Yes, E I'm sure I have not understood things on many different topics. On this particular topic I was sure he didn't but gave you the benefit of the doubt and asked him. In fairness to you, I don't hunt in hot climates like you do so maybe going above and beyond makes sense for your conditions. For me, it is totally unnecessary and I believe that the test you are performing puts undue stress on a scope. That's just my opinion.
I think that using filler gases with larger molecules as an improvement is a good thing and I applaud Leupold for doing the R&D. Sorry I jumped on your back like that. I'll try to behave in the future.
