|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,262
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,262 |
A really stupid question.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,652
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,652 |
Even a Nightforce will lose zero with a dual windage screw rear base
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,748 |
I dropped a rifle out of a tree stand. Rifle still shot perfect. That was a rather old Burris FFII 4.5-14.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,401
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 13,401 |
A really stupid question. I don't think so. Kind of an important question actually.
Dog I rescued in January
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,639
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,639 |
A really stupid question. I don't think so. Kind of an important question actually. 😃 How about no drop or hit but sonic vibration from rifle standing in corner of the bedroom, 80 year old farm house. Turn on 100 watts RMS to a pair of K-Horns. Awesome bass vibrations. Scope was a foot off next day. So it is a stupid question.
Swifty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,840
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,840 |
"Doggone it, I missed that buck. Musta bumped my scope." Translation - "I didn't bother to check my zero cuz Scooter down at the big box store said he bore sighted it to be dead on from 25 yards to as fur as I could see a deer."
Chronographs, bore scopes and pattern boards have broke a lot of hearts.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,089
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,089 |
While perhaps not a stupid question, it's one that can't be answered.
Back when I published my first hunting optics book in 1999, the publisher insisted I use some information from DEVA, the quasi-governmental German organization that tests a lot of hunting (and other) equipment. Among the supposedly scientific DEVA tests (which included measuring light transmission) was one involving a rubber hammer. After sighting-in a rifle, they'd whack the scope a few times in"strategic" places, to see if it changed zero--but they whack American scopes more, because (they noted) they were more likely to lose zero.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,639
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,639 |
While perhaps not a stupid question, it's one that can't be answered.
.
Perhaps the most logical statement in this entire thread.
Swifty
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,785
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,785 |
I'm trying to get a feel of just how much, or little of a bump will effect zero on a rifle with scope. Some examples of actual changes of zero and how much of a bump caused it would be helpful. thank you. Troll
"I didn't realize we had so many snipers in this country." by J23
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,924
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,924 |
While perhaps not a stupid question, it's one that can't be answered.
Back when I published my first hunting optics book in 1999, the publisher insisted I use some information from DEVA, the quasi-governmental German organization that tests a lot of hunting (and other) equipment. Among the supposedly scientific DEVA tests (which included measuring light transmission) was one involving a rubber hammer. After sighting-in a rifle, they'd whack the scope a few times in"strategic" places, to see if it changed zero--but they whack American scopes more, because (they noted) they were more likely to lose zero. I have that book.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 544
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 544 |
I had a hunting buddy of mine slip on ice and go down hard on top of his rifle. He rechecked his zero after the hunt and it was still right on. Scope was a Leupold. He had scratched up the rifle some as well.
What really impressed me is that he would not take a shot at any game after he fell that day for fear that his zero was messed up and he might wound instead of kill. He waited until he went to a range and checked it out on paper first.
He deserves high marks for hunter ethics.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,924
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,924 |
When I was 17 my 30-06 was knocked over on the concrete porch at the Cabin. It fell right on the 4X Bushnell. That Sportview was dented but it was still right on the money!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,359
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 12,359 |
Not very scientific, but I will say that if you lose your footing, and somersault and then tumble about 80 or 90 feet down a steep, rocky slope ( losing your rifle off of your shoulder on the first or second bounce), your rifle will definitely need to be sighted in again. It may also need some cosmetic attention, especially if it happened to land muzzle first on at least one bounce, and the scope will likely need to go back to the manufacturer for service. Dang, you don't do things halfway Ben!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 576
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2013
Posts: 576 |
Let me try to re-phrase my question with a bit more detail: We're not always in the type of situation where it's convenient to check zero by shooting: sometimes you're back in the bush and simply don't want to shoot in the area you're hunting. If you have a severe fall, I'd do it anyway. But how about a more minor fall of the rifle: say you've leaned it up against a tree or large rock and it slips off onto the ground. This is with a good quality scope and mount properly mounted. Just trying to get a feel of how such a relatively minor fall would likely effect zero. thanks for the responses.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 88
Campfire Greenhorn
|
Campfire Greenhorn
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 88 |
I think experience with your own equipment, if you'll excuse the expression, is the best guide. I have personally seen both ends of the spectrum, but can say I have full confidence in my current setups. If the scopes aren't broken I trust they are still on. This would be with VX3i and Burris signature zees. I have broken my fall on rock with the turrets and not seen a zero shift. I try not to baby my rifles throughout the year while practicing, this should show any issues before crunch time.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,238
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 14,238 |
Let me try to re-phrase my question with a bit more detail: We're not always in the type of situation where it's convenient to check zero by shooting: sometimes you're back in the bush and simply don't want to shoot in the area you're hunting. If you have a severe fall, I'd do it anyway. But how about a more minor fall of the rifle: say you've leaned it up against a tree or large rock and it slips off onto the ground. This is with a good quality scope and mount properly mounted. Just trying to get a feel of how such a relatively minor fall would likely effect zero. thanks for the responses. All the more reason to use quick release rings and carry another scope sighted in with you.
Its all right to be white!! Stupidity left unattended will run rampant Don't argue with stupid people, They will drag you down to their level and then win by experience
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 544
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 544 |
I would think that a rifle leaning against a tree and falling over on to the forest floor should not be a problem at all. I've had that happen and there was no change of zero that I detected.
Modern brand name scopes and mounts are made better than they've ever been and are pretty rugged and it's expected that there will be the occasional bump.
If scopes lost their zero from mild shocks then a lot of hunters would be going back to irons.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,475
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 57,475 |
Tasco, almost imperceptible bump. Bushnell pretty good bump. Leupold hellava bump.
Or, never had a Bushnell loose zero until it died. Leupold lost zero for no explainable reason. Tasco on rifle managed to fall out when someone opened truck door and landed on running board on bell end with large ding then on gravel road. Never lost zero. You simply never know. First shot in my first ever Zeiss in the 80s., something broke inside, it was toast. I've seen Tasco go TU in a few shots, and had one particular one on an AR, and thats HARD recoil on a scope because it comes from the recoil and then the bolt slamming home is like an airgun, that lived I can't tell the number of rounds before it died as a test scope.
We can keep Larry Root and all his idiotic blabber and user names on here, but we can't get Ralph back..... Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, over....
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,924
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,924 |
I had an H&R Handi Rifle in .223 that I put a Bushnell 3-9X on. The scope would lose zero just by snapping the action shut. It wasn't a Sportview either it was their midline scope.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 19,205
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 19,205 |
Many, many moons ago, I was climbing a tree on the opening morning of deer season, with my rifle slung over my shoulder. It slid off, and I heard it banging against the limbs on the way down. I probably dropped it about 15 feet. Checked the zero later on that day, and it hadn't changed a bit.
By the way, the scope was a Tasco World Class, so, so much for Tasco always being junk.
|
|
|
|
527 members (1moredeer, 1beaver_shooter, 1minute, 1Longbow, 1lessdog, 10gaugemag, 63 invisible),
2,595
guests, and
1,378
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,191,448
Posts18,470,996
Members73,934
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|