Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Ask The Gunwriters .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger

Print Thread

Hop To

Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger Calif. Hunter #5508299 08/10/11
Joined: Jul 2007 Posts: 5,173 Washington - dry side G GuyM Campfire Tracker
GuyM Campfire Tracker G Joined: Jul 2007 Posts: 5,173 Washington - dry side	Haven't ever tried the .20 Practical, but can see my hits just fine with the .204 Ruger. Great little cartridge - and no need to load it down...

GB1

Entire Thread
Title	Posted By	Posted
.20 Practical vs .204 Ruger	Calif. Hunter	08/10/11
Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger	GuyM	08/10/11
Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger	GreatWaputi	08/10/11
Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger	ipopum	08/10/11
Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger	mjbgalt	08/10/11
Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger	Mule Deer	08/10/11
Re: .20 Practical vs .204 Ruger	ipopum	08/17/11

Moderated by RickBin

Link Copied to Clipboard

AX24

85 members (6MMWASP, 260Remguy, 257_X_50, 450yukon, 79S, 300_savage, 12 invisible), 1,628 guests, and 927 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

April
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
	1	2	3	4	5	6
7	8	9	10	11	12	13
14	15	16	17	18	19	20
21	22	23	24	25	26	27
28	29	30

Forum Statistics

Forums81

Topics1,191,757

Posts18,476,385

Members73,942

Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023

Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.108s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7992 MB (Peak: 0.8246 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-29 07:09:55 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS