|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,959
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,959 |
Do I have anough guns to be a rifle loony? Does not having a 6.5 prevent me from being a rifle loony?
Yes it does, no self respecting Sako looney would ever be without an older 6.5x55. It along with a 9.3x62 are the ultimate Sako rifles So since I have a Sako in 9.3X62 but no Creedmore I'm ok? Whewww, what a relief! Getting close with the 9.3x62 but getting the classic 6.5x55 is a must As my only 6.5X55 at the moment is a Howa 1500(not a bad rifle) I was hoping you wouldn't bring that up, Gerry! I need to start frequenting gun shows more often and maybe I could pick up an older Sako in a Swede?
Last edited by 340boy; 04/30/19.
"For joy of knowing what may not be known we take the golden road to Samarkand." James Elroy Flecker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24,678 Likes: 44
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 24,678 Likes: 44 |
Kirk,
Who has accused you of not being a rifle loony because you don't own a rifle chambered for a 6.5mm cartridge? Give me some names and I will personally hunt them down and stuff photos of your rifles up their, uh, noses.
Thanks for watching my back...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612 |
Is this a bad time to mention my Sako is a 270 Win?
Gerry.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,959
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,959 |
Is this a bad time to mention my Sako is a 270 Win? Nope. I'd be proud to own one myself.
Last edited by 340boy; 04/30/19.
"For joy of knowing what may not be known we take the golden road to Samarkand." James Elroy Flecker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,653
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,653 |
Ive got 2 Tikkas...both 270 win. Never a bad time to mention a Sako
GOD Bless America
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612 |
Is this a bad time to mention my Sako is a 270 Win? Nope. I'd be proud to own one myself. We have a Tikka 6.5x55 though so it's not quite a Sako but still acceptable. I must confess though no 9.3x62 here but I do have a 35 Whelen in a Rem 700 though
Gerry.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,751 Likes: 6
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 9,751 Likes: 6 |
Sakos are great guns. As a result of reading this thread, I think I'm gonna get a single shot 6.5 Grendel. It's the one in the middle. The cartridge, not the rifle!
Safe Shooting! Steve Redgwell www.303british.comGet your facts first, then you can distort them as you please. - Mark Twain Member - Professional Outdoor Media Association of Canada
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,224 Likes: 9
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 37,224 Likes: 9 |
It's interesting in theory but I think very few people would actually ever use 160 gr Weldcores in the 6.5 Creedmoor
There's no reason not to - it's no different than the 6.5x55 that bullet was designed for. It's far and away the best bullet for elk, moose, and big plains antelope in the 6.5mm offering consistent pass through and a wide wound channel combined with a BC sufficient for long range use. If people choose not to use it, that's their own mistake. The vast majority of the time, listening to your advice is an even bigger mistake. That's nice. You've been an ignorant joke in nearly every thread I've seen you in. Do you practice, or does knowing nothing come naturally to you? Choosing between you and JG will be really easy.. DF
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 5,179
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 5,179 |
The 6.5 CM is a relatively new cartridge. The, dare I say, venerable?.270 Win. has been proven in the game fields worldwide for almost a century now. For decades, the which cartridge is better debates have raged on and on. Most recently the 6.5 CM vs. practically all cartridges and yet we still hear and read about .270 vs. .280, .270 vs. .30-06, .308 vs. .30-06, .300 WM vs. 7mm RM etc..... The 6.5 CM fanboy talk is heard on my club range, at work, at the LGS's and around the hunt camps in the area. The same 'drivel' (facts, yes facts stating the marginal superiority of the 6.5 CM, that in practical use mean virtually nothing) that Bob spouts is heard repeatedly. Many, around here, like him, have apparently imbibed copious quantities of the 'extra strength' CM Kool Aid. I'd wager that 99% of the CM fanboys have never shot there CM's past 200 yards (most not past 100) and don't have many opportunities to do so where they hunt, especially around here. Is the CM a good hunting round? Yes. Does it kick a lot of other hunting rounds to the curb? No. The ranges where the CM starts to excel past the others are so long that less than 2-3% of hunters should even attempt those shots. The main advantages I see for the CM are lots of different rifles are available, lots of really good factory ammo and recoil is very mild. One of my favorite hunting rifles is my Sako AV Classic Hunter in .270. I also own two 6.5x55's and a .260 Rem. so I see no need or want for a CM. That said, if I run across a rifle I really liked chambered for the CM there is a possibility I might buy it. I'm a rifle looney and I've done stranger things. If I could only have one rifle for deer sized animals it would probably be my .270 Win. or lately gasp! my .270 WSM. For larger game I'd opt for one of my more suitable rifles. UH OH! I just did it myself.
Some people are educated beyond their intelligence.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,959
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 21,959 |
Is this a bad time to mention my Sako is a 270 Win? Nope. I'd be proud to own one myself. We have a Tikka 6.5x55 though so it's not quite a Sako but still acceptable. I must confess though no 9.3x62 here but I do have a 35 Whelen in a Rem 700 though Well, I *guess* we can forgive you for that?
"For joy of knowing what may not be known we take the golden road to Samarkand." James Elroy Flecker
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313 |
There isn't any dangerous game in most of North America, so bumping into old griz isn't a consideration for most American and Canadian hunters.
Exactly. It's about 600 miles from where I typically hunt to the nearest grizzly as the crow flies. If I was somewhere I needed a grizzly stopper and still wanted some long range big game performance from the same load I'd use the 8mm WSM with 220gr. Weldcores (it was born for that application). If I was just worried about stopping a grizzly and not hunting a deer species at the same time, I'd take the .50-110 or .416. The 6.5mms and to a lesser extent the .270s are suitable for elk sized game. The 6.5s do it far better, but then we knew that.
Last edited by Llama_Bob; 04/30/19.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,144 Likes: 6
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 23,144 Likes: 6 |
What's ironic, in my case, is I was a huge devotee of the 6.5x55 and ballyhoo'ed it to anybody foolish enough to let me near them. After messing with Swedish Mausers for ten years I glommed onto one of the very first Winchester XTR M70 Featherweights that were chambered for the round, back in '85 or '86, I don't remember. That fueled my proselytizing of the 6.5x55 even more, often making my point by comparing it to the .270. Jeezuey, I think the longest kill I made with it was 150 yards, maybe. Nowadays I would rather hunt deer with a .30-30 bolt gun or Savage .303 and cast lead bullets, so there. I predict that trend to be the "Next Big Thing". Or not. If I get another 6.5 it'll be a 6.5x55 (I have a line on a #1 single shot in that caliber), or a 6.5x54 Mannlicher-Schoenauer, or both. I'll probably shoot cast bullets out of them too if they come to pass. ELD/VLD means absolutely nothing to me, no matter the cartridge it's launched from. That's not to say I'm not enjoying this thread- I do like hearing what's on other folk's minds.
"You can lead a man to logic, but you cannot make him think." Joe Harz "Always certain, often right." Keith McCafferty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,612 |
Is this a bad time to mention my Sako is a 270 Win? Nope. I'd be proud to own one myself. We have a Tikka 6.5x55 though so it's not quite a Sako but still acceptable. I must confess though no 9.3x62 here but I do have a 35 Whelen in a Rem 700 though Well, I *guess* we can forgive you for that? Thank you I appreciate it. I do also have a Sako currently in 7 mm RM but that's off the topic here lol.
Gerry.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,653
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,653 |
far better...your a trip
they don't do anything far better than anything except sell guns magazines to the millennials and tacti-[bleep].
Id like to hear any possible scenario where a 6.5 does anything far better in the hunting fields to say...500 yards.
GOD Bless America
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,653
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,653 |
GOD Bless America
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313 |
Id like to hear any possible scenario where a 6.5 does anything far better in the hunting fields to say...500 yards.
Easy - the 6.5s have higher sectional density and thus better penetration on big game starting at the muzzle. You don't have to get to any distance to see the benefit of shooting a 6.5 over a .270. Load up the 160gr .264 Weldcore, and you've got one of the best big game bullets on the planet and there's no .277 equivalent usable in factory rifles.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,534
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 12,534 |
Id like to hear any possible scenario where a 6.5 does anything far better in the hunting fields to say...500 yards.
Easy - the 6.5s have higher sectional density and thus better penetration on big game starting at the muzzle. You don't have to get to any distance to see the benefit of shooting a 6.5 over a .270. Load up the 160gr .264 Weldcore, and you've got one of the best big game bullets on the planet and there's no .277 equivalent usable in factory rifles. Yeah, so what? The .270 will still kill anything the 6.5 will, as a practical matter, at the ranges most folks shoot (under 400 yards). That's what it's all about, anyway. Will it kill your critter at the distances most folks shoot? Yes it will, end of story. End of argument, period. A few BC points here or there, or SD points, don't matter a bit. Good bullet construction is what counts, and being smart enough to shoot within the distances you can make a good hit. Anything else is just bullcrap.
You can roll a turd in peanuts, dip it in chocolate, and it still ain't no damn Baby Ruth.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,653
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,653 |
Show me an animal you would hunt with a 6.5 that a .270 won't shoot through with ease. Ive seen .270s blow out the far side of moose...id venture a guess that a 150g A Frame or any of the monos would too.
exit wounds are exit wounds
again...its the people
GOD Bless America
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,313 |
Yup, ignore those inconvenient facts Some of us prefer the superior performance of the higher-SD 6.5mm bullets. The 160gr Weldcore consistently gives an exit on elk even on shoulder shots, which can't be said for anything expanding in .277. It's simply superior.
Last edited by Llama_Bob; 04/30/19.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,653
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 2,653 |
GOD Bless America
|
|
|
|
123 members (35WhelenNut, 7mm_Loco, 673, 264mag, 44automag, 450yukon, 18 invisible),
1,011
guests, and
994
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,977
Posts18,519,888
Members74,020
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|