Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Q

If the traitors were shot it would be safer. Most believe nothing will happen.

No doubt. It certainly is what this fight for Freedom we are participating and/or viewing in is all about.
My concern is how many will we lose on the battlefield. Hard to see those you love, those you are friends with, or those you admired and trusted fall. Tis a hard thing.
Faith is the key.

LOL
So now Mueller is a White Hat, today, for awhile. Tomorrow he will be a Black Hat, again, for awhile, till he is a White Hat, again.

Got it.

You dumb ass, don't put words in my mouth, I didn't say that. I'm beginning to believe you are a shill.

Well, you believe Q is going to save the world, as long as we "trust the plan", wait, and keep waiting, so...

Oh, I almost forgot.
“When You Resort To Name Calling, You’ve Lost The Argument”

Keep up the good work.

Ignore is your friend, you're only feeding the troll.

Steve,, Got it? No,not even close,, Your to in love with your own opinion to see the big picture,, and as far as Q saving the world? Another wiff, The one an only Plan to save the world is Gods plan, and POTUS T is His sword,,Q is only a voice over narrating the events an previews to patriots so we keep our sheit together and help the rest of the sheeple out of the mud,, Trust Gods plan to save the word have faith that DJT is being inspired to implement this plan, and if it helps ya, pretend that morgan freeman is narrating Qs drops

LOL
So now Mueller is a White Hat, today, for awhile. Tomorrow he will be a Black Hat, again, for awhile, till he is a White Hat, again.

Got it.[/quote]

You dumb ass, don't put words in my mouth, I didn't say that. I'm beginning to believe you are a shill.[/quote]
Well, you believe Q is going to save the world, as long as we "trust the plan", wait, and keep waiting, so...

Oh, I almost forgot.
“When You Resort To Name Calling, You’ve Lost The Argument”

Keep up the good work.[/quote]

I won't bother answering the "trust the plan" part, Hosfly did a great job doing that.
Name calling? Oh no, is that suppose to make me feel bad? Or is that another one of those distraction paths when you have nothing more?
Funny how you can name call but others can't. Control issue?
The original purpose of this thread was to keep those who were interested informed of what the non MSM side was saying and or doing. I think Whip told about his experience at a Trump rally with the Secret Service and the Q entity. It has bloomed into much more than that, including an anti Q movement which the DS loves to see. A house divided cannot stand theory is what they wanted.................. Divide and conquer, a tactic that has worked very very well for them. It is the very root of how this country got into the mess it is in.
It is becoming very obvious to me that if anyone posts something concerning Trump, Q, The Plan, ect. showing it in a positive picture, you and some others are going to make sure to attempt to change it to a negative.

While I have never did it, Bludog probably gave me good advice with the ignore bottom idea.

Steve4102, I have been, and am still, supportive of your healthy skepticism on this thread, but have you stopped to think what the reaction would have been if Barr had prohibited Mueller from speaking? Contrary to your sarcastic characterization of Mueller as a white hat, it seems to me that letting him speak allowed the country to see what a large-size Black Hat he really is.

Can you image the reaction if the traitors were shot?

Both President Trump and AG Barr said they would allow Mueller to testify before Congress.

That means making an opening statement and then answering questions about his investigation and his opening statement.

By allowing him to conduct a press conference based on opinion and speculation violates America’s basic foundation. That all Americans are presumed innocent until Proven guilty.

We as Americans are inherently Innocent of any and all crimes until such time that we are found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. We cannot allow government officials to discard this basic principle and turn our system upside down by declaring a person guilty first, then demanding that person prove his/her innocents.

What Mueller did was not only unethical, it was a violation of Donald J Trump’s Rights.

Yes it should have been stopped, but it wasn’t, ask yourself why.

Read

https://townhall.com/columnists/chrisstigall/2019/05/30/a-dirty-doj-cuts-both-ways-n2547067

Ha, just read this,

who, at the very least, are destroying the basic premise of American jurisprudence by claiming that perps must prove their another one, and that if a prosecutor can’t exonerate them, they may as well be guilty?

Folks, that’s not us. That’s not the United States. That’s not our criminal justice system. It’s the exact opposite. If they can get away in the process, if they can get away with changing the…

Your natural state as a citizen of this country is you are innocent of criminal allegations of anything. The natural state… This is part of the founding of our country.

In rogue dictatorships, in nations of tyranny, the citizen is guilty from the get-go. The citizen is always guilty.
The powerless are guilty. It is their permanent state. That’s one of the reasons for American exceptionalism. The citizen in this country, is — in his natural state — innocent.

When such time as prosecutors at various state, federal, local levels come along and think somebody committed a crime, it is incumbent on them to prove it. The accused does not have to prove he didn’t do it. Now, sometimes in trials you have to do that in order to persuade a jury.

But in our system, the presumption of innocence and the demand and the requirement for proof beyond a reasonable doubt is what separates us.
And if these people get away with reordering that, they will have succeeded in getting away with politicizing, criminalizing political differences.

As in, “You are a conservative. You’re guilty! You are a Republican. You’re guilty!” They are standing long, traditional, time-honored jurisprudence on its head here.

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2019/05/30/the-stakes-for-our-country-have-never-been-higher/

https://voat.co/v/GreatAwakening/3250352 Good read here,,

Im with you snake,, after trial or tribune, those guilty should be the nxt day,hung or shot,, If we dont start making the punishment so horrific that the evil doers hearts quiver,then they will just keep on keeping on,, we have to get away from "violating personal rights"by not executing... AND hold Lawyers accountable for their bullshit verbal vomit and use of verbiage to throwor disclaim law,,, "what does "is" mean" adding or ommiting a word or phrase can an does do more harm to our constitution by totally twisting its true meaning,Not to mention letting the guilty off,,even with other undeniable proof and evidence,, if ya dont say it right and write it down right then their civil rights are violated, the guilty should be hanged often and frequently and repeatedly

And not allow any part of the Constitution to be amended from the original amendments.

What was wrong was what Mueller said, not the fact that he was "allowed" to speak. I don't recall if he had the press conference before or after he resigned from the DOJ. If before, he should have waited. If after, then as a private citizen he has the right to call a press conference. As the link makes clear, Mueller's words showed that there is a double standard of justice at work here: One standard for Clinton, and another for Trump. That's what's wrong, not the fact that he spoke to the press.

Did Mueller convict Trump of something?
No

Did a judge convict Trump of something?
No

Was there any sort of a trial?
No

Did Mueller basically stand and read a prepared statement?
Yes [and AG Barr quickly rebuked that statement and has witnesses to back it].

Doubt we hear much[if anything] from Mueller again.

AG Barr was not required to release the Mueller report. It was a confidential report from Mueller to Barr and nobody else. Barr and Trump made the decision to make the report available to congress and ultimately the public.

Mueller worked for the DOJ and any and all information gathered and documented during his employment by the DOJ is DOJ property. Any further release of information must be authorized by the executive branch.
Think McGahn. Even though McGahn is no longer employed by the executive branch, President Trump ordered him to not testify before congress and to ignore a congressional subpoena . Mueller cannot speak or comment on this without DOJ or Trump permission.

Why are non of the others involved in the Witch Hunt not holding press conferences, voicing their opinions as to what Trump did and didn't do? There were 13 angry Democrats running this investigation, why must they secretly "leak" their opinions and not hold a presser?

Cuz they can't, not without DOJ permission.

Why isn't Weisman, the guy that really ran this investigation, publicly slamming Trump and claiming they would have indicted if it were not for the OLC directive?

From SB2 information as posted by Hosfly.................................

"Mueller testifying before Congress would have been carnage.

So? Nadler and Mueller set it up in such a way that Mueller could say just enough to get the impeachment ball rolling, without having to be grilled by Congress. Why didn’t Mueller make this statement earlier? Answer: because Comey’s arrest was not imminent.

The dark stars aligned and it was time for Mueller to forget his most elementary law school classes and suggest that, from now on, each American citizen should seek for a document from the DOJ unequivocally attesting he did not commit a crime. Our 12 year FBI Director shamelessly says this:

“And as set forth in the report, after that investigation, if we had had confidence that the president clearly did not commit a crime, we would have said so. We did not, however, make a determination as to whether the president did commit a crime”.

and cowardly says that:

“Now, I hope and expect this to be the only time that I will speak to you in this manner. I am making that decision myself. No one has told me whether I can or should testify or speak further about this matter”.

Well, sorry Bob. If there are impeachment hearings, I’m pretty sure many republicans in Congress will want to hear a little more from you before sending the ball to the Senate for immediate deflation…

Q2582 These people are stupid. Q

One last thing I need to clarify about Mueller is his meeting with POTUS when he wanted the FBI Director job.

Q challenges us and says:

Q1285 “Congress passed Public Law 94-503, limiting the FBI Director to a single term of no longer than 10 years.” Reconcile. Q

In this article, we discover Mueller was appointed FBI Director by Bush 7 days before the 9/11 terrorist attacks and exceptionally served 12 years at the post. HUSSEIN sought a two-year extension to Mueller's term given “the nation's heightened concern about another attack”. Look how Comey lovingly supported it: video.YouTube

So Mueller gets the job a few days before 9/11, organizes the 9/11 investigation cover-up and gets a 2 year extension because there supposedly was a threat of another attack which did not happen. Okay…

Are you aware of the 9/11 S.Res.610 resolution in Q2328?

With what you now know, do you see it?

I told you John Kerry was Bin Laden’s handler and Comey was ISIS’ Baghdadi’s.

The only way Mueller could have had the FBI Director job again is if he and his buddies in the Intelligence Community played the same extension card and convinced Trump that there were concerns about an attack.

Trump did not fall for it. There was no way he would have handled this supposed attack with U1 Mueller at the helm. He had true patriots in the Team available for that.

The next day, Rosenstein appointed Mueller Special Counsel…

Q154 Perhaps someday people will understand ‘they’ had a plan to conduct ‘another’ mass extinction event."

I want him to testify before a senate inq and either exonerate Trump.or malign himself or committ perjury.