Riddle me this: what can u kill with a 6.5 Creedmoor than you can’t with a time-honored and proven (think Jack O’Conner) .270 Winchester? The .270 Winchester has a slight edge over the 6.5 Creedmoor ballistically. IMO, the .270 has a huge advantage over the 6.5 as relates to effectiveness on game at longer ranges. IMAO, the 6.5 Creedmoor adherents are part of uninformed, fad-following, social-media-addicted newbies to long-range hunting
I call BS on this statement.... how about posting some ballistics charts that prove me wrong... comparable bullets, comparable ranges out to say, 700 yards, etc....
