24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 557
P
Pre64 Offline OP
Campfire Regular
OP Offline
Campfire Regular
P
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 557
EdM,

Hamilton makes a great revolver for sure! Custom 5 shot Ruger's are a great investment if you ask me. If you can get one already done with a list of goodies it's very hard to resist. I'll post some pics of mine when it's done....

R


Ross Custom Arms
GB1

Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 5,502
S
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
S
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 5,502
My experience with both bullets ( I say bullets, not cartridges, because most of my experience with the 9.3MM is from the 9.3X74R not the 9.3X62) is that most 9.3 bullets are made with fairly heavy jackets and work well on game up to about a ton. The only one I condemn is the Speer 270 grain which is basically a very big varmint bullet. I have been with a number of hunters using the 9.3X62 when they killed game and I see no difference in how it works compared to my 9.3X74R.

My experience with the 35 Whelen against game is all from observation. I have never owned one, but I have made a bunch of them, and all were made for men that shoot hand-loads. I have never seen a single animal killed with a 35 Whelen with a factory load. All my friends shoot handloads in them. If you use a 250 grain Partition from Nosler or Swift, you will be able to kill anything in N. America and about 99% of things in Africa. The Barnes bullet also work very well as long as the striking velocity is above about 2000 FPS, and I am told when they don't open up well at lower velocities they still are pretty good. Again, it's not something I have seen with my own eyes, but I do believe the men who told me.

I have read a few negative reports about the 35 Whelen against larger game when bullets with jackets too thin were used, but I personally have never seen it. I'll just have to take their word for it. All tell me to stay away from any bullet that is 200 grains and anything that is designed for the 35 Remington, which is what I would have guessed if I had not been told.

The350 Rigby was legendary in it's effectiveness in Africa for many years and it shot 320 grain bullet of .358" diameter at only about 2100 FPS. If you get a custom barrel with a bit faster twist (say 1-12") instead of the 1-16" which we see so often I am sure the Woodleigh 320 grain bullets would make the 35 Whelen do all the old Rigby did. It may work with the slower twist, but for myself, I would not take that chance. A few dollars more for a faster twist from Pac-Nor seems like a good investment so be SURE the long heave bullet will shoot well for you. And the faster twist still does perfectly well with the 250 grain bullets too.

But for me, I choose the 9.3 because I have excellent accuracy from my Ruger's 1-10" twist with all bullets so far, and 1-12" is a very easy twist to get for no extra money. 9.3MM also can be had from weights as light as 220 and as heavy as 320. I have finished my 9.3X57 now and I am going to finish my 9.3X62 this year. Both have 1-12" twist barrels.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,951
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,951
Originally Posted by Pre64
Yes it would. I'll post that in another thread. Just tying to see what's worth my time and energy and what's not.

Customs are never worth the time, energy and expense if your main concern is recouping expenses down the road. The best way to get your money back is to buy a used gun at a good price.

Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,951
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 11,951
Originally Posted by custombolt
For me a 9.3X62 seems most suited for a commercial 98 large ring Mauser. 35 Whelen seems most at home on an American action like a model 70.

^^ This ^^ ..... A 9.2x62 and 7mmMauser in a couple 98s would be a very fitting combo.

Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,924
O
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
O
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4,924
Originally Posted by Pre64
I'm an 86 Lever and Ruger 5 shot guy. To convert and restore those pays well and the value typically increases. Hence the questions about Bolt guns...

Work on bolt guns rarely increases their value unless you start with something that’s already rare, and even then, most rare bolt guns quickly get a lot less valuable if you mess with them. It's not hard to find a bolt-action 35 Whelen or 9.3x62 that matches your build sheet for less than $2,500.

Originally Posted by Pre64
I am considering some things here. Resale value and desirability factor being equally important. The rifles are going to be built on FN Commercial Mausers and stocked in Exhibition Grade wood. With Match grade cut rifled barrels. Have open sights, full rust bluing and nitre blued appointments. Quick detach bases and rings with a quality optic. Would love to hear opinions....

Much good advice thus far, especially about http://www.hallowellco.com/magazine.htm I’d also add https://stevebarnettfineguns.com/.

Most people still see bolt guns as hunting tools, so even classics have to compete with the latest stainless/synthetic Remchester. A bolt gun’s intended use determines its desirability, and its resale value is based on the chance that someone else sees the same problem that you did and wants to solve it the same way. Generally, the more stuff you add to a bolt gun, the less of your original investment will come back in resale.

It’s easy to see the intended use for the rifles on the Hallowell and Barnett sites: some are museum pieces meant to remain unfired after proofing, others have gone hunting and taken game. My guess is that all of them are priced at 60% of build cost if not less. Also, most of these guns have been on these sites for several months, so the owners are probably open to negotiation on price. About the only ones that increase in value are the ones made by guys who died, because they're not making guns anymore.

Also, how you execute details matters far more than the build sheet itself. Most rifles on the Barnett and Hallowell sites have the build sheet you described. But notice how Barnett and Hallowell tell us which rifles use off-the-shelf rings and bases, swivels, and other parts, and which rifles use parts made and fitted by hand. Then check out the price differences between rifles with each type of appointments. Then check out Gunsinternational and Gunbroker, where hundreds of rifles also match that build sheet. Many of them lack checkering, the finish on the wood and metal is uneven, the wood-to-metal fit is sloppy, their off-the-shelf parts have been screwed on without fitting, etc. So, yeah, details.

Finally, there's the matter of taste. Both Barnett and Hallowell have superb photographs of their wares, starting with undistorted full-length shots of both sides of the rifle. Buyers get an overall sense of the rifle and what the maker had in mind. These shots show the overall proportions of each rifle, how the lines of the stock flow with the lines of the metal, and whether the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Other shots show details of metal and wood work, especially checkering and engraving. All of that stuff has to add up and match what the buyer had in mind, so the more you do, the more the pool of potential buyers shrinks.

In classic-style bolt guns, all of these things drive resale value far more than the build sheet.


Okie John

Last edited by okie john; 08/26/17.

Originally Posted by Brad
If Montana had a standing army, a 270 Win with Federal Blue Box 130's would be the standard issue.
IC B2

Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 662
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 662
Big fan of 7X57's as well. Great round in both rimmed and rimless. Big issue with buying used is waiting for the right combo. Then, you have no time to think. Sweet deals in cool calibers go quick if they are priced reasonably.


Life is brief. Treat yourself. You earned it.
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,049
B
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
B
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 48,049
Originally Posted by Pre64
How about the value of one on a Pre64 Model 70 Magnum Action in 375H&H? Bet that would be worthwhile....



I'd be all over an original pre 64 model 70 375H&H far quicker than I would a custom built pre 64 375. However, the custom would probably be worth less/less money, unless you got a big name builder involved... Leave the pre 64 alone and build on a plentiful mauser 98. IMHO.... By the way, if you are building on a Mauser 98, it's a "no brainer" to choose the 9.3x62mm.... Just sayin.. You are also getting a lot of damn good advice here from the other guys...


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.
Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.

BSA MAGA
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,834
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,834
Quote
Custom cars, custom guns...the original builder/owner loses close to 1/2 his original investment, no matter how clean.


Pretty much the truth there, unless you run into one of the less than expert, "Gun Experts" in a Cabela's gun library. Then you might come closer to 75% or more. LOL


I never thought I'd grow up to be a grumpy old man, but I did, and I'm killin' it.
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

613 members (160user, 1lessdog, 1beaver_shooter, 007FJ, 10gaugemag, 1936M71, 64 invisible), 2,357 guests, and 1,237 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,825
Posts18,477,900
Members73,944
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.096s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8392 MB (Peak: 0.9191 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-29 23:04:58 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS