|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,184
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,184 |
I replaced my el cheapo crossbow scope with a Nikon scope and noticed the front bell of the scope is barely touching the receiver. Even though there's no recoil I'm wondering if I should put a spacer under the scope mounts. I suspect I should but wonder what everybody else thinks.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,737
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 8,737 |
Did you up size to a 50mm from 40mm objective?
Just a thought but unless it's long range night hunting 50mm is not frequently needed and tends to bang into things. Even the 40mmscope do too but with rifle hunters those 50mm scopes are too big for most hunting.
If is a 40mm and you had a 40mm it should be the same gap or space. Just my opinion but I would have stuck to the 40mm objective.
In the other hand maybe you went from 30mm to 40mm, that's a good idea. Just get a taller set of rings then.
www.huntingadventures.netAre you living your life, or just paying bills until you die? When you hit the pearly gates I want to be there just to see the massive pile of dead 5hit at your feet. ( John Peyton)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,184
Campfire Tracker
|
OP
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 5,184 |
I found my old scope and it is a 4x32. The new Nikon scope is a 3X32 but the OD of the Nikon is slightly bigger. I replaced the old scope because it wouldn't hold zero. I suspect it was touching the receiver also. Time for higher mounts like you suggest. The 3X32 Nikon is much brighter/clearer than the old 4X32 scope.
|
|
|
|
535 members (1minute, 1badf350, 10ring1, 10gaugemag, 1lessdog, 06hunter59, 52 invisible),
2,501
guests, and
1,159
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,782
Posts18,515,759
Members74,017
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|