Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Evolution Scientifically Debunked

So, I'm interested in when you figure we are going to sprout wings and become a new species?

Let's devise a plan, my grandson and your granddaughter? Is it a go? Wings and a high IQ new species?

Allright,, sounds good. PM me with the winglets location.

I don't think it would sink in no matter how many times it's explained. Dr Jag simply doesn't want to know.

I give it 6 million years, give or take a million

Well, that's a pos cop out.
Come on, fill everyone else in, genius.

Now, tell me about those genetic DNA mutations that result in a new, advanced species. Then tell me about another exactly the same as that one occurring in the same location with the opposite sex at the approximate same time frame that can result in propagation of the the new species.

Your suckers like Valsdad are waiting.

The same way chi mpanzee DNA showed up in your DNA analysis.

https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2012/06/bonobos-join-[bleep]-closest-human-relatives

Now go shave your forehead.

"The theory of evolution does not try to explain the genesis of life, only how life changed after its beginning."

Yep., and how amoebas became humans and how from amoebas other species became extant.

Amoebas became lions and humans and dolphins and redfish.

Darwin came up with this ridiculous BS in 1859. Since then the idea has been psychologically indoctrinated into the retards quite successfully.

Doc,

How old do you think the earth is?

I expect millions of years.

Now, how do you think life started?

Millions, but not billions?

Well, at least you've made it out of the thousands.

Jag, Dr Jag, right?

Last I heard they taught stuff in college like Mendelian genetics and such. You went to college, right?

Last time I studied any sort of genetics, if I'm not mistaken I think I learned that it doesn't take two of the exact mutations to occur in different members of the same species for change to occur. The change can be passed on by one individual. The change doesn't even have to occur in species that reproduce sexually, therefor no need to have two individuals of the same species have the same mutation and live in the same area so as to be near enough to reproduce.

Given enough time, is hard to believe significant changes could occur so as to produce a distinct new species? Not for me at least.

As to watching your video, as I said, I'd read a transcript if one existed. I'm not going to watch 12 minutes to find the truth. "truth" was passed on to me in Parochial School. "truth" was passed on to me in HS and University. "truth" was passed on to me in the school of hard knocks too. Ms Jarret tried to pass the "truth" about Geometry to me in HS, required me to do homework every night and if not turned in 2 points off the quiz score every Friday, said quizzes comprising a large portion of the final grade. I did no homework and lost 10 points every Friday. I also didn't follow her lectures during class, as she was usually going over the homework from the night before. During class I read the next chapter in the Geometry book. I passed the class with a B+ if I recall, because the best I could get was a B every Friday, under her "truth" going at her speed. In "truth" I got an A in the class. Other folks "truth" sometimes is too slow for me to follow. It's like that with a lot of videos.

Jag, some of us are concerned you're starting to go a bit overboard at times. I'm hoping that some of it is fueled by Demon Rum. If so, you may want to pray to the "truth" for some help.

Best wishes for a calm evening.

Geno

Here is a line of reasoning I picked up years ago, not sure where, but it stuck with me.

In nature, we regularly observe distributions. Take grains of sand on a beach, the weight of ducks in a flock, etc. We measure them and find variations around a mean. Graph the data and we see the famous Bell Curve. In some cases we see a Poisson distribution. But in general, we see variations that are predictable.

Now let us consider the relative intelligence of the critters on the earth. Some exhibit little intelligence, like amoebas, slugs, and the like. Then we see a progression to insects, amphibians, reptiles, mammals, and primates. Then 30 standard deviations away we find a critter that is different from all the other critters. This critter builds nuclear power plants and goes into outer space; The premise that this critter is a result of the random mutations of other critters doesn't pass the laugh test. Were it so, that great gulf between this critter and the other critters would be littered with other species exhibiting levels of intelligence filling the gap. Anyone who hand waves this away doesn't understand science. The only way of explaining this is that something outside of the observable system added un-natural intelligence to mankind.

But there were numerous species bridging that gap. We even carry DNA from a couple of such species which interbred with humans.

So, wheres your new species to tout? Yes, and I passed genetics and comparative anatomy and organic chemistry in flying colors. In fact, I was accepted to a graduate school doctorate program a year before getting my batchelors degree.

When I went to graduate with a drs degree the university was in a quandary as I had no BS degree. They ended up having to give me an honorary BS degree or something like that.

I gave you a serious scientific video to see, yet your time was too valuable to perchance learn anything new, yet here you are an hour later trying to give me the 3rd degree.

Why don't you grow the guts to watch the video and then confront me legitimately in a scientific disagreement over what it shows and I agree with? Are you too afraid Vals dad led Val astray with BS?

AS I mentioned earlier, I went to visit friends. They are more important than your video, which you are vehemently decrying as the "Truth".

Transcript please so I can see if I want to use my time to watch the rest of the show.

Geno

It's from a flat earther.....and neither scientific nor serious.

Would a transcript I could quickly scan for pertinent items point that out? Or would it lead me to the "Truth"?

Asking for a friend.

Geno

Yea, it would be very obvious rather quickly.

Thanks, no time for a video.

Gotta go catch an English Premier League soccer game now.

I know, I know, how unAmerican.

Maybe I'll watch a HOCKEY game instead, I think I've got one of those in the DVR.

The "truth" will have to wait.

Geno

If you passed biology you should know that it doesn't take the same mutation in both individuals to pass on a beneficial trait. I suspect that you were not paying attention in class.