I wish to do so, as well.
In a recent article in Handloader magazine, one of our more popular scribes refers to hydrostatic shock. To wit:

Quote
We've been told for decades that extra speed always results in extra "killing power," whether through more foot-pounds of kinetic energyor high velocity's Holy Grail, hydrostatic shock.


Isn't the use of the term "hydrostatic" technically incorrect? The term would seem to imply liquid under pressure, but at rest; ie.,not moving. What is referred to, in this instance might me more correctly phrased as "hydrodynamic shock." This implies liquid, under pressure, GOING somewhere, and DOING something. This is what is happening. Shouldn't we all strive to be more technically, if not politically, correct?

P.S. John,
You see just how ridiculous this can get???????
Ya just can't make everyone happy! Even when you do, someone will get PO'ed about that! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/confused.gif" alt="" />..................Bug.