|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 998
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 998 |
Is there any major disadvantage to using 150 grain bullets for elk hunting. It seems the .308 users like them but the consensus is that 165 and 180 grains are the Holy Grail for the odd6. Seeing is that they are closely related is there a disadvantage?
Experience is what you get, when you don't get what you want!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,491 Likes: 9
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,491 Likes: 9 |
What type of bullet? Nosler Partition? Sierra Match? VLD? In general terms, I'd go with 180's. You'll appreciate the extra weight if you smack a shoulder blade, less than broadside shot angle, etc.
Best of luck!
You only live once, but...if you do it right, once is enough.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 16,053 Likes: 25
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 16,053 Likes: 25 |
155 Scenars work well on elk out of .308s.
I don't have personal experience with 155 Scenars out of a 30-06 on elk, but I don't see why they would not be effective with the extra velocity provided with the -06.
THE CHAIR IS AGAINST THE WALL. The Tikka T3 in .308 Winchester is the Glock 19 of the rifle world. The website is up and running!www.lostriverammocompany.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 5,537 Likes: 12
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 5,537 Likes: 12 |
My wife and a few friends all killed their elk 2 seasons ago with Winchester 150 Gr Power Points. I was very pleased and surprised at how well they worked on elk. Breaking major bone (upper leg) on 2 elk of the 4 elk killed with them, 2 bullets didn't exit, but the recovered bullets weigh 134 and 129 grains each. That's as good as a Nosler partition.
The heavier 180s in the tougher bullets penetrate better. In the trees an exit wound is a BIG benefit leaving a blood trail to follow. I am usually a fanatic about my rifle loads giving me exits on elk. But with that said, I still have to praise how well the standard WW 150 gr worked and how accurate they are I get sub MOA out of my 308 with them. Bullet weight is a bit less important then bullet construction.
In my experience my daughters 257 Roberts with 115 Barnes TSX bullets out penetrates 180 grain Sierra 30 cals in 30-06, and 300 magnums. The holes are not as big around with the 257, but they go clear through, and the Sierras don't about half the time.
I have never seen a Burger get through an elk yet regardless of caliber, rifle cambering or bullet weight.
Bullet toughness is what you want to look at first and then weight.
Last edited by szihn; 02/28/17.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,478 Likes: 4
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,478 Likes: 4 |
My son killed a huge cow elk with a 308 and a 150 grain partition.
Bang flop.
It's more about bullets than weight within reason.
I shoot the 155 Secnars now, and wouldn't hesitate to shoot an elk with my 308 and that bullet over Varget.
“Live free or die. Death is not the worst of evils.” - General John Stark.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 754 |
I think there's a decided disadvantage from 300 yards and longer...
example: Looking at the ballistics of a 150 grain partition traveling at 2900fps, compared to a 200 grain partition at 2650fps tells you that the 200 grain handles long range with more energy delivered by about 25%, and will penetrate much more because of the sectional density.
No reason to shoot the small pill in my mind.
“Even if you’re on the right track, you’ll get run over if you just sit there.” --- Will Rogers
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,751 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 5,751 Likes: 1 |
Is there any major disadvantage to using 150 grain bullets for elk hunting. It seems the .308 users like them but the consensus is that 165 and 180 grains are the Holy Grail for the odd6. Seeing is that they are closely related is there a disadvantage? FWIW, here's a quote from Dogzapper, a guy with one or 2 elk under his belt... Are 165-grain Hornady Interlocked bullets adequate for elk? Yup, I've killed a few score with them; never had an elk need two of them and more elk dropped at the shot than not.
The 150-grain Hornady Interlocked is also an incredible elk-killing bullet. Not a classic elk bullet, perhaps, but if anything I've experienced BETTER KILLS with them than any other bullet ... .30-'06 or .308 Winchester, pick your poison.
Note: Elk killing is considerable different than writing stuff in the gun-funnybooks. Also, frankly, it takes many, many years of elk killing to understand what works, what kinda works and what is gonna leave you following a long blood-trail with quite possibly a horrible evening at the end of it.
The Hornady Interlocked 165s and 150s work very well on elk and I prefer them to the 180s and 190s. (That was the next question and I saved someone from asking it)
Steve FC
"Every day is a holiday, and every meal is a banquet."
- Mrs. FC
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,555
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,555 |
If memory serves, the first elk killed with the then-new 308 Winchester back in the 1950s was killed with a 150 grain Winchester factory load. Today's premium 150 grain bullets would be even better. That said, I would use a 165-168 grain premium bullet in a 30-06 or 308 for game as large as elk. The one elk I shot with a 30 caliber rifle took a 180 grain Trophy Bonded Bear Claw out of a 300 Weatherby Magnum. It worked just fine.
Last edited by Jerseyboy; 02/28/17.
NRA Endowment Life Member, G.O.A supporter
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,695
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,695 |
I use 180 grain bullets. No reason to fix what isn't broken.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,122 Likes: 8
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 19,122 Likes: 8 |
For longer ranges, compare the impact velocity and energy from a 180 gr bullet and a 150 gr bullet. Even more so a 200 gr bullet.
I prefer a heavy for caliber bullet,as I know they will hold up at short ranges that elk are normally killed a. Of course that does not apply to most mono bullets and partitions as such.
I'm one of the stupid ones though,I like the 220 gr RN in the.06, when I know I am in for 300 +yard shots, I defer to the 180 gr partitions
If God wanted you to walk and carry things on your back, He would not have invented stirrups and pack saddles
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,012 Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 7,012 Likes: 3 |
Several years ago, I loaded up some Barnes 150 gr. TSX bullets for my son's '06. They went over the chronograph at 2950 fps, and sub-MOA accuracy, out of his older Savage bolt action.
On his cow elk hunt, he took a large cow at 250 yards, which ran 40 yards and dropped. Bullet was a pass-thru. Couldn't ask for better performance from a bullet from the '06, IMO.
The 150 grainers offer less recoil than the heavier 165 and 180 bullets, which can be a real advantage for recoil-sensitive shooters.
I'd rather be a free man in my grave, than living as a puppet or a slave....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,325
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,325 |
Almost any bullet will kill elk ( or moose) if they are shot broadside through the forward ribs. Things get more interesting when the shot is not so perfect. I've twice seen 150 grain cup and core .308" bullets stopped dead by the humerus/ scapula joint when elk were angling 45° towards the hunter and were shot at the point of the shoulder at moderate range. Both those elk would have escaped and would have been lost if they hadn't been shot again while they hobbled off. One was a small calf. I have never seen a more substantial bullet of more weight stopped dead in a similar manner, a dozen other elk and moose shot with .308/180's or other heavier / larger bullets placed similarly were quickly killed when the bullet continued through that hard bone and into the vitals. However, no bullet is a sure thing. One bull I shot at the point of the shoulder with a .375 H&H and 260gr. NP ran off as if nothing much happened. Another quick shot to the spine dropped him. That first big, strong bullet entered the point of the shoulder, broke the joint, pulverized the scapula, and exited out the same side without ever penetrating the chest cavity. Improbable, but true. I'd hunt elk with a .308/150 cup and core bullet if that's all I had available, but I greatly prefer something heavier and stronger. the bull that deflected the 260 gr. NP... and the calf that stopped the 150 grain ...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,278 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,278 Likes: 1 |
Is there any major disadvantage to using 150 grain bullets for elk hunting. It seems the .308 users like them but the consensus is that 165 and 180 grains are the Holy Grail for the odd6. Seeing is that they are closely related is there a disadvantage? No there really isn't any problem with a 150 in the 06. I prefer 165's in both the 06 and 308, altho there is a lot to be said for a 180 out of a 308 when hunting timber. Makes a person get a better understanding why the 30-40 Krag had such a following back in the day.
the most expensive bullet there is isn't worth a plug nickel if it don't go where its supposed to. www.historicshooting.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,985 Likes: 2
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 6,985 Likes: 2 |
For twenty years I used 150 grain cup & core 30-06 bullets and killed a bunch of elk. But one day it took three shots in the chest at close range to drop a cow elk. She just stood there while I pumped rounds into her lungs. She was so close that I could see the hair raise and the muscles twitch each time a bullet hit her. That's not the kind of performance that I wanted so I switched to 30-06, 180 grain Nosler Partitions. That was twenty years ago and there have been no problems with that bullet.
KC
Wind in my hair, Sun on my face, I gazed at the wide open spaces, And I was at home.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 998
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 998 |
If I make this purchase i would not use cup and core bullets due to the bullet weight. I would be using something more substantial.
Experience is what you get, when you don't get what you want!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,278 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,278 Likes: 1 |
More substantial than what? I've never recovered a 165 gr Hornady interloc from an elk hit broadside at 250 yds and under yet, and the very few from over 250 yds was usually a lump under the hide on the far side.. "premium" bullets are all well and good but cup and core bullets were putting elk in the freezer for decades before "premiums" were invented.
the most expensive bullet there is isn't worth a plug nickel if it don't go where its supposed to. www.historicshooting.com
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,887 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,887 Likes: 1 |
I use 200 grain NPs in a 300 win mag for everything just about. That said my daughter has now killed two elk with a .308 and 150 cup and core federals. She broke both of this bulls front legs last November. He turned 180 degrees after the first hit. When I went to quarter him I could flop both front legs almost straight up without any cutting. He went about 40-50 yards but it was mostly stumbling/falling down a pretty steep hill. Shot distance around 240 yards. Not a huge sample size for sure. But it's there. I've shown this photo a couple times. The first time just to brag and now a couple times to show what some "inferior" guns and loads can do. Ok, I'm bragging now too.
Last edited by Ralphie; 03/02/17.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,952 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 18,952 Likes: 3 |
For good reason. Ok, I'm bragging now too.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651 |
So far I've dropped three elk with a .30-06. Two were with a 165g North Fork SS, one with a 150g Nosler AB. All three dropped at the shot.
As a matter of preference, my vote goes for the heavier 165g bullet.
Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!
No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.
A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 27
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 27 |
For twenty years I used 150 grain cup & core 30-06 bullets and killed a bunch of elk. But one day it took three shots in the chest at close range to drop a cow elk. She just stood there while I pumped rounds into her lungs. She was so close that I could see the hair raise and the muscles twitch each time a bullet hit her. That's not the kind of performance that I wanted so I switched to 30-06, 180 grain Nosler Partitions. That was twenty years ago and there have been no problems with that bullet.
KC
This is my choice as well.
|
|
|
|
428 members (1936M71, 222Sako, 160user, 17CalFan, 163bc, 10ring1, 48 invisible),
11,384
guests, and
1,304
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,195,344
Posts18,546,498
Members74,060
|
Most Online21,066 May 26th, 2024
|
|
|
|