Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Q

All that exclusion is in reference to Political Activity Code Part 733.

Ok so the President can allow an appointed DOJ member the right to run for a Political Office or even support someone who is.

Nope, read it again.

Sessions cannot be restrained from is duties and obligations as Attorney General based on the Hatch Act, he is exempt.

But none of that matters because he has no intention of doing so anyway.

He and his DOJ just filed a lawsuit barring His President from, "Declass" (as Q puts it) the unredacted FISA documents he was ordered to deliver to Congress.

Not only did Sessions refuse to deliver subpoenaed documents, he now has doubled down on his obstruction by claiming His President would be obstructing Justice if he were to "Declass (as Q puts it).

OK, lets say for the sake of argument, that according to the Hatch Act Sessions has his hands tied and cannot arrest anyone that might influence an election.

1) when does this grace period for criminals begin?
What is the specific time frame we talking about here?
How many days/weeks before an election does the Hatch Act restrain the AG from doing his job?

2) Define "influence an election"?
As Illegal Immigration is a political Hot Potato right now, would arresting and deporting Illegal Aliens before the Midterms be considered "Influence"?
Would arresting a Big Money Political donor like Harvey right before the Midterms be considered "Influence".

3) How about the Fake Bomber? He is deeply involved in politics and his actions (if true) are indeed designed to influence an election. Would the current FBI/DOJ investigation and plastering the results of that investigation all over the media be considered "Influence"? Should the FBI and the DOJ be required to wait until after the Midterms to investigate and arrest according to the Hatch Act? How about arresting him, isn't Sessions and our LE bound by the Hatch Act to refrain from arresting anyone that might influence and election? His arrest not only will influence, it is specifically designed to do so.

4) What about the two Republican members of Congress Sessions indicted? Did those indictments happen before the "time frame" specified in the Hatch Act? If during Hatch Act time frame restrictions, would not those indictments against Republicans be considered "influence" and illegal?

This is getting way over my head. Ha!

Not really, when you put things into perspective and understand what the words actually mean.

How about a Hypo..., lets say that Beto gets drunk again and smashes his vehicle into a light pole this afternoon.

Officer K22 is dispatched to the scene and arrests Beto for drunk driving, resisting arrest and trying to bribe officer K22.

He is put into K22's squad and hauled down to the station for processing. When the DA gets wind of this he orders Beto released, chastises K22 for arresting a politician to close to the Midterms as he would be in violation of the Hatch Act. His arrest would have an impact on the outcome of the election, therefore his arrest would be considered Illegal.

Yup, that is how ridiculous the claim that Sessions has his hands tied due to the Hatch Act.

When this statue was written there was no internet or even TV. The term influence was directed to specific activity such as bribery and intimidation of voters and politicians and Not at Public Opinion..


It does not and did not restrict Law Enforcement from carrying out the legal obligations.

I think the key term here is "who determines policies" Im No lawyer an may be wrong but the DOJ doesnt determine policy but enforces fed law.. As far as comey an the clinton email scoop ,, he didnt think she could loose and all his "boys" were the heads of intel,, they could contain his actions ,,

It was signed into law in 1939, but has been amended since then. I believe you know that.

As Whip the OP stated, this thread was started to inform us of what is going on that the MSM isn't telling us and yes, Fox News is included in MSM. Nothing more, nothing less. If some are frustrated with Qanon and frustrated with any misdirection they do, all I can do is give you what I think is going on based on researching I have done in the past and currently. Nothing more. If some choose to challenge it or not believe it, that is ok.
So why doesn't Sessions order the DOJ to turn over information? Damned if I know.............factually. Do I think there is much more to it...............you are darn tootin' I do. It could be nothing more than attempted misdirect so the DS won't catch on or it could be that the info was turned over but mums the word.
Most of the video's saying this or that about the DOJ, Sessions, ect. are from Fox News. I do not trust Fox News to be any more than more talking heads. Some will say, but I heard Hannity (wearing his CIA lapel pin) ask this question and Congressman so and so answered with this...................yada yada yada. Some of these electronic specialist rival David Copperfield.
Maybe the real question is this, why doesn't Congress arrest Sessions and the others and force the turnover of information. You know, search warrant and all that junk. Why????

Yes, I am aware.
The Amendments are available online and elsewhere.
Please post the Amendments to the Hatch Act that support your contention that Law Enforcement cannot do their job and Arrest, Indict or Prosecute during a specific time frame around election day.

You posted that Sessions could not "arrest" anyone involved in this spygate mess because of the Hatch Act.
Complete and utter Bullshit, nonsense, this was not Q that posted such BS it was YOU, posting crap in order to justify the BS that Session is limited to what he can and cannot do.

Fox did NOT Report that Sessions did not deliver the subpoenaed Documents, Fox published a LIVE INTERVIEW with a ranking member of the House Committee stating flat out that NO Documents were delivered.

If you want to talk facts, then lets do that, don't post crap and BS.

Sessions cannot arrest because of the Hatch Act, get real.

You need to go back and reread what I posted. Then reread my last post and see if maybe you can figure out where I was going it.

So; the synagogue shooter was a Q follower?

Nope..
https://www.zerohedge.com/sites/def...lic/inline-images/gab2.png?itok=5xKKosEV

I still think the sessions/DOJ stalling on revealing to house commitie is a smokescreen,, Steve, your free to believe watever you want,, I cant back my statment up with facts, but somthing about it smells like a trap,, Glad to see u taking the time to research an put the effort in,,

OK, if it is a smokescreen, Why?

Why the need to form a Phony adversarial relationship between President Trump and Sessions?

The Democrats and the Media are not going to luv some Sessions because of some Phony smokescreen, especially when this "smokescreen" is advertised all over the web.

Does anyone really think that if Sessions indicts a few Republicans, refuses to comply with Congressional Subpoenas, files lawsuits against the President, obstructs congressional investigations and supports the Deep State Coup against President Trump, that the media will sit back and say" Hmmm, Sessions is a good guy so we should trust him and luv him", after he is "unleashed" and drops these 50K indictment on the Deep State? Does anyone actually believe this?

Look what happened to Comey.
He stood in front of God and everyone and said "Hillary" would not be prosecuted.
With that he got more Democrat and Media luv than Sessions could ever hope for.

Then Comey stands in front of God and everyone and says that he is reopening the Clinton investigation, and before he could finish his news conference the Democrats and the Media hated him more than any other man on earth.

Thern when President Trump fired Comey, all of a sudden he was the most luved man on earth.

Does anyone actually think that the democrats and the Media are going to luv some Sessions and stick with that luv after he becomes unleashed.

That is just plain crazy, there is no loyalty in the Democrat party or the Media.

What we do know is that
Sessions has indicted two Republicans, these two will lose their House seats.

Sessions and his DOJ filed a lawsuit blocking President Trump from Declassifying documents. Many including Q have said that declassifying these documents was key in the Republicans October surprise needed to win the Midterm battle.

Well, so far Session has not only sabotages two house seats, he has shut down the Presidents ability to drop the Declass Bomb before the Midterms.

As they say, "With Friends Like That, Who Needs Enemies".

I find myself in agreement with you. I'm afraid the psy-ops is not aimed at the enemy...it's aimed at us.

I am still prepared to be wrong about it, and to be ecstatic over being wrong. I sure ain't feelin it though.

I'm Q

This got me to thinkin about these so called 50+K sealed indictments.
If they are real, how do we know that they are indictment against members of the Criminal Organization known as the Obama Administration, corrupt Democrat Politicians like Feinstein and Schiff, officials in the Corrupt FBI and DOJ, and not indictments against "us" and the patriots that are trying to save America?

So far, the first two to come down the pike from Sessions are against Republicans. Not a good sign.