Originally Posted by prairie_goat
Originally Posted by R_H_Clark
Originally Posted by safariman
A Agree 100% that sticking a 222 or 223 round in an action designed for and large enough for a 30/06 or even a 308 size cartridge is a horrific idea. Sloppy at best IMO. You might want to look at the new Savage 223, I think it is called a model 23 or 24? Looks to be a correctly sized action. Also, for as little as the Zastava Mini Mausers cost, I would be temtped to get one and then have the metal and wood massaged a little. The end result might cost around $1,000 or so, but would be a quite spectacular little rifle.

The little CZ's are awsome, too. I just personally cannot like the bass ackwards safety and know of no place to get a different one for those little rifles.


I would much rather have a small action light 223 in an 8 twist for around $800 but I don't think such an animal exists. The Tikka may be large, but it's light and I bet it shoots very well.



In that case, might as well go full retard and build on a P-17 Enfield. Could likely get one put together for even less than $800.

Nah.....buying a Tikka when a small action is the primary qualifier is the definition of "Going full retard".


No, what's retarded is not having the reading comprehension to know that I only suggested the Tikka based on weight, and having to continue arguing, about something that only matters because you have to feel superior. I honestly don't care what he chooses and was only trying to help the OP.

Last edited by R_H_Clark; 03/18/14.