Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
#13528481 - 02/04/19 2009-14 Ford F150 Ecoboost  
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 341
tansinator Online content
Campfire Regular
tansinator  Online Content
Campfire Regular

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 341
Chattanooga, TN
Google "weep hole" modification to intercooler. Mine was idling rough and surging when passing. This fixed the problem immediately. I have since talked to two friends with the same truck that have had this problem and fixed it as well. Takes less than five minutes to do but I do suggest changing the spark plugs as well.


Eagle Lake, Mississippi is close to heaven.

"Everything Hipsters touch turns to chit........Period..
Whisky.....Beer.....Tobacco.....Boots....Clothing....Gear......you name it..
Good thing the fuggers don't like firearms.." Fieldgrade

300 BP

#13545005 - 02/09/19 Re: 2009-14 Ford F150 Ecoboost [Re: tansinator]  
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 341
tansinator Online content
Campfire Regular
tansinator  Online Content
Campfire Regular

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 341
Chattanooga, TN
Really surprised no one else has had this problem. Seems very common.


Eagle Lake, Mississippi is close to heaven.

"Everything Hipsters touch turns to chit........Period..
Whisky.....Beer.....Tobacco.....Boots....Clothing....Gear......you name it..
Good thing the fuggers don't like firearms.." Fieldgrade

#13545116 - 02/09/19 Re: 2009-14 Ford F150 Ecoboost [Re: tansinator]  
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,216
Windfall Offline
Campfire Regular
Windfall  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,216
WI./FL.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the F-150's first offered the EcoBoost engine starting in 2011 along with the new 5.0. Seeing those new engines coming down the line in 2011 is why I bought my 2010 with the proven 5.4 engine. The 5.0 has had a better track record than the EcoBoost, but my old 5.0 F-150 was such a dog that I wanted no part of that size engine in a truck again.


My other auto is a .45

The bitterness of poor quality is remembered long after the sweetness of low price has faded from memory
#13550979 - 02/11/19 Re: 2009-14 Ford F150 Ecoboost [Re: tansinator]  
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 38,629
tzone Online content
Campfire Oracle
tzone  Online Content
Campfire Oracle

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 38,629
Just The Tip
Yeah, I guarantee you it's not a problem with 2009 Eco-boost motors. lol


It ain't always the deer you're after.
#13550981 - 02/11/19 Re: 2009-14 Ford F150 Ecoboost [Re: Windfall]  
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 38,629
tzone Online content
Campfire Oracle
tzone  Online Content
Campfire Oracle

Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 38,629
Just The Tip
Originally Posted by Windfall
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the F-150's first offered the EcoBoost engine starting in 2011 along with the new 5.0. Seeing those new engines coming down the line in 2011 is why I bought my 2010 with the proven 5.4 engine. The 5.0 has had a better track record than the EcoBoost, but my old 5.0 F-150 was such a dog that I wanted no part of that size engine in a truck again.



You were not comparing apples to apples with the two 5.0 motors. COMPLETELY different animals.


It ain't always the deer you're after.
Alpha

#13551115 - 02/11/19 Re: 2009-14 Ford F150 Ecoboost [Re: tansinator]  
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 792
ajmorell Offline
Campfire Regular
ajmorell  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 792
Santa Fe, NM
Other than displacement, there's nothing similar about the 2 and the '18+ don't even have that in common anymore ('18+ are 307 cu in vs 302).

#13551344 - 02/11/19 Re: 2009-14 Ford F150 Ecoboost [Re: tansinator]  
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,967
JMR40 Offline
Campfire Tracker
JMR40  Offline
Campfire Tracker

Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,967
Georgia
I hang out at f150forum.com a bit and that is a common problem to come up over there.

The 5.4 has a poor reliability reputation. The 2011 and newer 5.0 is a MUCH better engine in every way. Mine is a 2014 and it has more power than any truck I've ever owned, and gets the best fuel mileage than anything but the Tacoma. And the Tacoma only beats it by about 1 mpg. It isn't close to the performance of the old 302.

I don't want to start a pissing contest over the 2 engines. The 3.5 EB engine certainly puts out a lot of power at low rpm's and I've seen nothing to indicate it won't last as long as the 5.0 V8. It is a high performance engine that costs more up front,and it needs more expensive maintenance, and more often than the V8. Plus needs premium fuel to attain the advertised torque and HP numbers and doesn't get any better fuel mileage.

For what I do, and the light loads I tow the 5.0 made more sense to me. If I towed more weight, especially at altitude then I'd have bought the 3.5 and just paid for the performance.


Most people don't really want the truth.

They just want constant reassurance that what they believe is the truth.
#13551554 - 02/11/19 Re: 2009-14 Ford F150 Ecoboost [Re: tansinator]  
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 36
victory06 Offline
Member
victory06  Offline
Member

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 36
midwest
JMR40 - What is its tow capacity and fuel mileage (without tow) of your 5.0? Thanks

#13551571 - 02/11/19 Re: 2009-14 Ford F150 Ecoboost [Re: JMR40]  
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 792
ajmorell Offline
Campfire Regular
ajmorell  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 792
Santa Fe, NM
Originally Posted by JMR40

The 5.4 has a poor reliability reputation.


I'd challenge that assertion. I don't believe the 5.4 had any worse reliability than any of it's competitors of the same vintage save maybe the Toyota 5.7. Did it have some design flaws, sure - cylinder heads on the 2V versions and spark plugs on the 3V versions but there are a lot of 5.4 equipped trucks out there with 200k+ miles running around that never experienced any of those issues. Is the 5.0 better? Yeah, but again, it's a much more evolved design...it's not really a fair comparison.

#13551663 - 02/11/19 Re: 2009-14 Ford F150 Ecoboost [Re: tansinator]  
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,216
Windfall Offline
Campfire Regular
Windfall  Offline
Campfire Regular

Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 1,216
WI./FL.
More torque lower on the rpm scale is why I went with the 5.4 over the then new 5.0. Just like my old blue truck with the 5 speed and 5.0/302, that newer motor has more horsepower, but it gets it from higher rpm's just like my old one. I don't pull anything all that heavy and the torque converter with the automatic makes my 5.4 do everything that I need a truck for. Many a time I ended up grabbing that 4wd low range lever without locking in the hubs (and I miss those too) just for more power and less speed with that old 5.0. It was a great engine in my old Mustang, the F-150 truck not so much.


My other auto is a .45

The bitterness of poor quality is remembered long after the sweetness of low price has faded from memory
Bravo

#13563159 - 02/14/19 Re: 2009-14 Ford F150 Ecoboost [Re: tansinator]  
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 341
tansinator Online content
Campfire Regular
tansinator  Online Content
Campfire Regular

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 341
Chattanooga, TN
I had a 5.4 and got 360,000 trouble free miles out of the vehicle. All I did was change oil, filters and brakes. I only changed the spark plugs one time as well.

Last edited by tansinator; 02/14/19.

Eagle Lake, Mississippi is close to heaven.

"Everything Hipsters touch turns to chit........Period..
Whisky.....Beer.....Tobacco.....Boots....Clothing....Gear......you name it..
Good thing the fuggers don't like firearms.." Fieldgrade

#13568761 - 02/16/19 Re: 2009-14 Ford F150 Ecoboost [Re: Windfall]  
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 29,914
bsa1917hunter Offline
Campfire Oracle
bsa1917hunter  Offline
Campfire Oracle

Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 29,914
Orygun
Originally Posted by Windfall
More torque lower on the rpm scale is why I went with the 5.4 over the then new 5.0. Just like my old blue truck with the 5 speed and 5.0/302, that newer motor has more horsepower, but it gets it from higher rpm's just like my old one. I don't pull anything all that heavy and the torque converter with the automatic makes my 5.4 do everything that I need a truck for. Many a time I ended up grabbing that 4wd low range lever without locking in the hubs (and I miss those too) just for more power and less speed with that old 5.0. It was a great engine in my old Mustang, the F-150 truck not so much.


Once again, you are comparing apples to donuts with the old and new 5.0 motors. Like tzone and JMR already said, they are not even in the same league and yes, the 5.4 has had its share of problems. So much in fact that if given the choice between the 2 different engine types, I'd choose 5.0 and never look back, well unless I wanted to see you in my rear view mirror...


Originally Posted by raybass
I try to stick with the basics, they do so well. Nothing fancy mind you, just plain jane will get it done with style.

Originally Posted by Pharmseller
You want to see an animal drop right now? Shoot him in the ear hole.
P


BSA

Moderated by  RickBin, SYSOP 

AIH 160
Who's Online Now
876 registered members (10gaugemag, 01Foreman400, 10ring1, 12344mag, 160user, 87 invisible), 1,835 guests, and 421 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod









Copyright © 2000-2018 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
 
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.136s Queries: 14 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9752 MB (Peak: 1.1999 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2019-02-20 01:50:08 UTC