24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 296
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 296
finally got a response from those I've voted for.

Bunch of crap IMO.

I say screw the informal agreement and tell Senator Menendez to pound sand. He's just trying to stall this until Trump is out of office.

Reply below:
--------------------
Hi James,

I wanted to follow up on the email you sent our office regarding International Traffic in Arms Regulations. I did some checking and got the following update:

In a February 26, 2019, letter (attached) to Secretary of State Michael Pompeo, Senator Menendez wrote that he has placed a "hold on the congressional notification" of the USML transfers described above. The Senator invoked the authority contained in AECA Section 38(f), which requires the President to notify the HFAC and the SFRC at least 30 days before removing any article from the USML. Such notification must be "in accordance with the procedures applicable to reprogramming notifications under section 634A(a) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961." These reprogramming notifications do not require congressional approval, but there is an informal arrangement by which committee Members can place a hold on the notice . According to the letter, Menendez's hold, which prevents the USML changes notified on February 4 from taking effect, "will remain in place until such time as" issues concerning Congressional review and 3D Gun Printing "are sufficiently addressed." A State Department official told CRS on June 19 that the status of the USML categories remains unchanged.

Please let me know if you have questions or would like to discuss this further.

Thanks,

Jack Wagon senator's letter:
[Linked Image] Menendez hold_Page_1 by JAMES ANDERSON, on [bleep]

[Linked Image] Menendez hold_Page_2 by JAMES ANDERSON, on [bleep]

[Linked Image] Menendez hold_Page_3 by JAMES ANDERSON, on [bleep]

[Linked Image] Menendez hold_Page_4 by JAMES ANDERSON, on [bleep]

[Linked Image] Menendez hold_Page_5 by JAMES ANDERSON, on [bleep]

Last edited by JRGunmaker; 06/19/19.

gunmaker
------------------
Custom Metalsmith & Stockmaker
GB1

Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,638
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 24,638
Twist?


[Linked Image from i.imgur.com]

WWP53D
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,426
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 10,426
Oh, BLANK you, New Jersey.


Up hills slow,
Down hills fast
Tonnage first and
Safety last.
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 296
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 296
wasn't Menendez supposed to be in prison?


gunmaker
------------------
Custom Metalsmith & Stockmaker
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,187
M
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
M
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,187
Originally Posted by SKane
Twist?


Left hand ,maybe?


TB, CWD and Covid-19 , free so far.....
IC B2

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147
Why should we care about regulations that prohibit shipping firearms and ammunition outside of the U.S.?

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 296
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 296
Cause since obummer the state dept wants $2250/year from gunsmiths. with the potential of millions in fines if we do not comply.


gunmaker
------------------
Custom Metalsmith & Stockmaker
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147
Originally Posted by JRGunmaker
Cause since obummer the state dept wants $2250/year from gunsmiths. with the potential of millions in fines if we do not comply.


Is this what drove I,T&D out of business?

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,170
G
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
G
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,170
As we who live in Canada know, these regulations were put in place long before Obama and became more onerous during eight years of GWB. I like to be able to blame the Democrats for everything too but once the bureaucracy gets their teeth into something, party lines are meaningless. The State Dept. got the ability given to them and they ran with it. Because they have learned, over the years, how things work, they started small, with regulations which were not too difficult to follow, then rapidly increased the requirements until it made it nearly impossible to do business. Typically, there were some businesses which were largely OK with this for two reasons: they could afford it and they welcomed the elimination of some competition.
The thing is, ITAR is a prime case of the government interfering in the marketplace. Free enterprise is a myth. Cabelas paid a big fine for shipping some scope rings. A dealer in New Mexico paid a big fine he couldn't afford for sending a target scope to Canada.
The whole business is not about preventing arms sales to foriegn countries; it's about controlling the trade and the merchants within the US. All aspects of the arms trade are under attack and those who ask, "Why should we care?" are complicit. Ultimately, small business takes the hit because nobody cares enough to try and prevent it or correct it.
When the regulations first came into effect, they were not really advertised and were not enforced. Business figured, "If we just keep our heads down, maybe it will go away". Well, it didn't go away but those who wanted to export stuff thought, "What the heck, we can handle it", and they could; until the regulations got worse. Today, I wouldn't want to try and start gunsmithing in the US and I quit gunsmithing in Canada when I could no longer buy barrel blanks or scope mounts without a bunch of hassle, extra costs, and permits.
Gun Control happens on many fronts and ITAR is one of them. GD

Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 303
A
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 303
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
Why should we care about regulations that prohibit shipping firearms and ammunition outside of the U.S.?

Because for every bit of these regulations that cover normal sporting rifles (and I mean Rem700, Ruger No.1, Model 70 type rifles, not AR15 clones) prevent free market access by American manufacturers to the global market.

There is a much bigger market out there than the US, but it has costs added to it that make American products dis-proportionally expensive when compared to those made in other parts of the world. Some idiot is going to say "but American is better!". No. No it isn't. As good as maybe, better in isolated circumstances, maybe. Better in general? Have you looked at the standard of American manufactured products lately? Leupold, Remington, etc. tell a different story.

Hot tip, the rest of the world makes actions, barrels, sights, scopes, bullets, brass, etc. and they make damn good ones for less than an American one costs in Europe, Australia/NZ and Africa. Hell most of the popular powders for reloading are made in Australia, Canada and Switzerland!

US products cost more, but do not usually offer a quality that is measurably better. That cost differential is down to ITAR compliance costs.

IC B3

Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 296
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 296
Originally Posted by Adamjp

US products cost more, but do not usually offer a quality that is measurably better. That cost differential is down to ITAR compliance costs.


While I agree the ITAR fees are a $#!t sandwich, I would intensely disagree concerning the level of quality. The high end custom rifle world I live in has loads of competition here in the US. It's a fun hobby for so many very talented smiths that do it just for fun and don't have to make a living at it. Many, probably most of these, don't have all their ducks in a row when it comes down to registering with the state dept every year for $2250. Hell many don't even have an ffl or tax license. This surplus of talent pool not having to play by all the rules keeps the price of high end customs much lower than the average world market. In europe they don't hand out FFLs like candy and keep the number of gunmakers at a much lower level. This eliminates competition and drives the prices to a much higher average than in the US. Due to the massive amount of competition in the US, the quality of the top makers is second to none on the world stage.


gunmaker
------------------
Custom Metalsmith & Stockmaker
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 303
A
Campfire Member
Offline
Campfire Member
A
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 303
Originally Posted by JRGunmaker
In europe they don't hand out FFLs like candy and keep the number of gunmakers at a much lower levelhi. Ts eliminates competition and drives the prices to a much higher average than in the US. Due to the massive amount of competition in the US, the quality of the top makers is second to none on the world stage.

I was mainly talking components, not finished rifles/shotguns.

For those, well we will have to disagree.

If I am looking for a high end custom rifle be it a Dangerous Game CRF or double, or a nice balanced deer hunting rifle European (and English) makers make the best rifles in the world, a spectacular fusion of wood, metal and balance. It is the same for shotguns. As you note, in these countries being a dealer is not the same as being a gunsmith. The second is a qualification earned through hard work and demonstrating complex skills, much more than registering for an FFL and trade account with Brownells.

If I was looking for a Western Sheep rifle I would look to an American builder as the Europeans just don't seem to get light, robust and packable. They also don't get varmiters and precision (aka PRS style rifles) as this is not a style of hunting practiced in much of Europe.

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,147
Every American manufacturing niche has its own trade association to look out for its interests and to lobby for it in WDC. If American firearms and optics manufacturers feel that this is causing them harm, why aren't they and the NRA fighting, or fighting harder, for it to be revised?

I live in the U.S. and don't have any reason to buy American products over seas. When I go to Europe, I take what I need to take and buy whatever I need/want to buy on the local economy. I don't see the link between declining American manufacturing quality and their higher costs over seas.

Years ago, Savage and Anschutz had an agreement where Anschutz firearms were imported and sold in the U.S. as "Savage - Anschutz" and Savage firearms were exported and sold in Europe as "Anschutz - Savage". The only American sporting firearms that I ever saw in West Germany were owned by U.S. military service members and had been purchased thought the morale and recreation outdoor sports programs.

If the comments on this site truly reflect the sporting rifle universe, the Finnish Tikkas are currently thought of as the best standard production high volume centerfire rifles, better than those made in the U.S. by Marlin, Remington, Ruger, Savage, and Winchester.

Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,962
J
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,962
It is my understaning that the requirement for ITAR certification only applies to companies, dealers and gunsmiths who intend to EXPORT or IMPORT firearms and or parts.

Last edited by jk16; 06/22/19.
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 296
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 296
Originally Posted by jk16
It is my understaning that the requirement for ITAR certification only applies to companies, dealers and gunsmiths who intend to EXPORT or IMPORT firearms and or parts.


doesn't matter if you ex or import. if you thread a barrel, or do just about any kind of gunsmithing state dept says you need to register $2250 a year.

This was all going to go away until the jacka$$ sen from NJ who allegedly frequents the Dominican Republic in search of underage hookers wrote the stupid letter above.

quick summary here
https://mobile.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201804&RIN=1400-AE30


gunmaker
------------------
Custom Metalsmith & Stockmaker
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 32,130
Originally Posted by JRGunmaker
Originally Posted by jk16
It is my understaning that the requirement for ITAR certification only applies to companies, dealers and gunsmiths who intend to EXPORT or IMPORT firearms and or parts.


doesn't matter if you ex or import. if you thread a barrel, or do just about any kind of gunsmithing state dept says you need to register $2250 a year.

This was all going to go away until the jacka$$ sen from NJ who allegedly frequents the Dominican Republic in search of underage hookers wrote the stupid letter above.

quick summary here
https://mobile.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201804&RIN=1400-AE30



From your link...

“Therefore manufacturers and exporters of only items transitioned from the United States Munitions List to the Commerce Control List, such as most commercially available firearms and ammunition, will no longer be required to register or pay a fee as part of compliance with U.S. export controls.”


Originally Posted by 16penny
If you put Taco Bell sauce in your ramen noodles it tastes just like poverty
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 296
Campfire Member
OP Offline
Campfire Member
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 296
Originally Posted by kingston


From your link...

“Therefore manufacturers and exporters of only items transitioned from the United States Munitions List to the Commerce Control List, such as most commercially available firearms and ammunition, will no longer be required to register or pay a fee as part of compliance with U.S. export controls.”


Hey you read the link!
It's a very big deal and great for US gunsmiths and customers of them if it gets past that jc&@$$ letter posted above.


gunmaker
------------------
Custom Metalsmith & Stockmaker
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,520
K
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
K
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 1,520
Originally Posted by 260Remguy
Why should we care about regulations that prohibit shipping firearms and ammunition outside of the U.S.?

Because the Obama admin says it applies to gunsmiths as well. But as written it could also be construed to cover ammo and components,the private sale of guns, casting bullets, reloading even for personal use and the “publishing” and “dissemination” of information on guns/ammo which would cover most of the posts on here and just about every thing dealing with guns and ammo you could imagine It’s the most insidious form of under the table gun control if it isn’t stopped.

Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,483
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,483
I've been waiting for the day when the ITAR charade gets eradicated. It makes it a real chore to get scopes, rifles, barrels, bullets, and just about everything else that we enjoy from the US.

Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,665
B
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
B
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,665
Originally Posted by Jordan Smith
I've been waiting for the day when the ITAR charade gets eradicated. It makes it a real chore to get scopes, rifles, barrels, bullets, and just about everything else that we enjoy from the US.

You and me both, brother!

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

660 members (160user, 10gaugemag, 10ring1, 1badf350, 007FJ, 1936M71, 65 invisible), 3,180 guests, and 1,348 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,191,372
Posts18,469,290
Members73,931
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.144s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9033 MB (Peak: 1.0867 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-04-26 00:59:52 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS