Remington has made the same mistakes GM made with cars. They think they have to cover all bases of firearms so they bought Marlin for lever actions, produced ARs, Produced 1911, produced countless bolt gun styles, produced Zastava 98 to corner a CRF action, produce over-under shotguns, produce a multitude of pump and autoloader shotguns, produce law enforcement and military grade weapons, produce ammunition and brass, carry a custom shop, etc. They need to reduce all their line and go back to a simple line of 700 turn bolt rifles and shotguns at a competitive price and concentrate on affordable offerings strictly geared to hunters.
Might I ask that you stop using that terminology?
Or at least provide us with your definition of the term?
Would the latest pistol accepted by our military, and obtainable in civilian clothes, be considered "military grade weapons"
English words matter.
