24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 1
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 9,429
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by Goosey
[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


It's weird how scientists can all agree humans are causing global warming, but among the general public (eg, dopes) opinion closely correlates with one's political party.

It's clearly not about the science as far as the public is concerned. It's just about what they happen to agree with.

In this case, the Democrat position supports the scientists, and Republicans cherry-pick and turn a blind eye:

[Linked Image]


NINETY-SEVEN PERCENT OF SCIENTISTS







You have not made one scientific argument yet. You are only parroting the media's talking points and posting simplistic cartoons. Do some research on where the "97% of scientists" comes from. Even if it were 97% of scientists so what? Truth has no regard for consensus.


Always remember that you are unique, just like everyone else.
GB1

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 4
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by Goosey
It's like a bad parody reading climate change threads on here. The stupidity would be funny if it didn't have the potential to lead to our extinction.

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


Little problem there sport with your cartoon. Ratios are off a bit.

Life of a species is no different than life of a person. No species and no one gets out of it alive. Everyone dies and every species goes extinct eventually.

So the chicken little sh/t doesn’t float.

Climate is changing. No doubt. As my old major-professor used to say. It’s biology, nothing stays the same and things are constantly changing.

To state that it is DIRECTLY BECAUSE OF us and our actions is a bit presumptuous.


Montana MOFO
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 4
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,980
Likes: 4
Originally Posted by KyWindageII
I have personally observed glaciers melting in Alaska over 25 years, and the increase of flooding on the Florida coast during the same time. This of course is due to “sunspots” not carbon, correct?


I don’t know.

Let’s use some critical thinking.

Last time glaciers melted and flooding increased, were there more or less carbon emissions than now,

Were there more or less sunspots?

Were there more or less volcanic eruptions?

Last edited by Tarkio; 06/12/19.

Montana MOFO
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,269
Likes: 2
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10,269
Likes: 2
It's funny.....the same people crying "man made climate change" are also the ones ramping up the old "no nukes" chatter. Nukes are the answer to both global warming (if it exists and is a problem) and the need for affordable and renewable energy. But, because Trump has now pushed the idea, the leftist media and its followers are against it. There is no comparable downside to bringing the current nuclear generation technology online, yet the warmists are not demanding it. And we should believe them?


Lunatic fringe....we all know you're out there.




Page 3 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24



74 members (35, 1Longbow, 808outdoors, 6mmCreedmoor, 13 invisible), 14,591 guests, and 1,012 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,195,108
Posts18,541,924
Members74,057
Most Online21,066
May 26th, 2024


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.307s Queries: 22 (0.011s) Memory: 0.8151 MB (Peak: 0.8492 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-28 08:26:39 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS