24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 608
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 608
140gr Berger Classic, CCI BR2, and 60gr H4831SC in Norma cases gets me 3,000 fps even in the 24" barrel of my Blaser K95.

I get 6-shot groups of less than a m.o.a up to 500 meters, the furthest I have tested them.

I get the same accuracy with Nosler's 140gr BT and Sp12 (Ramshot Magnum being its US version) at 3,040 fps. and better accuracy still with Berger 130gr Classic and H4831SC at 3,130 fps . My load with the 140gr Berger's is my favourite, though, as accuracy is plenty and its BC is the best of the three.

HR IC

Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,525
Likes: 2
7
79S Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
7
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,525
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Remington280
Following the
Originally Posted by 79S
I use rl 26 with 145 eld-x.


Following, any load data.


My model 70 5 digit with factory 24 inch barrel
145gr ELD-X
60.5gr of RL 26
FED 210
R-P Cases
avg velocity 3222 F.P.S
I measure base to the ogive and its 2.750
Velocity measured with a RCBS chronograph, set up 14 feet away.


Originally Posted by Bricktop
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego.

Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,525
Likes: 2
7
79S Offline
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
7
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,525
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
I just got done with an article on new powders and bullets for the .270. Reloder 26 works very well with 145-150 grain bullets, but with lighter bulles Alliant lists higher velocities with RL-16 than either 23 or 26. Got superb accuracy and high velocities using RL-16 with 130-140 grain bullets. But there are several other good new powders as well.

Should also note, for traditionalists, that there have been four versions of H4831 since the mil-surp stuff ran out in the mid-1970's. If you're continuing to use H4831, it is NOT the same powder you started with way back when.


Maybe it's my cheap chrono but it seems h4831 is getting slower over the yrs.


Originally Posted by Bricktop
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego.

Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,190
J
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,190
Originally Posted by 79S
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
I just got done with an article on new powders and bullets for the .270. Reloder 26 works very well with 145-150 grain bullets, but with lighter bulles Alliant lists higher velocities with RL-16 than either 23 or 26. Got superb accuracy and high velocities using RL-16 with 130-140 grain bullets. But there are several other good new powders as well.

Should also note, for traditionalists, that there have been four versions of H4831 since the mil-surp stuff ran out in the mid-1970's. If you're continuing to use H4831, it is NOT the same powder you started with way back when.


Maybe it's my cheap chrono but it seems h4831 is getting slower over the yrs.


It's not your chrono. My current lot of H4831 is much slower than the previous.

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,418
C
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
C
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 1,418
Well I have been handloading the .270 wcf since the 70's - my favorite chambering.
Imo, you cannot beat some of the newer powders, RL 26 is fantastic with heavier jacketed bullets and lighter mono's.
It meters well, doesn't use up space and produces top speeds. I don't use the 4831's any longer.

IC B2

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,662
O
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
O
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 8,662
Originally Posted by Blacktailer
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
I just got done with an article on new powders and bullets for the .270. Reloder 26 works very well with 145-150 grain bullets, but with lighter bulles Alliant lists higher velocities with RL-16 than either 23 or 26. Got superb accuracy and high velocities using RL-16 with 130-140 grain bullets. But there are several other good new powders as well.

Should also note, for traditionalists, that there have been four versions of H4831 since the mil-surp stuff ran out in the mid-1970's. If you're continuing to use H4831, it is NOT the same powder you started with way back when.

Look forward to seeing that article JB. Where will it be published?

+1


Ted
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 1
W
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
W
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 4,188
Likes: 1
+2

Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,935
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,935
Originally Posted by Bayou_Bob

Sounds like there's a few I need to try with my 270. I prefer the 130g bullets over the 150's so RL16 and 23 could be possibilities. Is anyone using the Ramshot powders?


Ramshot Hunter is a great powder in mine. Great velocity and accuracy.

Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,882
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,882
Originally Posted by 79S
Originally Posted by Remington280
Following the [quote=79S]I use rl 26 with 145 eld-x.


Following, any load data.


My model 70 5 digit with factory 24 inch barrel
145gr ELD-X
60.5gr of RL 26
FED 210
R-P Cases
avg velocity 3222 F.P.S
I measure base to the ogive and its 2.750
Velocity measured with a RCBS chronograph, set up 14 feet away.
[/quote

NIce load.


HMM-161, HMM-364
Semper Fi Brothers
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,928
Likes: 13
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 42,928
Likes: 13
Guess I'm the only one who reaches for a can of IMR 4064 or IMR 4895, and a 140 grain ballistic tip...

either one has been working just fine for accuracy for 6 or 7 decades.....


"Minus the killings, Washington has one of the lowest crime rates in the Country" Marion Barry, Mayor of Wash DC

“Owning guns is not a right. If it were a right, it would be in the Constitution.” ~Alexandria Ocasio Cortez

IC B3

Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,342
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,342
Originally Posted by Seafire
Guess I'm the only one who reaches for a can of IMR 4064 or IMR 4895, and a 140 grain ballistic tip...

either one has been working just fine for accuracy for 6 or 7 decades.....

I initially got into 270s back in the very early 1970's. 4064 was in common use and noted for its accuracy.
It worked pretty well with all bullet weights, and I find myself surprised that it seems to be nearly forgotten for this use in todays world. I suspect many of us just had to try new and different powders, and/or got hooked on chasing the max velocity ghost.
I went thru many pounds of of 785, 4831, and 4831SC. Also mixed in there was a gallon jug of MR 3100, and trials with many others.
My constant over most of those decades has been the 130 gr Partition. While that is the bullet I usually hunt with, I have shot up a pile of most everything else available in the marketplace.
Buried in the collection are a bunch of 145 gr AFrames, over MR3100, that are seriously accurate, and make the 270 perform on bigger game like a 300Mag.
Ready for this fall is a good supply 130 gr Partitions and Etips over 4831SC. But right next to them are some 150 gr Partitions over RL26, you know, just in case.
Rational, economical thinking has never been my strong point.


Imagine your grave on a windy winter night. You've been dead for 70 years.
It's been 50 since a visitor last paused at your tombstone.....
Now explain why you're in a pissy mood today.
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,500
Likes: 3
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,500
Likes: 3
Originally Posted by old_willys
Originally Posted by Blacktailer
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
I just got done with an article on new powders and bullets for the .270. Reloder 26 works very well with 145-150 grain bullets, but with lighter bulles Alliant lists higher velocities with RL-16 than either 23 or 26. Got superb accuracy and high velocities using RL-16 with 130-140 grain bullets. But there are several other good new powders as well.

Should also note, for traditionalists, that there have been four versions of H4831 since the mil-surp stuff ran out in the mid-1970's. If you're continuing to use H4831, it is NOT the same powder you started with way back when.

Look forward to seeing that article JB. Where will it be published?

+1



I wish I had found the RL-16 years ago. It's great with the 130TTSX!

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 2
R
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
R
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 2
I loaded up some 150 Speer spitzers and Nosler partitions with R23 the last time I loaded for the 270 Win.


“If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.” Tolkien
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,755
J
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,755
Since I just now really started to wring out a .270, I don't have any old time favorites, not like I do the .280 ( 139sp/55gr/IMR 4831) or 30-06 ( 165 or 168 anything/58gr H or IMR 4350) plus, this current .270 is the first one I've owned that shoots the heavier jacketed bullets so accurate. So I am having a ball with these newer powders, I'm just now learning their eccentricities. I would say that 9 out of 10 .270 users I have grilled in the past 30yrs out here in Utah like the 150gr bullet. The 130 users were handloaders who used partition or Barnes. I know that the majority of the elk killed during our rifle season are cows, spikes, younger rag horns. Very few monster bulls. If you see any magnums they are going to be 7mm Rem Mag, followed by the 300WM. I've only met a handful that use 338s and up. Since my 270 shoots the 160 partition ( 60gr R26) so well, I decided to use it on my cow elk hunt. If not now, when? right?

Last edited by Jim_Knight; 07/14/19.
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,324
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,324
I am planning on tying the 110 TTSX & Accubond in my 270's. After playing with various loads with my .257 Wby shooting 100 TTSX bullets and my 7mm SAUM shooting 120 TTSX & 120 BT's the past 2 yrs.....There is something to be said for these lighter wt for caliber bullets when using a TTSX or GMX and at speeds over 3375 fps. It is basically a "center of mass" hold out to 400 yds and the TTSX & GMX bullets have been very effective at those speeds from 40 yds to 225 yds so far


PASS IT ON!
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315
O
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315
Originally Posted by fishdog52
Originally Posted by Seafire
Guess I'm the only one who reaches for a can of IMR 4064 or IMR 4895, and a 140 grain ballistic tip...

either one has been working just fine for accuracy for 6 or 7 decades.....

I initially got into 270s back in the very early 1970's. 4064 was in common use and noted for its accuracy.
It worked pretty well with all bullet weights, and I find myself surprised that it seems to be nearly forgotten for this use in todays world. I suspect many of us just had to try new and different powders, and/or got hooked on chasing the max velocity ghost.
I went thru many pounds of of 785, 4831, and 4831SC. Also mixed in there was a gallon jug of MR 3100, and trials with many others.
My constant over most of those decades has been the 130 gr Partition. While that is the bullet I usually hunt with, I have shot up a pile of most everything else available in the marketplace.
Buried in the collection are a bunch of 145 gr AFrames, over MR3100, that are seriously accurate, and make the 270 perform on bigger game like a 300Mag.
Ready for this fall is a good supply 130 gr Partitions and Etips over 4831SC. But right next to them are some 150 gr Partitions over RL26, you know, just in case.
Rational, economical thinking has never been my strong point.


Nailed it brother. What the hell is wrong with us? One shot per deer per tag. Why do I have 3 different bullets over various powders loaded in quantity? Because I can I guess. Rational economical thinking does not exist here.


"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315
O
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
O
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 2,315
Originally Posted by C_ROY
I am planning on tying the 110 TTSX & Accubond in my 270's. After playing with various loads with my .257 Wby shooting 100 TTSX bullets and my 7mm SAUM shooting 120 TTSX & 120 BT's the past 2 yrs.....There is something to be said for these lighter wt for caliber bullets when using a TTSX or GMX and at speeds over 3375 fps. It is basically a "center of mass" hold out to 400 yds and the TTSX & GMX bullets have been very effective at those speeds from 40 yds to 225 yds so far


The Tikka really likes the 110 over 4064. Pleasant to be around and accurate too. My daughter will carry the TTSX 110 in her 270 Win for Muledeer this fall.


"Political Correctness is a doctrine, fostered by a delusional, illogical minority, and rabidly promoted by an unscrupulous mainstream media, which holds forth the proposition that it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end."
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 152,350
Likes: 43
Campfire Savant
Offline
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 152,350
Likes: 43
I’ve always used IMR 4350, but you all are making me want to try RL-26.

Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,755
J
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
J
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 3,755
I was very impressed with the 110TTSX and Hunter, and R23 with the 150 NBT.

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,324
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 3,324
Thanks for the "heads up" on Hunter. So far it is the most accurate and obtains the highest velocity in my 7mm SAUM with the 120 gr bullets


PASS IT ON!
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

71 members (300_savage, 24HourCampFireGuy50, 7mm_Loco, 35, 10gaugemag, 9 invisible), 1,707 guests, and 910 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,326
Posts18,526,470
Members74,031
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.118s Queries: 54 (0.026s) Memory: 0.9136 MB (Peak: 1.0172 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-21 08:25:14 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS