Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunting Rifles Model 70 vs 84M

Print Thread

Hop To

Page 7 of 7

Re: Model 70 vs 84M Old_Doe_Shooter #11242227 06/12/16
Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 22,274 Back in Texas, for good! tex_n_cal Campfire Ranger
tex_n_cal Campfire Ranger Joined: Dec 2002 Posts: 22,274 Back in Texas, for good!	Yesterday I wandered through Wheelers in Boerne, Tx, and they had a couple Kimber Classics. Calibers were ho hum '06 & .270 Win, but I noticed they are now guaranteeing "Sub-MOA accuracy". So apparently they got the word that they oughta use better barrels. "...the designer of the .270 Ingwe cartridge!..."

HR IC

Re: Model 70 vs 84M tex_n_cal #11242641 06/12/16
Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 37,161 Likes: 3 Central Louisiana D Dirtfarmer Campfire 'Bwana
Dirtfarmer Campfire 'Bwana D Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 37,161 Likes: 3 Central Louisiana	Originally Posted by tex_n_cal Yesterday I wandered through Wheelers in Boerne, Tx, and they had a couple Kimber Classics. Calibers were ho hum '06 & .270 Win, but I noticed they are now guaranteeing "Sub-MOA accuracy". So apparently they got the word that they oughta use better barrels. Or maybe Ed Weatherby marketing sub MOA rifles for much less... DF

Page 7 of 7

Moderated by RickBin

Link Copied to Clipboard

AX24

528 members (22250rem, 257_X_50, 2500HD, 219DW, 1234, 007FJ, 64 invisible), 2,359 guests, and 1,339 robots.

Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod

May
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
			1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31

Forum Statistics

Forums81

Topics1,192,797

Posts18,496,262

Members73,977

Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023

Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.118s Queries: 18 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8056 MB (Peak: 0.8273 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-07 20:12:28 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS