Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunting Rifles Any reason to go with "stainless"...other than looks?

Amen to that, Brother!

I did quite a bit of research before my last rebarreling job from the barrel makers themselves and the final word seem to be that there is no difference in accracy or barrel life. Many of the competitive shooters like stainless because them change barrels often and there's no hassel with rebluing. Like it was already stated, if your going to hunt in the rain or live in a humid area, you may consider it. I have one rifle in a 338-06 that is just for those rainy, wet hunts and is SS and tupperware. All my other rifles are blue and wood.

I hunt in a rain forest on the coast and dont clean my rifle Sept. through Nov.

Jamie

I hunt in the swamps, and frequently scuba dive with my guns and havent cleaned them since 1987...

Every firearm I currently own is either SS or tenifer finished (Glocks), less my AR's (which when rebarreled will have SS) and a few scatterguns.

I don't like the looks any better than blued or CM'd, but SS is less apt to show dings and exhibit rust. True...they are only stain resistant and still able to rust, but not as easily as the above options.

A bit more costly, but well worth the few extra bucks. My time is better spent doing other things and not worrying so much about SS firearms is a relief in itself. That's not to say that anything made of SS doesn't need proper care as well....it surely does....just less often and to a lesser degree.

Wow! I did not know that! Send some down here for our peanuts, cotton, and soybeans.

We get 50 plus inches a year in rain. I have seen a number of stainless rifles with more rust on them than any blued rifle I've ever owned.. I'm assuming that most of those weren't cared for properly.

But this year a hunting pard of mine bought a ss Howa in 7mm. He really tried to take good care off this gun. He cleaned and stored the same exact way I do my blued rifles and couldn't keep the rust off.

FYI, every year I take care of my guns in the same manner and I've never had a rust issue. At the end of every hunting day I have a cloth or sock that I've sprayed firearm lubricant on and wipe down the parts. Takes less than a couple minutes.

My blued versions look flawless!! On extended hunt's with severe weather I take a sock or rag that I've sprayed with firearm lubricant or even WD40 keep it in a ziplock baggy and wipe it down.

Never had a problem. Bottom line even stainless rusts if you don't treat it.

I could put my blued featherweight away without wipeing it down for a couple days right next to my pards SS/Howa and his would have more surface rust.

I 've seen and heard of other SS rifles with the same type issues.

I finanly now have a new SS -06 and a SS .260 that I'll treat just like my blued version and I'll bet my SS rifle will still look better than most.

You gotta take care of your weapons stainless or not!

Back to thread topic. For me a ss/walnut rifle is orgazmic!!

Heck, I say get stainless and then put one of the good coatings on it! That should give some added insurance.....I think. I've seen rust thrive under paint, but can't say with any confidence that the coatings don't share those same characteristics as paint.

Black ice over stainless works for me.

Yeah, cd, "you gotta take care of your weapons stainless or not." I've learned the hard way that some people have either very salty perspiration, or acid perspiration on their hands, and if they handle a SS rifle, rust is the inevitable result, if it hasn't been wiped down with an oily rag after one of those individuals handles the rifle. It is easy for me to forget this fact, since I can handle my guns without any problem at all, and never give it a second thought, but if others do, rust can result.

I concur with what you said about SS/walnut. Said rifles make my putter flutter!

Not all "stainless" is equal....

Some of it is even magnetic. And some is not.

Depends on the alloy contents.

And I drive slowly in the left lane and have had my right blinker on since 1987.

I find it comical that the title of this thread included the words, "other than looks." Stainless steel is for rust resistance. "Looks" comes in blued steel and walnut, IMO.
_

The only thing that I've ever heard of that is garenteed to rust within 30 seconds on being within 2 miles of any water is the trigger assembly on a Browning A-Bolt!!!!!!!!!!!

Didn't bring up A-bolt because I thought the discussion was about rifles........

Yep, 303 is non-magnetic, but 304 is magnetic as is all of the 400 series.

I guess the decision to go stainless vs CM is just a personal choice. I do know that all CF benchrest shooters use SS barrels, as it can be machined to tighter tolerances. But, for me and a hunting/sporting rifle, NOTHING looks better than a rust blued, Walnut stocked rifle, so it's CM all the way. The kind of rifles that Forrest B showed us about a year ago. They were my kind of music. Or, the ones Bob Owen made.
YMMV

Don

I've spent my in entire working career in the machining trade and never did encounter any stainless steel that was easier to machine than carbon steel or that would hold closer tolerances.
Carbon steels are much easier to machine than SS. Hence the higher prices for stainless barrels. The cost isn't all in the material.

Yeah, that's what I was thinking.