Originally Posted by Barak
you're the one around here who's failing to perceive the distinction between mala prohibita and mala in se. And that distinction isn't even a matter of degree. Not sure I'd bring up that argument if I were you.


Perhaps the argument could be made that drugs are mala in se from my vantage point it would definitely qualify. A material that is injested that steals reasoning and holds a person against their will, causing them to commit acts that are evil? If that isn't wrong in itself and prohibits peaceful reasonable interaction between member of society I don't know what is.

I'm on the libertarian wagon but jump off when it comes to drugs.