They're testing 100x more people than in any other epidemic but finding that 40% of the positives don't get sick. They have no way of comparing the number of unsick positives to those in previous epidemics. That 40% of unsick people is either people whose bodies are successfully fighting it off or they're faulty testing. Either way, they're falsely using the test results to compare to actually sick people in previous epidemics. It's bad data, false statistics.
