Originally Posted by JimFromTN
What is ironic is that they point out that in order for science to work, there has to be an exchange of ideas when they were cherry picked because they supported DeSantis's approach to the pandemic. It wasn't about discussing ideas. It was about them telling DeSantis that he did a great job. If they wanted a real discussion then they would have chosen medical professionals with opposing views.


I've read most of your past posts. You have the credibility of CDT and faucial.... or less, if that is possible. Unlike MSM, however, Rick allows most anyone to post their opinion, no matter how faulty.

As it should be.

You seem to have missed the point entirely- Google should not be cherry picking opinion that they publish. It is not about who was on the panel at all.

Typical.


The only true cost of having a dog is its death.