24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,365
G
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
G
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,365
Originally Posted by bwinters
Recently bought a Sinclair concentricity gauge. Its been eye-opening. I wondered why my 257 Robts Hornady Superformance still shot so crappy in my bedded Montana. They have runout from 0.000 to 0.010. You can see some of the bullets wobble, and it ain't a little bit.

So, spent some time this AM sorting cases. I'm doing final load work-ups and picked only those cases with 0.0015 or less runout to use. I checked some of my other loaded handloads and they are fairly straight - most at ~ 0.002 or less. I did come across a couple of 0.005-6 which I think explains a few of my flyers I get. I'm hoping any way. Can't tell you how tired I am of shooting great 3-5 shot groups with 2-4 tight and 1 out an inch or so, making a nice 1.5-1.75" group. All this time I thought it was me wink

Anywho - how do you guys straighten loaded ammo? I know Hornady has a system but I'm looking for the redneck ingenuity method.

Thanks.

BTW: my Redding dies turn out some really straight cases. I have a couple of RCBS that do but have a couple that may need some investigation as most of the big handful of cases I measured had necks with up to 0.005 runout. Gonna be pretty hard to get bullet concentric when it starts out 0.005 crooked.........


I played this game years ago when I got into bench rest shooting, but since then let it go. What made me stop was having ammo sorted with run out, shot them out of my bench gun and sh&t didn't make a bit of difference. Gun was grouping in the .1's just like the sorted rounds, from that day forward I stopped doing it. And if that didn't make that much difference in a bench gun I sure it wont make any difference in a factory gun. You guys can flame me on this but I have a lot of custom guns that will shoot bug holes without doing the concentric game. If I can put 10 shots in a group that measures .1 or .2 how much better can it get.

GB1

Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,623
N
NTG Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
N
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 2,623
Helpful and interesting. What dies, etc. do you use to build your rounds...that'll make a difference as I understand it.

Last edited by NTG; 03/14/16.
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,789
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 2,789
ALL dies are a crap shoot because of the minute differences in all, and how they match to the chamber for which the round will be used. When dies are made the setup of the body and the wear in the reamer being used, and then the warpage, if any, in their heat treatment, ALL affect them. I use dies from most manufacturers and I have had good luck with cheapo's and bad luck with expensive ones. The features of a particular manufacturer usually propel you to one or the other, but you're still rolling the dice. I've got some great Lyman and Lee dies that really work for a particular barrel, and the Forsters and Reddings can't match them. I've also had bad luck with all and not necessarily the fault of the maker. That's the reason I have 43 different die sets!

Some of mine here:
[Linked Image]


Used to be bobski, member since '01
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 38,866
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 38,866
Good post, Bob.


Not a real member - just an ordinary guy who appreciates being able to hang around and say something once in awhile.

Happily Trapped In the Past (Thanks, Joe)

Not only a less than minimally educated person, but stupid and out of touch as well.
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,117
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,117
gemby,

How much runout on the benchrest rounds you were testing?


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
IC B2

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,365
G
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
G
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,365
John that's was back in the 80's, and really don't remember. But when shooting them and them grouping like they were I said to myself why even bother. I sold my gauge and never checked them again. I use Redding bushing neck die, body die when the shoulder needs bumped back and Forester seating die. Beside my benchrest guns I have many custom sporter, varmint, and long range guns that shoot bug holes. Greg

Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 126
B
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
B
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 126
Bending a bullet or neck back into a straight position treats the symptom, not the problem. The problem that leads to non-concentric ammo is a combination of brass prep and tools used that change the shape of the brass. Could also add in reloading technique.

If your reloading technique yields "consistent" results - regardless if concentric or crooked, then you should feel confident your reloading techniques being used are solid, it's just identifying steps you are not taking (brass prep) and a critical eye on your forming and seating dies.

That is if you believe concentric ammo is worth pursuing. I do believe it contributes. Any one step may not be measurable, but all the added steps are cumulative - which is where you will see an improvement.

If you choose to bypass neck turning - it's my opinion you're limited to a Lee Collet Die, and a good seating die that supports the whole case when seating. Neck turning does not negate the positive impacts of the above tools either.

Choosing the right combination of components contributes as well, think barrel harmonics, low SD and low ES. If one reload is 100 fps faster than the next - how can it possibly have the same point of impact very far down the range?

If the bullet comes out the end of the barrel the same every time, it will hit the same place on the target. It's just that simple.

Of course - this is all just my opinion, and your mileage may vary.

Last edited by Burr; 03/15/16.
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15,892
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 15,892
tagging this thread.


There are 2 rules to success:

1. Never tell everything that you know.
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,117
M
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,117
Greg,

Thanks for the info, which explains a lot.

There's no real point in using a concentricity gauge in really accurate rifles (especially custom-chambered with a minimal reamer) when using good dies. I don't bother in my own benchrest rifle, either, because any tiny differences in run-out with neck-turned cases loaded in Redding Competition dies don't result in any discernible accuracy differences. I also use good dies of various sorts, combined with good brass, in my varmint rifles, because I am NOT going to check every damn one of 1000 rounds of prairie dog ammo. But we're talking about differences of maybe .001" or at most .002" in concentricity.

On the other hand, concentricity gauges are VERY useful in many other rifles, especially typical factory big game rifles with looser chambers and barrels, especially when using standard dies. Partly this is because the difference in how much more bullet run-out can result from standard dies.

I started using a gauge because of mysteries in how well big game rifles shot with various kinds of ammo or even bullets. My first was an RCBS Casemaster, and the instructions suggested no more than .005" of bullet runout, measured about .1 inch in front of the case mouth, for big game rifles, and no more than .003" for varmint rifles. Over the years I found those recommendations to be pretty much spot-on, especially with factory rifles--but they're obviously many times what we might encounter with match-type dies and neck-turned brass.

A concentricity gauge not only allows a handloader to figure out which rounds might be causing fliers in his .270 or .338, but to pinpoint the problem in the loading process that causes bullets to have too much runout.

The RCBS Casemaster even revealed why one of my .270's apparently "liked" 150-grain Hornady Spire points so much it would group them in around an inch at 300 yards. This was a Remington 700 ADL with no modifications other than adjusting the trigger, bedding the action, and free-floating the barrel. I never could get similar accuracy out of any other bullet in that rifle, even Sierras, and it turned out the seating die apparently fit the Spire Point ogive closer than tangential ogives in Sierras--so seated the Hornadys much straighter, even in ordinary brass.

Have also used a concentricity gauge to turn ordinary sizing dies into what are essentially Forster dies, by raising the expander ball inside the die. The ball, however, often must be adjusted to a particular point to get the most benefit, and the concentricity gauge reveals that point. Have also used it to make other simple die or loading process modifications that improved accuracy considerably.

Have also used a concentricity gauge to sort factory ammo, with very definite results. Once had a custom 7x57 with a Hart barrel and minimum chamber, and came across a very good deal on a bunch of Hornadys now-discontinued Light Magnum loads with the 139 boattail Spire Point. I sorted them into three batches, one with runout up to .003", another up to .005", and the third over .005". The .003" batch would consistently shoot into .5 or a little more, the .005" batch into around an inch, and the over-.005" batch into 1.5".

As a result of long use of concentricity gauges, most of the time I don't need to measure the run-out on loaded ammo, but do tend to measure it on test loads with new bullets and brass--just to make sure I'm testing the load at the range, and not run-out. But if there are a few rounds with bullets slightly out of line, I use the TruAngle tool to straighten them. Have found through that experimentation that it's pretty much a waste to try to straighten rounds more than .002" over specs, but less than that certainly works. Again, the concentricity gauge revealed that information.

Now, not much of this may be of interest to you, because of the types of dies and rifles you use. But it is of interest to many handloaders who use average ammo in average rifles, where a concenctricity gauge definitely can make a big difference.



“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 930
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 930
and there's no other tool I know of that will measure the wall thickness down at the web where separation may take place!


When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns! (from a 1960's bumper sticker)
IC B3

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,828
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,828
Originally Posted by GhettoSportsman
and there's no other tool I know of that will measure the wall thickness down at the web where separation may take place!


It may not give me a number, but a straightened out paper clip with an end bent into a short, 90 degree hook tells me what's going on down there.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,828
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,828
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Have also used a concentricity gauge to sort factory ammo, with very definite results. Once had a custom 7x57 with a Hart barrel and minimum chamber, and came across a very good deal on a bunch of Hornadys now-discontinued Light Magnum loads with the 139 boattail Spire Point. I sorted them into three batches, one with runout up to .003", another up to .005", and the third over .005". The .003" batch would consistently shoot into .5 or a little more, the .005" batch into around an inch, and the over-.005" batch into 1.5".


I've done a similar thing with 7.62x51 LC match ammunition in an accurate factory rifle. The results were strengthened by the fact the trigger man didn't know what he was testing, so no preconceived notions.

Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 13,235
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2015
Posts: 13,235
Tag, good stuff


Let's Go Brandon! FJB
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 930
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 930
Originally Posted by mathman
Originally Posted by GhettoSportsman
and there's no other tool I know of that will measure the wall thickness down at the web where separation may take place!


It may not give me a number, but a straightened out paper clip with an end bent into a short, 90 degree hook tells me what's going on down there.


Hmm.. How does that work? I've heard that before but I fail to see how rubbing a paper clip along the side wall tells you what you need to know! Without a number the case wall feels "kinda" ok?


When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns! (from a 1960's bumper sticker)
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Y
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Y
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,755
Originally Posted by GhettoSportsman
Originally Posted by mathman
Originally Posted by GhettoSportsman
and there's no other tool I know of that will measure the wall thickness down at the web where separation may take place!


It may not give me a number, but a straightened out paper clip with an end bent into a short, 90 degree hook tells me what's going on down there.


Hmm.. How does that work? I've heard that before but I fail to see how rubbing a paper clip along the side wall tells you what you need to know! Without a number the case wall feels "kinda" ok?


Have you tried looking in the cases with a bright flashlight? I've found I can see a shadow ring before I feel anything with a paper clip. Obviously this works better on some cases than others; I use a lot of mil-surp 308 brass and check all of them this way.

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 930
G
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
G
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 930
Originally Posted by Yondering
Originally Posted by GhettoSportsman
Originally Posted by mathman
Originally Posted by GhettoSportsman
and there's no other tool I know of that will measure the wall thickness down at the web where separation may take place!


It may not give me a number, but a straightened out paper clip with an end bent into a short, 90 degree hook tells me what's going on down there.


Hmm.. How does that work? I've heard that before but I fail to see how rubbing a paper clip along the side wall tells you what you need to know! Without a number the case wall feels "kinda" ok?


Have you tried looking in the cases with a bright flashlight? I've found I can see a shadow ring before I feel anything with a paper clip. Obviously this works better on some cases than others; I use a lot of mil-surp 308 brass and check all of them this way.


Thanks! I couldn't remember how the paper clip method worked. I got an RCBS Casemaster as soon as I started loading and can measure exactly what the case thickness is anywhere inside the case! I like to keep an eye on the area just ahead of the web for possible separation issues. Somehow the feel method never gave me a warm fuzzy feeling! lol JMHO


When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns! (from a 1960's bumper sticker)
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,849
Campfire Outfitter
OP Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 8,849
MD - very nice reasoning behind why I bought and am learning to use the data gained from a run-out gauge. I'm hoping the Sinclair helps connect some of the dots and reveals relationships between dies, brass and patterns of the holes on the paper. I do not own any custom rifles or dies. I have been frustrated in recent years with random flyers in my groups. I've bedded and re- bedded guns, changed scopes, did more case prep, about everything else - except evaluating each step in the load development process related to sizing brass. I'm hopeful the Sinclair and some study will help eliminate flyers and improve my session to session consistency. If not, I'm only out $100 and have added to the experience banks.


Adversity doesn't build character, it reveals it.
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,365
G
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
G
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,365
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
Greg,

Thanks for the info, which explains a lot.

There's no real point in using a concentricity gauge in really accurate rifles (especially custom-chambered with a minimal reamer) when using good dies. I don't bother in my own benchrest rifle, either, because any tiny differences in run-out with neck-turned cases loaded in Redding Competition dies don't result in any discernible accuracy differences. I also use good dies of various sorts, combined with good brass, in my varmint rifles, because I am NOT going to check every damn one of 1000 rounds of prairie dog ammo. But we're talking about differences of maybe .001" or at most .002" in concentricity.

On the other hand, concentricity gauges are VERY useful in many other rifles, especially typical factory big game rifles with looser chambers and barrels, especially when using standard dies. Partly this is because the difference in how much more bullet run-out can result from standard dies.

I started using a gauge because of mysteries in how well big game rifles shot with various kinds of ammo or even bullets. My first was an RCBS Casemaster, and the instructions suggested no more than .005" of bullet runout, measured about .1 inch in front of the case mouth, for big game rifles, and no more than .003" for varmint rifles. Over the years I found those recommendations to be pretty much spot-on, especially with factory rifles--but they're obviously many times what we might encounter with match-type dies and neck-turned brass.

A concentricity gauge not only allows a handloader to figure out which rounds might be causing fliers in his .270 or .338, but to pinpoint the problem in the loading process that causes bullets to have too much runout.

The RCBS Casemaster even revealed why one of my .270's apparently "liked" 150-grain Hornady Spire points so much it would group them in around an inch at 300 yards. This was a Remington 700 ADL with no modifications other than adjusting the trigger, bedding the action, and free-floating the barrel. I never could get similar accuracy out of any other bullet in that rifle, even Sierras, and it turned out the seating die apparently fit the Spire Point ogive closer than tangential ogives in Sierras--so seated the Hornadys much straighter, even in ordinary brass.

Have also used a concentricity gauge to turn ordinary sizing dies into what are essentially Forster dies, by raising the expander ball inside the die. The ball, however, often must be adjusted to a particular point to get the most benefit, and the concentricity gauge reveals that point. Have also used it to make other simple die or loading process modifications that improved accuracy considerably.

Have also used a concentricity gauge to sort factory ammo, with very definite results. Once had a custom 7x57 with a Hart barrel and minimum chamber, and came across a very good deal on a bunch of Hornadys now-discontinued Light Magnum loads with the 139 boattail Spire Point. I sorted them into three batches, one with runout up to .003", another up to .005", and the third over .005". The .003" batch would consistently shoot into .5 or a little more, the .005" batch into around an inch, and the over-.005" batch into 1.5".

As a result of long use of concentricity gauges, most of the time I don't need to measure the run-out on loaded ammo, but do tend to measure it on test loads with new bullets and brass--just to make sure I'm testing the load at the range, and not run-out. But if there are a few rounds with bullets slightly out of line, I use the TruAngle tool to straighten them. Have found through that experimentation that it's pretty much a waste to try to straighten rounds more than .002" over specs, but less than that certainly works. Again, the concentricity gauge revealed that information.

Now, not much of this may be of interest to you, because of the types of dies and rifles you use. But it is of interest to many handloaders who use average ammo in average rifles, where a concenctricity gauge definitely can make a big difference.



John would you say Remingtons and Savages have minimal chambers, I have many factory rifles I use for carry hunting and I don't check runout for these rifles and there all are 1/2" MOA or better rifles.o

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,828
M
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
M
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,828
Originally Posted by gemby58
John would you say Remingtons and Savages have minimal chambers, I have many factory rifles I use for carry hunting and I don't check runout for these rifles and there all are 1/2" MOA or better rifles.o


Are you rich? If not, why haven't you cashed in your lotto tickets? grin

Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,365
G
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
G
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 10,365
Originally Posted by mathman
Originally Posted by gemby58
John would you say Remingtons and Savages have minimal chambers, I have many factory rifles I use for carry hunting and I don't check runout for these rifles and there all are 1/2" MOA or better rifles.o


Are you rich? If not, why haven't you cashed in your lotto tickets? grin


LOL. I have and yes I am

Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

98 members (260Remguy, 257_X_50, 450yukon, 79S, 300_savage, 6MMWASP, 12 invisible), 1,641 guests, and 953 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,756
Posts18,476,383
Members73,942
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.126s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9160 MB (Peak: 1.0874 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-29 07:00:42 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS