Of course they did. Just as they can not refrain from putting "bogus", "unfounded", "unproven" "debunked" and like adjectives in front of any allegations (or statements of fact, for that matter) that Trump says.
Unbiased reporting would not use those adjectives, as they are only purgitive opinion of the scumbag reporter or editor, designed entirely to influence opinions of undiscerning readers, not report the fact and let reader decide.. "Allegation" is an unproven , as yet, statement in itself. Doesn't need any additional spin.
OK - here is an example:
While there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud, Trump and his campaign have been pushing baseless and false conspiracy theories that the election was rigged against him.
Last edited by las; 01/06/21.
