Outside of works well and plays well with others I don't see how that's much of a drawback. Legal analysis is legal analysis and that's what law professors do. And she must have published so there's a record of how well she does it.
The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh
Kennedy was a swing vote that blew whichever way the wind was from.
I'm in favor of a strict Constitutionalist that believes the Constitution was written as it was meant, and that the meaning has not wavered or changed with time.
The beef is that she is 1) die-hard Catholic (not "just" Catholic)and 2) has VERY little fed court experience. What do we REALLY know about her views on the 2nd and immigration??
She's not just a Catholic.
She's a Charismatic Catholic:
It's a cross between Catholicism and Pentecostalism, to include the speaking in tongues.
People of Praise, which describes itself as a 'charismatic, ecumenical covenant community,' encourages speaking in tongues, prophesy, and healing by the joint laying on of hands, none of which are in the mainstream traditional practice of the Catholic Church.
The organization appoints a 'personal adviser' for each member to help guide the member's decisions on marriage, career and other life choices.
Members are also encouraged to confess personal sins, financial information and other sensitive disclosures to these advisors – who were until recently known as 'heads' for males and 'handmaids' for females.
Advisors are allowed to report these admissions to group leadership if necessary, according to an account of one former member.
Husbands are also considered authorities over their wives, according to the group's beliefs.
The group's ultra-conservative religious tenets helped spur author Margaret Atwood to publish The Handmaid's Tale, a story about a religious takeover of the U.S. government which is now a hit TV show, according to a 1986 interview with the writer.
... n a New York Times article last fall, some judicial experts questioned whether such a group could have an impact on Coney's judicial decisions.
'These groups can become so absorbing that it's difficult for a person to retain individual judgment,' said University of Pennsylvania law professor Sarah Barringer Gordon.
Alleged former members also posted on one blog site to describe the group as cult-like and damaging to mental health.
Anybody who “speaks in tongues” is straight up kooky dooks and not fit for service on any judicial bench.
Maybe she just likes the wine and crackers?
“Life is life and fun is fun, but it's all so quiet when the goldfish die.”
I still can't get any of you guys to tell me where in the heck she stands on the 2nd and immigration. I'm not looking for another "swing" vote in the SC.
Trump's still got a majority in the Senate. No reason to waste a pick on a "crap shoot". Tell me she's FOR the 2A (which I can't find any evidence of) and I'll support her. Otherwise, don't waste this chance.
Little "dicky Durbin, and Fienstein are performing for their constituents. Personally I'd like to see someone that we know is pro 2A up front, and strong on the border the next time around. Let Amy replace Ruthy when she falls in her soup bowl. Let the dems think they switched Trump on Amy with their views, but if they blow it, on his first pick, she's a strong second choice. Get the next one in now. Amy will get her shot. I think she's a good candidate. Truth is NO ONE KNOWS. Even Reagan only got one conservative out of three. Judges are going to be a surprise even to the president.
NRA LIFE MEMBER GOD BLESS OUR TROOPS ESPECIALLY THE SNIPERS! "Suppose you were an idiot And suppose you were a member of Congress... But I repeat myself." -Mark Twain
Outside of works well and plays well with others I don't see how that's much of a drawback. Legal analysis is legal analysis and that's what law professors do. And she must have published so there's a record of how well she does it.
I still can't get any of you guys to tell me where in the heck she stands on the 2nd and immigration. I'm not looking for another "swing" vote in the SC.
Trump's still got a majority in the Senate. No reason to waste a pick on a "crap shoot". Tell me she's FOR the 2A (which I can't find any evidence of) and I'll support her. Otherwise, don't waste this chance.
![[Linked Image from i.pinimg.com]](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/98/b6/d8/98b6d863a5f722b551cd8e1440bd2bd4.jpg)