Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire If you were on a jury in a murder trial....

...could you overlook this face? The defense in a murder trail in LA is having a problem selecting an impartial jury. I plead guilty. I couldn't be impartial.
JURY

That's a head that needs detached from its support system.

I would have no problem at all being impartial. Feelings don't have a damn thing to do with facts and evidence.

My Granddaddy believed he had the ability to tell if a person was a crook by the way his eyes "set" in his head......tend to frown on people whose eyes were "too close together". He should be around to get a load of that lunatic......probably would say he had "guilty" written all over his face.

You gotta admit that guy wouldn't score high on the credibility scale. And that would (IMHO) be a pretty safe assumption.

The all blue beezer is a nice touch, sort of a reversei Bozo nose. Punch here.

I could do it. I couldn't be impartial on him being an idiot doing that to himself but I could be impartial for the trial.

have the jurors wear those solar eclipse glasses

It depends on what the lawyers asked.

Could I honestly say that I can pass no prejudicial judgement on a man that did that to himself? No. The guy's a damn fool and has something seriously wrong in his head.

Could I be shown the facts of the case and render a not-guilty verdict? Yes. I don't believe any allegation against a man unless it can be proven beyond my doubts. I've been wrongly accused of things in the past--several times in fact. I nearly did not graduate high school, because of a wrongful accusation. You would need far more than a guilty look or a face full of tattoos to convince me the man had committed a crime.

I wonder if he’s ever had a job interview?

I bet that was interesting.

My advice don’t get a tattoo where a judge can see it.

Me to defense counsel: "I have no problem with the defendant's personal choices, it's a free country."

Me to the Devil: "I'll be sending him your way soonest."

And yet lawyers try to get juries to think about everything but the evidence.

Being up against a top notch lawyer in a civil case is not an easy row to hoe. Hired guns is what they are, first come, first served.

Since when is a picture of the defendant part of the jury selection process? I've only had jury duty once and we didn't see the defendant until the trial started. I'd vote guilty for anything this guy is charged with.

I'd call this sewing and reaping.
Do something to purposely make people "fear your person or mind" and you may be successful, but it was his choice so let those chips fall where they may.

Trying to force people to not use common scene so he can have a "fair trial" is one of many thousands of attempts by government to take 100% control over the people it is sworn to be a servant to.
Any society who protects it's criminals, traitors and fools is going to be overflowing with criminals traitors and fools.

Yep.




They can try all they want.

I don't think the tattoos are going to matter. The eyewitness testimony that he did it will probably be enough.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/louisiana-attorney-judge-tattoos-client-double-murder

I could over look it, right before I found him guilty. Wonder which latino gang he belongs to. I think the people who could honestly be impartial need a serious look as well.

How apropos

I'm amazed he survived getting arrested. Let's have a fair trial and a quick execution.
Jerry