|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587 |
What are your opinions on these 2 new calibres? Which one would be more effective on big game like grizzly or Alaska/Yukon moose?
Thanks,
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 154
Campfire Member
|
Campfire Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 154 |
personally wouldn't go chasing grizz with a .338fed. huge difference in those two chamberings.
The Mountains Are Calling And I Must Go
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587 |
So the 325 WSM is a more powerful cartridge?
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,500 Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,500 Likes: 3 |
Harv, I view both cartridges as good choices for lightweight rifles for an old guy like me.....I would prefer the 325 especially if hunting large bears IF there were more factory loads available. I would have a 325WSM now if Federal had carried threw with their plans for ammo production....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,959
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,959 |
I am going to get a 325 in the Kimber Montana-intended use: Elk at close range(heavy timber) I would imagine that the 325 with a 200 grain TSX or partition would be dandy on a big bear as well.
"For joy of knowing what may not be known we take the golden road to Samarkand." James Elroy Flecker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704 |
Either one will work fine for any game in North America, within reasonable ranges. Either one can use bullets in excess of 200 grains at velocities of 2500 fps and above. At ranges of 300 yards and less, this sort of ballistic performance is quite adequate.
I certainly wouldn't hesitate to shoot a bear, were I to want to shoot a bear, within 100-150 yards with a good bullet in either cartridge.
"The more you run over a dead cat, the flatter it gets."
"If you're asking me something technical, you may be looking for My Other Brother Darrell."
"It ain't foot-pounds that kills stuff -- it's broken body parts."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,921
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 9,921 |
Do you reload? If not, well . . .
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,587 |
I am now all set up to reload...just have to learn how to properly.
Rob
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,704 |
Do you reload? If not, well . . . Are there places that make ammunition for you <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/grin.gif" alt="" />?
"The more you run over a dead cat, the flatter it gets."
"If you're asking me something technical, you may be looking for My Other Brother Darrell."
"It ain't foot-pounds that kills stuff -- it's broken body parts."
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,460
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,460 |
The .325 WSM is quite a bit more rifle, although I agree with others that either one would serve for big game quite well, withing reasonable parameters. I think if the big bears are specifically on the menu, then I would lean towards the .325, but otherwise the .338 Fed has a better selection of factory ammo and a few more bullets for handloading at this point.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,052
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,052 |
I'd hunt mountain grizzly or black bear anywhere with the 325 WSM, but I wouldn't be interested in so much as owning a rifle in 338 Federal.
And the truth is, I'd much rather stick with my old 338 Win. Mag. than hunt with either one of them............
AD
"The placing of the bullet is everything. The most powerful weapon made will not make up for lack of skill in marksmanship."
Colonel Townsend Whelen
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,205
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,205 |
+1 Allen, not really sure what the 338 Federal is all about? It lacks everything the 338WM can do with the same bullets and more.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,202 Likes: 6
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,202 Likes: 6 |
The 338 Federal will push 200 grain bullets to around 2600 fps. This would have been good medicine for anything in North America 60 years ago but the modern animals have evolved into a much more tenacious critter. These two cartridges are variations on a similar theme. The 325 works in a short action a provides magnum performance. The 338 Fed. works in a short action and provides less power. This means the 338 Fed could be used in a lighter rifle and still be manageable. The 338 Federal could also hold 5 rounds in the magazine. I think the entire family of cartridges based on the 308 case are very practical, usable, cartridges. The 338 Federal is no exception. Whether it will do well in the marketplace remains to be seen. GD
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,474 Likes: 3
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 17,474 Likes: 3 |
“Live free or die. Death is not the worst of evils.” - General John Stark.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,759
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 8,759 |
greydog,
Quit making sense! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smile.gif" alt="" /> +2
MtnHtr
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,052
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 3,052 |
You know what's really evolved over the last sixty years?
Hunting costs and trophy fees!
Go price a quality spring mountain grizzly hunt in Alaska, the Yukon, or BC, and then ask yourself if, under all conditions and with that sort of investment on the line, if the 338 Federal really is the best you can do in terms of cartridge selection.
Everything's all relative when it gets down to making armchair recommendations, and at that point, there's no harm in theorizing over the sufficiency of sixty year-old ballistics. But once you write the check and the hunt becomes official, things take a lot more serious turn. They get even more serious if you have ever had to deal with a grizzly charge, as I have, and you have had to iron-out some big boar at spitting distance.
Then the conversation moves from cocktail-time cartridges to optimum cartridges. Back in my great-grandfather's era, some ranchers still killed grizzlies with 30-30s and even 44-40s. But that doesn't mean that sort of cartridge is what I want to be using today.............even if it was legal to do so.
AD
"The placing of the bullet is everything. The most powerful weapon made will not make up for lack of skill in marksmanship."
Colonel Townsend Whelen
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,539
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,539 |
I hate both of these cartridges. I would have saved the cost of a Savage 111 bolt action rebarrel to .338-06, if they had come out a year sooner. Now all that I think about is a Sav 99, rebarreled from .308 to .338Fed for deer/hogs, and a new BLR in .325WSM for all western game. I like short action levers. For what it's worth, my .338-06 is a sweetheart and I'm glad to have it. Good luck.
George
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,959
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,959 |
I realize that both of the cartridges in question give the term "niche" a new meaning-but I am very interested in the 325WSM, not just because of the cartridge, but because I can get one in the Kimber Montana. Besides, it will go well with my 270WSM Montana. If I already had a 300WSM, I probably would not be that interested in the 325.
"For joy of knowing what may not be known we take the golden road to Samarkand." James Elroy Flecker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,205
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,205 |
Dont hate em and as a matter of fact,I thought the 325WSM would fill a good niche for our part of the country in a lightweight configuration and I owned one and sold it cuz I dont reload, and your left with little options and its demise in the volume sales dept is imminent because of this. The 338 Fed seems like a gun for guys that want to shoot a bigger cal but cant handle the recoil of a 338 WM and therefore sacrifice any kind of awesome performance. Cuz I cant think of a case where I'd want a lighweight SA caliber that would not have good LR trajectory and umph and or requires anything over a 30cal. Seems to fill very few niches I see. And if I am hunting big bears the weight of the gun is the least of my concerns so the SA will shine none. Confidence and UUmph is far more important. Blacks, moose and griz can easily be killed with far less than a 338 anything, with good bullet selection. so it leaves the 338 Fed doing very little, very well. But if someone wants something the 338 Fed included thats enough reason to buy anything.
|
|
|
|
75 members (35, 7mm_Loco, 10gaugemag, 406_SBC, 257robertsimp, 12 invisible),
1,701
guests, and
772
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,324
Posts18,526,464
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|