It's gotten to the point that I don't think people on the right care if the left burns leftist cities.
I don't.
I consider it karma for Sherman's march to the sea.
I'm an American.
Those cities are American.
Just because they are like a weird uncle that gets stupid drunk and embarrasses
me, I don't believe we should allow a globalist subversive movement to beat them up.
200 years ago our Navy kicked the crap out of some pirates that were
causing trouble for our people on the other side of the globe.
20 years later President Monroe laid out a doctrine that said we would not
stand for European interference in our hemisphere, and that has been our
policy ever since. It's why we fought communists in Central and South America
for years. By extension it applies to Korea and Vietnam. All to keep the
Reds from gaining ground and employing an "Island Hopping" campaign to
control the world.
Make no mistake, we should not let a violent force control any inch of Ameican
property. Even if we don't like most of the people there.
Berkeley may have been a seed. Maybe New Haven Ct. 100 years ago?
Don't matter.
Let Cali. go?
Portland, Seattle, NYC?
What about Austin, Madison, Asheville, Nashville, Memphis
Missoula, Anchorage, Louisville?
Don't think for a moment we can let a couple Northwest cities "go" and it ends.
If we let Lexington, Louisville, Nashville, then Cincinnati go, where will your little
slice of heaven be.
