24hourcampfire.com
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" #11508225 10/16/16
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 10,675
RickBin Offline OP
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 10,675
Hi Guys:

I want to thank John Barsness (Mule Deer) for his latest exclusive Campfire article.

Please use this space to ask John questions about THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT

Enjoy, folks!


"What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as freedom should not be highly rated." Thomas Paine
BP-B2

Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: RickBin] #11550247 11/02/16
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,508
I
IndyCA35 Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
I
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 10,508
John, did I miss something? What wind velocity were you assuming?


Don't blame me. I voted for Trump.
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: RickBin] #11550325 11/02/16
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,105
beretzs Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 8,105
Great write up.


Semper Fi
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: IndyCA35] #11551035 11/02/16
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 53,053
M
Mule Deer Online Content
Campfire Oracle
Online Content
Campfire Oracle
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 53,053
10 mph full value.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: RickBin] #11587812 11/15/16
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,705
bobnob17 Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,705
Shooting 243 and with all the BC that the 105g Amax brings, with a launch speed around 3000fps, I've often wondered if one wasn't better shooting a good plastic tipped boat tail bullet like the 87g Vmax at 3250fps for foxes, dogs, goats and similar.

Running the numbers and making some realistic decisions about how far away you can actually hit something the size of a fox, it's certainly possible to make a case for the lighter, faster projectile.

We're sure spoiled for choice these days, which is good news for retailers I suppose!

IC-A

Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: RickBin] #11592504 11/17/16
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 536
CAPITALIST Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 536
Thanks for illuminating the path, John! I was looking for reasonably priced 168 gr FMJ's for my AR-10 when I found obscenely priced 150's at evergladesammo.com (now even cheaper at $199/1000 with free shipping!). I've believed all of the hype of bc for quite some time, but I ran the numbers in a ballistics software program and the difference was nil except for about 100 ft/lbs of energy out to 800 yards; and up to that point, the 150's actually perform better in many aspects. Your article confirmed my hypothesis! Thanks again.


�Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.� - Thomas Jefferson

For this President we prayed... now we pray that the Lord wasn't saying, "Be careful whatcha wish for..."
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: CAPITALIST] #11592662 11/17/16
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 53,053
M
Mule Deer Online Content
Campfire Oracle
Online Content
Campfire Oracle
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 53,053
Cool! Glad you liked it. Great deal on the bullets.... :-)


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: RickBin] #11633948 12/05/16
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,879
1
16bore Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
1
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,879
I messed with some numbers awhile back and it seems to me that the "gains" (essentially meaning lest drift) of increased BC tend to level off.

Not sure if my method was scientific or even appropriate for the idea, but I used a 150gr bullet at 3,000 FPS and ran drift at 1000 yards.

.1=542"
.2=264"
.3=168"
.4=144"
.5=83"
.6=64"
.7=53"
.8=45"
.9=39"
1.0=34"


Anyway, I'm no Brian Litz....but I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express once.

Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: 16bore] #11634964 12/05/16
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
B
BobinNH Offline
Campfire Oracle
Offline
Campfire Oracle
B
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
Good article!

My favorite high BC 7mm bullet is the 162 Amax. At 3200 fps the trajectory matches the dots in a 6x36 LR about exactly at 400, 500, and 600 yards.




The 280 Remington is overbore.

The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: RickBin] #11742331 01/16/17
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 59
R
rblum100 Offline
Member
Offline
Member
R
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 59
John, thanks for the great article on BC. I use that as a bullet selection factor in long range shooting. However, BC relies on the accuracy of the information put out by the bullet manufacturers. I ran across a study published in 2012 by four cadets at the US Air Force Academy. That study concluded that most bullet manufactures do not accurately set out the ballistic coefficients of their bullets. I read the article with interest. My conclusion is that it is not an accident, believing that if it were accidental, the results would be scattershot around true bc.
My reading the article, including an analysis of standard deviations, in an attempt to measure intentional missreporting vs measurement error, it appears that at least one manufacturer was significantly overstating BC intentionally.
My conclusion is that BC may be a starting point, but beware of manufacturers claims of BC. The proof is tight consistent groups rather than BC Claims.
The article is available at: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a554683.pdf

IC-B

Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: rblum100] #11744366 01/16/17
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 53,053
M
Mule Deer Online Content
Campfire Oracle
Online Content
Campfire Oracle
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 53,053
rblum100,

Yeah, I've seen that report, which is why I advise buying Bryan Litz's book BALLISTIC PERFORMANCE OF RIFLE BULLETS, based on his range-testing and calculations. Have used Bryan's results a lot, which has saved me lots of ammo!

Sometimes manufacturers make the mistake of testing bullets only at 100 yards for BC, which naturally results in higher BC's than over longer distances. But I have definitely seen some "competition" in listed BC's over the decades. It reminds me of what an outfitter buddy once noted about getting a booth at a sports show, in the middle of a bunch of other elk outfitters. Somebody will ask one outfitter what his "success rate" is, and if the answer is 60%, the outfitter next to him will claim 65%!



“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: Mule Deer] #11806929 02/07/17
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,529
MacLorry Offline
Campfire Guide
Offline
Campfire Guide
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,529
Thanks for another interesting article John. One caution in doing such experiments in software is that the flight characteristics of a given style of bullet can change as weight changes. Here's a link to a YouTube video that analyzes the Laupa 7mm 180 and 150 grain Scenar-L bullets using Laupa's custom drag functions. The 180 grain matches up well with G7 while the 150 grain matches up better with G1. Not something I expected and without knowing that a comparison using either G7 or G1 for both bullets may not be accurate.

I see Hornady is using Doppler radar to produce custom drag functions for their 4DOF calculator, but I didn't see anything for the .204 Ruger at this point, so it would be hard to say if the 45 and .223 75 grain V-Max bullets both match up well with either G7 or G1.

Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: MacLorry] #11806938 02/07/17
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 53,053
M
Mule Deer Online Content
Campfire Oracle
Online Content
Campfire Oracle
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 53,053
Very interesting!

The interest in longer-range shooting has sure spurred some innovation in calculating/measuring BC's.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: RickBin] #11915492 03/21/17
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3
A
adirondacktrapper Offline
New Member
Offline
New Member
A
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3
My Remington 280 in 139GRN on a T/C ProHunter platform and a 100yrd zero with a BDC Reticle at 3 power 1st hash mark is 404yrds second 654yrds third 849yrds and thats with accutually a 7mm Bullet

Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: adirondacktrapper] #11922479 03/24/17
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 53,053
M
Mule Deer Online Content
Campfire Oracle
Online Content
Campfire Oracle
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 53,053
I dunno what your point is, but turning the magnification of any second-focal plane variable down increases the distance between the hashmarks. It has nothing to do with ballistic coefficient.


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: RickBin] #11986713 04/20/17
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,883
E
Etoh Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
E
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,883
Extremes in spread and sd of long range loads, 800+ yds are more trouble some than worries about BC


If you have an opinion, it's on a bell curve--somewhere
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: Mule Deer] #12202987 08/12/17
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 907
M
Mac284338 Offline
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 907
Great article MD. Just read so late to party. Would like your thoughts on following. If shooting 6.5CM w/142ABLR at 2700 using a ballistic program do I really want to plug-in the Nosler published BC of .719 or some lesser value (down to the G1 of .320) and then start shooting to verify? Thoughts/suggestions? If it helps, 4-16 Viper HS-T w/VMR-1 using Strelok+ program. Mike, NRA life member.

Last edited by Mac284338; 08/12/17.
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: RickBin] #12511927 01/01/18
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 4,555
P
pete53 Offline
Campfire Guide
Offline
Campfire Guide
P
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 4,555
John, here`s my question: I asked a simple question on a post,got some real negative replies.here is the question that`s in the lever-big bore and you may have read it too ? >> do you consider the 300 win. mag big bore? my thought since its a lever ,has much more power,accuracy and ability to shoot at much longer ranges ,plus this type lever rifle handles newer higher pressure cartridges.


LIFE NRA
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: RickBin] #12511970 01/01/18
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 53,053
M
Mule Deer Online Content
Campfire Oracle
Online Content
Campfire Oracle
M
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 53,053
Pete,

No, I don't consider the .300 Winchester magnum big bore, but such opinions are always subjective. Some older African hunters considered the .450/.400 Nitro-Express and .416 Rigby "medium bores."


“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.”
John Steinbeck
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT" [Re: RickBin] #12512036 01/01/18
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 4,555
P
pete53 Offline
Campfire Guide
Offline
Campfire Guide
P
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 4,555
John, thanks for quick answer, here`s two more Questions : why doesn`t campfire have 2 different site post? one for the better quality single shot rifles ? the other is lever rifles like the BRL Brownings that handle the newer higher pressure cartridges ?


LIFE NRA
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin, SYSOP 

RR1
Who's Online Now
835 registered members (10gaugemag, 12344mag, 10Glocks, 160user, 02bfishn, 01Foreman400, 85 invisible), 2,619 guests, and 980 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
RR2/3










Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2022 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.3
(Release build 20190728)
PHP: 7.3.31 Page Time: 0.094s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8760 MB (Peak: 1.0380 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2021-10-25 01:15:28 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS