24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,410
Likes: 6
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,410
Likes: 6
I see that now some reporter in Poland is speculating that the famous Amber Room from St. Petersburg could be on it. Needless to say, that's 110% speculation but it would be the find to end all finds if it's there.


“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
― George Orwell

It's not over when you lose. It's over when you quit.

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,946
Likes: 5
J
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,946
Likes: 5
The cleaning lady post must be tongue in cheek. Last I heard they had not opened the tunnel yet, but using some type of sensors have confirmed a train with artillery on some cars.


Most people don't really want the truth.

They just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,269
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 19,269
JMR, WWII armored trains USUALLY ha 1 flatcar ahead of the locomotive,,loco,tender the 2 armored gun cars with 20mm side shooting guns,an 88 or 75 mm turreted gun on top then freighter cars after. usually 2. Fully armed train will be impressive.


Be afraid,be VERY VERY afraid
ad triarios redisse
My Buddy eh76 speaks authentic Frontier Gibberish!
[Linked Image]
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Originally Posted by JoeBob
The Polish government had a press conference today officially confirming its existence. They claim not to know what is on it, but they confirm the existence of a 100 meter long armored train and they estimate its value at least 1.2 billion Euros.

Regardless of what actual treasure is on that train, a 70 year old train that was parked and walked away from is a treasure in and of itself. The locomotive and the cars will be worth millions themselves. Everyday objects on the train could well be priceless today.

It may turn out to be another Al Capone's vault, but this could be the biggest archeological/historical find of the century.


What I want to know is how do you lose a 100 meter train for 70 years??

Where the hell was it?




The 280 Remington is overbore.

The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
This is in POLAND.

What more needs to be said?




Dave


Originally Posted by Geno67
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual.
Originally Posted by Judman
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
Originally Posted by KSMITH
My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
IC B2

Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,410
Likes: 6
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,410
Likes: 6
Quote
What I want to know is how do you lose a 100 meter train for 70 years??

Where the hell was it?
It's in a tunnel built for air raids. I don't know how they hid the tracks going in unless they completely removed the rails and the roadbed.


“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
― George Orwell

It's not over when you lose. It's over when you quit.
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,410
Likes: 6
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 69,410
Likes: 6
Originally Posted by deflave
This is in POLAND.

What more needs to be said?




Dave
Lets just say the Poles were a bit behind schedule. When Germany invaded them at the start of the war, the Poles sent out horse cavalry to stop the tanks. Didn't work.


“In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act.”
― George Orwell

It's not over when you lose. It's over when you quit.
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,786
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,786
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Originally Posted by deflave
This is in POLAND.

What more needs to be said?




Dave
Lets just say the Poles were a bit behind schedule. When Germany invaded them at the start of the war, the Poles sent out horse cavalry to stop the tanks. Didn't work.


They went to their death knowing they could not prevail.

Give them their due, they were brave bastards.


These are my opinions, feel free to disagree.
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 31,619
Likes: 5
K
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
K
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 31,619
Likes: 5
Hell In 1939 every army in the world still had mounted cavalry regiments. Some used the hell out of em pretty effectively. Like the Russians for example.


Founder
Ancient Order of the 1895 Winchester

"Come, shall we go and kill us venison?
And yet it irks me the poor dappled fools,
Being native burghers of this desert city,
Should in their own confines with forked heads
Have their round haunches gored."

WS

Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 23,453
Originally Posted by JSTUART
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Originally Posted by deflave
This is in POLAND.

What more needs to be said?




Dave
Lets just say the Poles were a bit behind schedule. When Germany invaded them at the start of the war, the Poles sent out horse cavalry to stop the tanks. Didn't work.


They went to their death knowing they could not prevail.

Give them their due, they were brave bastards.


This.

The Polish Air Force (yes, they had one) was flying WWI vintage and engineered craft against the Luftwaffe. They knew they were going to die, but they fought and did so valiantly. They put up FAR more of a fight than did the better armed, better equipped, and better warned French (Army, not Resistance - the French Resistance were badasses).


Originally Posted by Mannlicher
America needs to understand that our troops are not 'disposable'. Each represents a family; Fathers, Mothers, Sons, Daughters, Cousins, Uncles, Aunts... Our Citizens are our most valuable treasure; we waste far too many.
IC B3

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Didn't they rip the fugk out of all the tracks and blow as many tunnels and bridges as possible?

I would think one blown tunnel would look the same as the rest.




Travis


Originally Posted by Geno67
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual.
Originally Posted by Judman
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
Originally Posted by KSMITH
My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 31,619
Likes: 5
K
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
K
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 31,619
Likes: 5
In post war interviews with German participants in the Battle of France, German troops stated many times that the fight in France against French troops was a bad as anything they faced in Russia. The problem with the poilu was the French govt finally decided to revamp their military in 1935. To little too late The vast percentage of the forces in metro France were reservist still issued Great War equipment.

Look at the numbers of casualties on both sides in 5 weeks of fighting!!!


Founder
Ancient Order of the 1895 Winchester

"Come, shall we go and kill us venison?
And yet it irks me the poor dappled fools,
Being native burghers of this desert city,
Should in their own confines with forked heads
Have their round haunches gored."

WS

Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,812
Likes: 5
J
JoeBob Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,812
Likes: 5
Yeah, it is pretty much a debunked myth that the Poles charged tanks with horses. Oh, the Poles had horse cavalry, as did everyone else in 1939, but they didn't use them against tanks. Remember, in 1939 tank warfare was still largely theoretical and some still thought that cavalry would be the best way to exploit the gaps that tanks made in enemy lines.

Oh, and there WERE instances of Polish cavalry catching German support units unawares and absolutely cutting them to ribbons. Cavalry, used correctly, was still pretty effective back then. Hell, in the right terrain and circumstances, it could be today. The main advantage to cavalry has for the last 150 years or so, in delivering men to the fight quickly as opposed to the actual fighting.

And as for the amber room, it is speculation, but not completely baseless speculation. The last place it was definitively seen was in Koenigsburg. Koenigsburg was largely evacuated to Breslau. Breslau is where the train originated. Likewise there are reports linking it to a train in Breslau in the last days of the war.

Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Campfire Sage
Offline
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Lets just say the Poles were a bit behind schedule. When Germany invaded them at the start of the war, the Poles sent out horse cavalry to stop the tanks. Didn't work.


The story regarding the Pollocks cavalry attacking tanks isn't as "stupid" as a lot of people make it out to be.

At that point in history countries either transitioned, or were transitioning to armor. If you didn't have armor, you used horses. Technology took a huge leap and not every nation was ready for it.



Travis


Originally Posted by Geno67
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual.
Originally Posted by Judman
Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit.
Originally Posted by KSMITH
My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 19,504
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 19,504
Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by KFWA
I'd like to see pictures soon


PM your cell number.




Travis


Wrong kind of train, you sicko! sick


4 out of 5 Great Lakes prefer Michigan. smile
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,812
Likes: 5
J
JoeBob Offline OP
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
J
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 14,812
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by kaywoodie
In post war interviews with German participants in the Battle of France, German troops stated many times that the fight in France against French troops was a bad as anything they faced in Russia. The problem with the poilu was the French govt finally decided to revamp their military in 1935. To little too late The vast percentage of the forces in metro France were reservist still issued Great War equipment.

Look at the numbers of casualties on both sides in 5 weeks of fighting!!!


The French actually did a lot of modernizing in the early 1930s. The problem? The state of the art fighter plane of 1934 was hopelessly obsolete by 1939 against a German Air Force that really didn't get serious about modernizing until 1936-37. French tanks however, were better than anything the Germans had. The doctrine was wrong in their use, however.

The poor French really had no chance. The Maginot Line worked. However, they had a real problem with Belgium. Belgium was an ally and therefore, the French had to stop at the border with Belgium. If they had built the Maginot Line on the border with Belgium, that would have been a very clear signal to Belgium that in the event of a war, the French intended to sit behind their line and leave Belgium to its fate. That realization would have probably caused Belgium to cast its eyes eastward to Germany and an alliance or agreement with Germany in hopes of security. It would have upset the balance of power and potentially given the Germans a free ride to the French border with Belgium in the event of a war.

So, the French could not build the Maginot line all the way to the sea and instead, promise Belgium that in the event of war with Germany that French troops would rush forward to defend Belgium against invasion. The Germans capitalized on this and waited for the French and English to rush into Belgium and simply cut in behind them and cut them off.

Last edited by JoeBob; 08/30/15.
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,786
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 29,786
Originally Posted by bruinruin
Originally Posted by deflave
Originally Posted by KFWA
I'd like to see pictures soon


PM your cell number.




Travis


Wrong kind of train, you sicko! sick


You do know that jealousy is a sin...right?


These are my opinions, feel free to disagree.
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 18,033
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 18,033
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by kaywoodie
In post war interviews with German participants in the Battle of France, German troops stated many times that the fight in France against French troops was a bad as anything they faced in Russia. The problem with the poilu was the French govt finally decided to revamp their military in 1935. To little too late The vast percentage of the forces in metro France were reservist still issued Great War equipment.

Look at the numbers of casualties on both sides in 5 weeks of fighting!!!


The French actually did a lot of modernizing in the early 1930s. The problem? The state of the art fighter plane of 1934 was hopelessly obsolete by 1939 against a German Air Force that really didn't get serious about modernizing until 1936-37. French tanks however, were better than anything the Germans had. The doctrine was wrong in their use, however.

The poor French really had no chance. The Maginot Line worked. However, they had a real problem with Belgium. Belgium was an ally and therefore, the French had to stop at the border with Belgium. If they had built the Maginot Line on the border with Belgium, that would have been a very clear signal to Belgium that in the event of a war, the French intended to sit behind their line and leave Belgium to its fate. That realization would have probably caused Belgium to cast its eyes eastward to Germany and an alliance or agreement with Germany in hopes of security. It would have upset the balance of power and potentially given the Germans a free ride to the French border with Belgium in the event of a war.

So, the French could not build the Maginot line all the way to the sea and instead, promise Belgium that in the event of war with Germany that French troops would rush forward to defend Belgium against invasion. The Germans capitalized on this and waited for the French and English to rush into Belgium and simply cut in behind them and cut them off.
I will respectfully disagree about the quality of the French tanks. The Renaults were no match for the front line German armor.


molɔ̀ːn labé skýla
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 31,619
Likes: 5
K
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
K
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 31,619
Likes: 5
Joe Bob,

You are 100% correct. The French plan was not to fight the next war in France! The Maginot line as you pointed out did exactly want it was suppose to do. Force the Germand back into the Low Countries

The Belgian King opted to declare neutrality. Hence stopping construction on their portion of the line. The French terrain on the Belgian border would have taken immense additional engineering construction due to the water table.

French armor was feared by the Germans. As I stated once before a treatise from St Cyr by General Fontaine laid the groundwork for a method of armor/infantry assault interaction. But fell upon deaf ears in the French govt.
The French had an immense army. But most of it was around the world in colonies. And their metro army was divided into three types. A standing army of individuals who were obligated to a two year enlistment, Groupe A reservist who were the former active duty types and Groupe B reservist. Who were the older vets like Great War Vets. It was a Groupe B division (the 55eme) that stopped Rommel at Sedan for three days until he hit them with over 2000 Stuka sorties and the division ceased to exist!


Founder
Ancient Order of the 1895 Winchester

"Come, shall we go and kill us venison?
And yet it irks me the poor dappled fools,
Being native burghers of this desert city,
Should in their own confines with forked heads
Have their round haunches gored."

WS

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 31,619
Likes: 5
K
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
K
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 31,619
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by gophergunner
Originally Posted by JoeBob
Originally Posted by kaywoodie
In post war interviews with German participants in the Battle of France, German troops stated many times that the fight in France against French troops was a bad as anything they faced in Russia. The problem with the poilu was the French govt finally decided to revamp their military in 1935. To little too late The vast percentage of the forces in metro France were reservist still issued Great War equipment.

Look at the numbers of casualties on both sides in 5 weeks of fighting!!!


The French actually did a lot of modernizing in the early 1930s. The problem? The state of the art fighter plane of 1934 was hopelessly obsolete by 1939 against a German Air Force that really didn't get serious about modernizing until 1936-37. French tanks however, were better than anything the Germans had. The doctrine was wrong in their use, however.

The poor French really had no chance. The Maginot Line worked. However, they had a real problem with Belgium. Belgium was an ally and therefore, the French had to stop at the border with Belgium. If they had built the Maginot Line on the border with Belgium, that would have been a very clear signal to Belgium that in the event of a war, the French intended to sit behind their line and leave Belgium to its fate. That realization would have probably caused Belgium to cast its eyes eastward to Germany and an alliance or agreement with Germany in hopes of security. It would have upset the balance of power and potentially given the Germans a free ride to the French border with Belgium in the event of a war.

So, the French could not build the Maginot line all the way to the sea and instead, promise Belgium that in the event of war with Germany that French troops would rush forward to defend Belgium against invasion. The Germans capitalized on this and waited for the French and English to rush into Belgium and simply cut in behind them and cut them off.
I will respectfully disagree about the quality of the French tanks. The Renaults were no match for the front line German armor.


Yes but the Char B's and Soumi 35's were more than a match for German Armor. Matter of fact first tanks American paras hit during Market Garden were captured Char B's in German service!


Founder
Ancient Order of the 1895 Winchester

"Come, shall we go and kill us venison?
And yet it irks me the poor dappled fools,
Being native burghers of this desert city,
Should in their own confines with forked heads
Have their round haunches gored."

WS

Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

582 members (1beaver_shooter, 1badf350, 12344mag, 10gaugeman, 160user, 10Glocks, 62 invisible), 2,245 guests, and 1,323 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,697
Posts18,494,224
Members73,977
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.172s Queries: 54 (0.016s) Memory: 0.9197 MB (Peak: 1.0256 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-06 21:29:26 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS