|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 28,172
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 28,172 |
I'm considering having a Valmet BBF re-chambered from 222Rem to 223. Since there's no way to set the barrel back, is this too risky? This gun
Hunt with Class and Classics
Religion: A founder of The Church of Spray and Pray
Acquit v. t. To render a judgment in a murder case in San Francisco... EQUAL, adj. As bad as something else. Ambrose Bierce “The Devil's Dictionary”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,185 Likes: 4
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,185 Likes: 4 |
The most likely issue is for the diameter at the shoulder to be slightly large on the original 222 chamber.This means there may be a ridge left when the chamber is cut for the 223. One can take a careful measurement as close to the shoulder as he can get with a hole mike or even a telescoping gauge and find out ahead of time if the chamber will clean up. Once this is ascertained, it only remains to establish the correct ser-up to do the job. GD
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 615
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jul 2016
Posts: 615 |
Why? 222 ammo is readily available, while not as cheap as 223, you will find that the 222 is adequate and very accurate. Plus, the twist rate is slower than most 223's meaning you would be limited to 55 gr or less bullets.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 956
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 956 |
Most likely, they twist rate will be too slow and you will and up hand loading lighter bullet weights. If you're going to do that, you might as well load 222's.
(We answer this in regards to Savage 24's a lot, people want to shoot the easily obtainable, cheap 5.56 ammo)
|
|
|
|
70 members (BALLISTIK, 6mmbrfan, 907brass, Akhutr, 7mm_Loco, 10gaugemag, 8 invisible),
1,474
guests, and
928
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,748
Posts18,495,219
Members73,977
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|
|