NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
#11508225
10/16/16
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 10,615
RickBin
OP
Campfire 'Bwana
|
OP
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 10,615 |
Hi Guys: I want to thank John Barsness (Mule Deer) for his latest exclusive Campfire article. Please use this space to ask John questions about THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT Enjoy, folks!
"What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as freedom should not be highly rated." Thomas Paine
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: RickBin]
#11550247
11/02/16
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,734
IndyCA35
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 9,734 |
John, did I miss something? What wind velocity were you assuming?
Don't blame me. I voted for Trump.
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: RickBin]
#11550325
11/02/16
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,920
beretzs
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 6,920 |
Semper Fi
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: IndyCA35]
#11551035
11/02/16
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51,654
Mule Deer
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51,654 |
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: RickBin]
#11587812
11/15/16
|
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,705
bobnob17
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,705 |
Shooting 243 and with all the BC that the 105g Amax brings, with a launch speed around 3000fps, I've often wondered if one wasn't better shooting a good plastic tipped boat tail bullet like the 87g Vmax at 3250fps for foxes, dogs, goats and similar.
Running the numbers and making some realistic decisions about how far away you can actually hit something the size of a fox, it's certainly possible to make a case for the lighter, faster projectile.
We're sure spoiled for choice these days, which is good news for retailers I suppose!
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: RickBin]
#11592504
11/17/16
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 536
CAPITALIST
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 536 |
Thanks for illuminating the path, John! I was looking for reasonably priced 168 gr FMJ's for my AR-10 when I found obscenely priced 150's at evergladesammo.com (now even cheaper at $199/1000 with free shipping!). I've believed all of the hype of bc for quite some time, but I ran the numbers in a ballistics software program and the difference was nil except for about 100 ft/lbs of energy out to 800 yards; and up to that point, the 150's actually perform better in many aspects. Your article confirmed my hypothesis! Thanks again.
�Tyranny is defined as that which is legal for the government but illegal for the citizenry.� - Thomas Jefferson
For this President we prayed... now we pray that the Lord wasn't saying, "Be careful whatcha wish for..."
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: CAPITALIST]
#11592662
11/17/16
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51,654
Mule Deer
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51,654 |
Cool! Glad you liked it. Great deal on the bullets.... :-)
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: RickBin]
#11633948
12/05/16
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,170
16bore
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 17,170 |
I messed with some numbers awhile back and it seems to me that the "gains" (essentially meaning lest drift) of increased BC tend to level off.
Not sure if my method was scientific or even appropriate for the idea, but I used a 150gr bullet at 3,000 FPS and ran drift at 1000 yards.
.1=542" .2=264" .3=168" .4=144" .5=83" .6=64" .7=53" .8=45" .9=39" 1.0=34"
Anyway, I'm no Brian Litz....but I stayed in a Holiday Inn Express once.
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: 16bore]
#11634964
12/05/16
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900
BobinNH
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 35,900 |
Good article!
My favorite high BC 7mm bullet is the 162 Amax. At 3200 fps the trajectory matches the dots in a 6x36 LR about exactly at 400, 500, and 600 yards.
The 280 Remington is overbore.
The 7 Rem Mag is over bore.
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: RickBin]
#11742331
01/16/17
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 59
rblum100
Member
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 59 |
John, thanks for the great article on BC. I use that as a bullet selection factor in long range shooting. However, BC relies on the accuracy of the information put out by the bullet manufacturers. I ran across a study published in 2012 by four cadets at the US Air Force Academy. That study concluded that most bullet manufactures do not accurately set out the ballistic coefficients of their bullets. I read the article with interest. My conclusion is that it is not an accident, believing that if it were accidental, the results would be scattershot around true bc. My reading the article, including an analysis of standard deviations, in an attempt to measure intentional missreporting vs measurement error, it appears that at least one manufacturer was significantly overstating BC intentionally. My conclusion is that BC may be a starting point, but beware of manufacturers claims of BC. The proof is tight consistent groups rather than BC Claims. The article is available at: http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a554683.pdf
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: rblum100]
#11744366
01/16/17
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51,654
Mule Deer
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51,654 |
rblum100,
Yeah, I've seen that report, which is why I advise buying Bryan Litz's book BALLISTIC PERFORMANCE OF RIFLE BULLETS, based on his range-testing and calculations. Have used Bryan's results a lot, which has saved me lots of ammo!
Sometimes manufacturers make the mistake of testing bullets only at 100 yards for BC, which naturally results in higher BC's than over longer distances. But I have definitely seen some "competition" in listed BC's over the decades. It reminds me of what an outfitter buddy once noted about getting a booth at a sports show, in the middle of a bunch of other elk outfitters. Somebody will ask one outfitter what his "success rate" is, and if the answer is 60%, the outfitter next to him will claim 65%!
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: Mule Deer]
#11806929
02/07/17
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,529
MacLorry
Campfire Guide
|
Campfire Guide
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,529 |
Thanks for another interesting article John. One caution in doing such experiments in software is that the flight characteristics of a given style of bullet can change as weight changes. Here's a link to a YouTube video that analyzes the Laupa 7mm 180 and 150 grain Scenar-L bullets using Laupa's custom drag functions. The 180 grain matches up well with G7 while the 150 grain matches up better with G1. Not something I expected and without knowing that a comparison using either G7 or G1 for both bullets may not be accurate. I see Hornady is using Doppler radar to produce custom drag functions for their 4DOF calculator, but I didn't see anything for the .204 Ruger at this point, so it would be hard to say if the 45 and .223 75 grain V-Max bullets both match up well with either G7 or G1.
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: MacLorry]
#11806938
02/07/17
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51,654
Mule Deer
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51,654 |
Very interesting!
The interest in longer-range shooting has sure spurred some innovation in calculating/measuring BC's.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: RickBin]
#11915492
03/21/17
|
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3
adirondacktrapper
New Member
|
New Member
Joined: Oct 2015
Posts: 3 |
My Remington 280 in 139GRN on a T/C ProHunter platform and a 100yrd zero with a BDC Reticle at 3 power 1st hash mark is 404yrds second 654yrds third 849yrds and thats with accutually a 7mm Bullet
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: adirondacktrapper]
#11922479
03/24/17
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51,654
Mule Deer
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51,654 |
I dunno what your point is, but turning the magnification of any second-focal plane variable down increases the distance between the hashmarks. It has nothing to do with ballistic coefficient.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: RickBin]
#11986713
04/20/17
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,782
Etoh
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,782 |
Extremes in spread and sd of long range loads, 800+ yds are more trouble some than worries about BC
If you have an opinion, it's on a bell curve--somewhere
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: Mule Deer]
#12202987
08/12/17
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 760
Mac284338
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 760 |
Great article MD. Just read so late to party. Would like your thoughts on following. If shooting 6.5CM w/142ABLR at 2700 using a ballistic program do I really want to plug-in the Nosler published BC of .719 or some lesser value (down to the G1 of .320) and then start shooting to verify? Thoughts/suggestions? If it helps, 4-16 Viper HS-T w/VMR-1 using Strelok+ program. Mike, NRA life member.
Last edited by Mac284338; 08/12/17.
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: RickBin]
#12511927
01/01/18
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 3,931
pete53
Campfire Guide
|
Campfire Guide
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 3,931 |
John, here`s my question: I asked a simple question on a post,got some real negative replies.here is the question that`s in the lever-big bore and you may have read it too ? >> do you consider the 300 win. mag big bore? my thought since its a lever ,has much more power,accuracy and ability to shoot at much longer ranges ,plus this type lever rifle handles newer higher pressure cartridges.
LIFE NRA
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: RickBin]
#12511970
01/01/18
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51,654
Mule Deer
Campfire Oracle
|
Campfire Oracle
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 51,654 |
Pete,
No, I don't consider the .300 Winchester magnum big bore, but such opinions are always subjective. Some older African hunters considered the .450/.400 Nitro-Express and .416 Rigby "medium bores."
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
Re: NOVEMBER - Ask John Barsness Questions About "THE REALITIES OF BALLISTIC COEFFICIENT"
[Re: RickBin]
#12512036
01/01/18
|
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 3,931
pete53
Campfire Guide
|
Campfire Guide
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 3,931 |
John, thanks for quick answer, here`s two more Questions : why doesn`t campfire have 2 different site post? one for the better quality single shot rifles ? the other is lever rifles like the BRL Brownings that handle the newer higher pressure cartridges ?
LIFE NRA
|
|
|
|
747 registered members (10ring1, 007FJ, 10gaugemag, 1911a1, 12344mag, 77 invisible),
1,834
guests, and 1,018
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|