|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,378
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,378 |
MELLO, mellow. Nothing wrong with asking questions and talking about manufacturing.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,856 Likes: 3
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,856 Likes: 3 |
MELLO, mellow. Nothing wrong with asking questions and talking about manufacturing. I've noticed a rather non-mellow character to MELLO's posts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,668
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 6,668 |
MELLO, mellow. Nothing wrong with asking questions and talking about manufacturing. I've noticed a rather non-mellow character to MELLO's posts. Too much Mello Yello I suspect. Or perhaps mellow yellow (quite rightly).
'Four legs good, two legs baaaad." ---------------------------------------------- "Jimmy, some of it's magic, Some of it's tragic, But I had a good life all the way." (Jimmy Buffett)
SotG
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,738
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 1,738 |
That's right, I haven't heard anyone posting here proclaiming they are barrel makers but just asking for info. And the part about errors when measuring rifling twist, Shinbone got results of a twist faster than the manufacturer indicated. When a patch (no matter how tight) is pushed or pulled through a rifled barrel, it's rotation can indicate less rotation from slippage , but can never rotate faster than the actual twist of the barrel. So, if you measure a twist rate slower than the manufacturers spec, the patch might have slipped a bit in the rifling or your measurement may be correct. If you measure a twist rate faster than the manufacturers spec, you are most likely correct that the twist is faster than manufacturers spec. It doesn't take a barrel maker to figure that out. RJ
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,378
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,378 |
My guess is that the manufacturer changed the barrel twist mid-run, and that change was too minor to make it into the marketing materials; or, they got a deal on a bunch of 1:8.5 barrels in and figured that was "close enough" to 1:9 to simply go with them.
|
|
|
|
665 members (1234, 1beaver_shooter, 160user, 10gaugemag, 16penny, 007FJ, 69 invisible),
2,757
guests, and
1,380
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,216
Posts18,485,508
Members73,966
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|