|
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,694
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 17,694 |
Thanks Steve for the link was a good read!
Deer Camp! about as good as it gets!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,692
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 21,692 |
"The number one problem with America is, a whole lot of people need shot, and nobody is shooting them." -Master Chief Hershel Davis
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,375
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,375 |
I wonder what prompted them to make it with a 3" barrel? It's not a concealed carry piece, or if it is there are tons better options. I know powerful stubby revolvers are a big fad now - the 2.5" Ruger Alaskan in .454 Casull and some other short barreled .44 Magnums out there - but a 4" barrel seems like a much more all around useful length.
Gunnery, gunnery, gunnery. Hit the target, all else is twaddle!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,733
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 17,733 |
I would think because the 431 is, and the 696 is, and the 396 is. I like it.
NRA LIFE MEMBER GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS ESPECIALLY THE SNIPERS! "Suppose you were an idiot And suppose you were a member of Congress... But I repeat myself." -Mark Twain
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,559
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,559 |
I would think because the 431 is, and the 696 is, and the 396 is. I like it. Yep, and I would consider it a perfectly appropriate concealed carry piece. Three inches in a medium frame revolver is about right for that, reminiscent of the FBI configured S&W Model 13.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
I wonder what prompted them to make it with a 3" barrel? It's not a concealed carry piece, or if it is there are tons better options. I know powerful stubby revolvers are a big fad now - the 2.5" Ruger Alaskan in .454 Casull and some other short barreled .44 Magnums out there - but a 4" barrel seems like a much more all around useful length. They should have shot for the stars and gone 5". But I'll be happy with three. (That's what she said) Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
Hey Whit',
Safe to say we can hot rod the fugh out of these things? The GP is a tank.
Travis
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,197
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,197 |
Your hands may disagree. 900fps should be enough.
Bangflop! another skinning job due to .260 and proper shot placement.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,143
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,143 |
Here's a photo of mine -- more to follow (excuse the poor quality):
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,520
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,520 |
Several advantages of the Mountain Gun over a smaller-framed piece. I had both the L frame 69 and the Mountain Gun and decided the MG was superior. I sold the 69 to a cop who seemed to like it.
A lot of people hate the Governor, but it also fills nearly the same niche. The Governor is also pretty light. It's a bit bulky for concealment, but in cooler weather, it works. I haven't tried to conceal the MG that I recall.
Cool gun, but I'll pass so somebody more interested can get one. Elmer said he was in favor of anything that burned powder. I can't disagree. Agree on all Ethan. A 45 Colt MG is 3 ounces heavier and the Governor is 10 ounces lighter. The GP44 is only an ounce and a half lighter than a S&W Model 22-4 with a 4" barrel.
Direct Impingement is the Fart Joke of military rifle operating systems. ⓒ
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,308
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 6,308 |
I wonder what prompted them to make it with a 3" barrel? It's not a concealed carry piece, or if it is there are tons better options. I know powerful stubby revolvers are a big fad now - the 2.5" Ruger Alaskan in .454 Casull and some other short barreled .44 Magnums out there - but a 4" barrel seems like a much more all around useful length. They should have shot for the stars and gone 5". But I'll be happy with three. (That's what she said) Travis I agree totally. 5" is about perfect for this class of revolvers. It would make it legal to hunt with in states with barrel length restrictions.
Last edited by deerhunter5555; 12/18/16.
Buy once, cry once.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,638
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,638 |
None for me. I prefer 4-6 inch barrels for hunting revolvers. But I applaud Ruger for once again coming out with another new model.
My biggest fear is when I die my wife will sell my guns for what I told her they cost.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,681
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 11,681 |
Seeing that picture makes me wish for a 4" half lug barrel and a fluted cylinder. A 5" half lug would be fine also.
Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,559
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 131,559 |
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,375
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 28,375 |
Seeing that picture makes me wish for a 4" half lug barrel and a fluted cylinder. A 5" half lug would be fine also. The only DA revolver I have left is a stainless GP-100 6” .357 with the half lug barrel, they only made a few of those maybe 8-9 years ago. They made a run in blued finish as well but I don't know the particulars on those. While the full lug has a nice muzzle heavy balance IMHO it isn’t needed for a .357 Magnum level of recoil, the half lug really brings the balance back into the hand and gives the revolver a much lighter and more responsive feel. I agree that a 4" or 5” half lug would be the bee’s knees for a field use .44 Special. While obviously Ruger’s market research led them to this 3” full lug, I still can't figure out the thinking behind that.
Gunnery, gunnery, gunnery. Hit the target, all else is twaddle!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317 |
Hmm, wonder what kind of pressures it could run as a 45 colt? Also curious if I could find a take off 454 barrel and have it fit.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
No comments about POI/POA. I hope they didn't fugk it up. Dave
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424
Campfire Sage
|
Campfire Sage
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 115,424 |
Hmm, wonder what kind of pressures it could run as a 45 colt? Also curious if I could find a take off 454 barrel and have it fit. That cylinder can swallow a LC? I was thinking ACP and clips. Dave
Trump being classless,tasteless and clueless as usual. Sorry, trump is a no tax payin pile of shiit. My young wife decided to play the field and had moved several dudes into my house
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 21,317 |
Google fu shows 1.60" for the GP-100 cylinder. You'd have to stick with shorter bullet lengths, but it would work.
I guess it would be cheaper for me to get 44 sp dies, brass and bullet molds than convert to 45 colt. Cheaper still would be the 4" 45 colt redhawk.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,520
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,520 |
Dear Ruger: This, in a six-shot 10mm. Hurry please.
Last edited by SargeMO; 12/19/16.
Direct Impingement is the Fart Joke of military rifle operating systems. ⓒ
|
|
|
|
441 members (007FJ, 22kHornet, 160user, 10Glocks, 1lesfox, 222ND, 37 invisible),
2,160
guests, and
1,168
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,392
Posts18,469,896
Members73,931
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|