stone" is a pretty good rule for life.
