|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313 |
Quickload demo software won't install in the Windows virtual machine on the MAC I use for business. When I get back home tomorrow (Philly, PA, and Burbank, CA, this week) I'll try it on my real Windows system. Interested to see what it thinks a 30-06 could do at 62Kpsi so we can have an apples to apples pressure comparison with the .308 Win. Also interested some other scenarios: 1. My .257 Roberts with +P brass and 62Kpsi loads, a 4Kpsi over SAAMI MAP. (Not that I intend to change my +P loads - they work fine as-is, good reach with low recoil.) 2. My .280 Rem at 62,000 PSI. 3. For the fun of it, the Roberts, .280 Rem and .30-06 at 63Kpsi, 64Kpsi and 65Kpsi. I mean, since nobody uses manufacturer load data these days... Within SAAMI pressure for both, .30-06 will generally exceed .308 by betwen 50-150 ft/s depending on the exact length of the bullet (stubby hunting bullets tend to be on the low end, bullets with boat tails, tips, voids, secant ogives etc. tend to be on the high end). The difference also depends a little bit on how willing you are to use a highly compressed load that might require a drop tube. For both .308 and .30-06 you'll see performance above what's generally commercially available and .308 hand load performance with top powders will generally meet or exceed .30-06 commercial performance and .30-06 hand loads with older powders. In other words, the difference between powders like RL-17/26/33, ReloadSwiss 60 (Europe only, sadly) etc and the old IMR powders is bigger than the difference between the .308 and .30-06 cases.
Last edited by Llama_Bob; 06/23/17.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,253 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,253 Likes: 6 |
Within SAAMI pressure for both, .30-06 will generally exceed .308 by betwen 50-150 ft/s depending on the exact length of the bullet (stubby hunting bullets tend to be on the low end, bullets with boat tails, tips, voids, secant ogives etc. tend to be on the high end). The difference also depends a little bit on how willing you are to use a highly compressed load that might require a drop tube.
You don't say......? What a revelation.
Last edited by JGRaider; 06/23/17.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313 |
Before you get too excited, remember that the loads almost everyone hunts with in .30-06, even the "hot" ones out of reloading manuals, don't exceed .308 performance at all or only by a exceedingly limited amount < 50 ft/s. If you think those loads in .30-06 are good, then you have to like the .308 even more since it does exactly the same thing with less recoil in the same weight gun (or lighter gun, same recoil). The only .30-06 loads that exceed .308 performance use a very limited number of powders - RL16/17, RL25/26, and a couple of European ones. And very little manufacturer data is available for those powders, so the only way you'll actually see ANY advantage out of the .30-06 without just randomly making loads up is to use Quick Load, which seems to chap your hide to no end
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179 |
Within SAAMI pressure for both, .30-06 will generally exceed .308 by betwen 50-150 ft/s depending on the exact length of the bullet (stubby hunting bullets tend to be on the low end, bullets with boat tails, tips, voids, secant ogives etc. tend to be on the high end). The difference also depends a little bit on how willing you are to use a highly compressed load that might require a drop tube.
You don't say......? What a revelation. Brilliant Ain't he? Jerry
jwall- *** 3100 guy***
A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap
Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,413 Likes: 1
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 4,413 Likes: 1 |
So Llama_Bob, the only thing that pressure is rated on is the load itself? What about, how does distance from the lands figure in to this pressure thing.Please inlighten us.
~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~ As Bob Hagel would say"You should not use a rifle that will kill an animal when everything goes right; you should use one that will do the job when everything goes wrong."Good words of wisdom...............
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,253 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,253 Likes: 6 |
Before you get too excited, remember that the loads almost everyone hunts with in .30-06, even the "hot" ones out of reloading manuals, don't exceed .308 performance at all or only by a exceedingly limited amount < 50 ft/s. If you think those loads in .30-06 are good, then you have to like the .308 even more since it does exactly the same thing with less recoil in the same weight gun (or lighter gun, same recoil). The only .30-06 loads that exceed .308 performance use a very limited number of powders - RL16/17, RL25/26, and a couple of European ones. And very little manufacturer data is available for those powders, so the only way you'll actually see ANY advantage out of the .30-06 without just randomly making loads up is to use Quick Load, which seems to chap your hide to no end Hate to put a damper on your seminar, but I don't give a crap. I'd rather kill stuff with my 7-08 anyway.
Last edited by JGRaider; 06/23/17.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,831
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 6,831 |
Quickload demo software won't install in the Windows virtual machine on the MAC I use for business. When I get back home tomorrow (Philly, PA, and Burbank, CA, this week) I'll try it on my real Windows system. Interested to see what it thinks a 30-06 could do at 62Kpsi so we can have an apples to apples pressure comparison with the .308 Win. Also interested some other scenarios: 1. My .257 Roberts with +P brass and 62Kpsi loads, a 4Kpsi over SAAMI MAP. (Not that I intend to change my +P loads - they work fine as-is, good reach with low recoil.) 2. My .280 Rem at 62,000 PSI. 3. For the fun of it, the Roberts, .280 Rem and .30-06 at 63Kpsi, 64Kpsi and 65Kpsi. I mean, since nobody uses manufacturer load data these days... Within SAAMI pressure for both, .30-06 will generally exceed .308 by betwen 50-150 ft/s depending on the exact length of the bullet (stubby hunting bullets tend to be on the low end, bullets with boat tails, tips, voids, secant ogives etc. tend to be on the high end). The difference also depends a little bit on how willing you are to use a highly compressed load that might require a drop tube. For both .308 and .30-06 you'll see performance above what's generally commercially available and .308 hand load performance with top powders will generally meet or exceed .30-06 commercial performance and .30-06 hand loads with older powders. In other words, the difference between powders like RL-17/26/33, ReloadSwiss 60 (Europe only, sadly) etc and the old IMR powders is bigger than the difference between the .308 and .30-06 cases. Quickload demo software won't install in the Windows virtual machine on the MAC I use for business. When I get back home tomorrow (Philly, PA, and Burbank, CA, this week) I'll try it on my real Windows system. Interested to see what it thinks a 30-06 could do at 62Kpsi so we can have an apples to apples pressure comparison with the .308 Win. Also interested some other scenarios: 1. My .257 Roberts with +P brass and 62Kpsi loads, a 4Kpsi over SAAMI MAP. (Not that I intend to change my +P loads - they work fine as-is, good reach with low recoil.) 2. My .280 Rem at 62,000 PSI. 3. For the fun of it, the Roberts, .280 Rem and .30-06 at 63Kpsi, 64Kpsi and 65Kpsi. I mean, since nobody uses manufacturer load data these days... Within SAAMI pressure for both, .30-06 will generally exceed .308 by betwen 50-150 ft/s depending on the exact length of the bullet (stubby hunting bullets tend to be on the low end, bullets with boat tails, tips, voids, secant ogives etc. tend to be on the high end). The difference also depends a little bit on how willing you are to use a highly compressed load that might require a drop tube. For both .308 and .30-06 you'll see performance above what's generally commercially available and .308 hand load performance with top powders will generally meet or exceed .30-06 commercial performance and .30-06 hand loads with older powders. In other words, the difference between powders like RL-17/26/33, ReloadSwiss 60 (Europe only, sadly) etc and the old IMR powders is bigger than the difference between the .308 and .30-06 cases. WOW. after all that name calling.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,253 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,253 Likes: 6 |
WOW. after all that name calling.
Sure took him a long time to admit what we all already knew, didn't it?
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651 |
Before you get too excited, remember that the loads almost everyone hunts with in .30-06, even the "hot" ones out of reloading manuals, don't exceed .308 performance at all or only by a exceedingly limited amount < 50 ft/s. ... Who needs handloads? About 95% of shooters and hunters use factory ammo. Please show us factory .308 Win loads that are comparable to these: Federal P3006TT4, 180g Trophy Bonded Tip .30-06 = 2880fps/3315fpe, 300 yards = 2346fps/2199fpe Winchester S3006LR 190g EBG-LR 30-06 = 2750fps, 300 yards is listed at 2339fps/2309fpe The best .308 Win 180g factory loads I've found fall about 200 yards short in performance.
Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!
No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.
A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313 |
I love how all the clowns are now excited because you can get a trivial advantage even though none of you have ever actually gotten that advantage because you don't own or use the tools that would let you get it. Big deal, that. If you actually look at what I posted, you'll see I always acknowledged there was a tiny difference, with the emphasis on VANISHINGLY TINY. But I know what you really want to have is a circle jerk, and I'm messing that up with facts
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313 |
Anyone who's looking for performance out of a rifle.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,757
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 10,757 |
30-06 Obsolete? Whatever, the 30-06 still works for me. Even used obsolete 180gr Hornady Interlocks and H4350.
A true sportsman counts his achievements in proportion to the effort involved and fairness of the sport. - S. Pope
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,253 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,253 Likes: 6 |
Wow, nice bull centershot. Great pic.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313 |
Also, Federal P3006TT4 shows as discontinued at Midway. Got any idea why? I'm thinking it might have been overpressure in a minimum-spec SAAMI chamber.
If so this would be a follow on to P3006TT3 being discontinued for pressure issues.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,253 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 28,253 Likes: 6 |
If the queen had balls she'd be the king........
My guess on the discontinuing deal is it was a slow seller, as is the usual reason. You need to quit simulating, estimating, and guessing. It makes a man with your vast knowledge look rather foolish.
It is irrelevant what you think. What matters is the TRUTH.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313 |
My guess on the discontinuing deal is it was a slow seller, as is the usual reason.
But coyote's convinced hunters are shooting this ammo. Can't have it both ways. In either case, it's gone. So now coyote is without his pet example, and still can't figure out how to beat .308 performance
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,929
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,929 |
Before you get too excited, remember that the loads almost everyone hunts with in .30-06, even the "hot" ones out of reloading manuals, don't exceed .308 performance at all or only by a exceedingly limited amount < 50 ft/s. ... Who needs handloads? About 95% of shooters and hunters use factory ammo. Please show us factory .308 Win loads that are comparable to these: Federal P3006TT4, 180g Trophy Bonded Tip .30-06 = 2880fps/3315fpe, 300 yards = 2346fps/2199fpe Winchester S3006LR 190g EBG-LR 30-06 = 2750fps, 300 yards is listed at 2339fps/2309fpe The best .308 Win 180g factory loads I've found fall about 200 yards short in performance. 200 yard difference???? I mean these two rounds are within 150 fps of each other.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 12,651 |
I love how all the clowns are now excited because you can get a trivial advantage even though none of you have ever actually gotten that advantage because you don't own or use the tools that would let you get it. Big deal, that. If you actually look at what I posted, you'll see I always acknowledged there was a tiny difference, with the emphasis on VANISHINGLY TINY. But I know what you really want to have is a circle jerk, and I'm messing that up with facts A 200 yard advantage is hardly "VANISHINGLY TINY" - except in your fantasies where you deny reality. Post a factory .308 Win load that matches the .30-06 loads I listed.
Coyote Hunter - NRA Patriot Life, NRA Whittington Center Life, GOA, DAD - and I VOTE!
No, I'm not a Ruger bigot - just an unabashed fan of their revolvers, M77's and #1's.
A good .30-06 is a 99% solution.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,929
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,929 |
I love how all the clowns are now excited because you can get a trivial advantage even though none of you have ever actually gotten that advantage because you don't own or use the tools that would let you get it. Big deal, that. If you actually look at what I posted, you'll see I always acknowledged there was a tiny difference, with the emphasis on VANISHINGLY TINY. But I know what you really want to have is a circle jerk, and I'm messing that up with facts A 200 yard advantage is hardly "VANISHINGLY TINY" - except in your fantasies where you deny reality. Post a factory .308 Win load that matches the .30-06 loads I listed. I still fail to see a 200 yard advantage. You're talking about a cartridge that's very much in service and that the Army uses to 800 meters and the Marine Corp uses to 900 meters.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,929
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,929 |
And at what range does this 200 yard advantage rear it's head? Is the .30-06 doing at 400 yards what the .308 is doing at 200? Hardly.
|
|
|
|
423 members (160user, 10gaugemag, 12344mag, 10gaugeman, 17CalFan, 163bc, 39 invisible),
2,072
guests, and
1,156
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,245
Posts18,486,132
Members73,967
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|