24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 4 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
F
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
F
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
Originally Posted by Steve Redgwell
Wow, I've never owned a 280, but from what some here have suggested, you CAN put lipstick on a pig!

[Linked Image from miro.medium.com]


That said a lot right there, LOL!!!


What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
GB1

Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
F
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
F
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
Really, I have to say, for what I use it for the .270 does everything I need and then some. But guess what? I have both! My .280 is built on a 98 action with a 26" E.R. Shaw barrel and shoots a 150 grain anything out the barrel at just below 3000 FPS. That's scalding for a 150 grain. I owe this to the 26" barrel. It's a great rifle, but I don't need a 150 grain in my .270 to hunt deer, and that's what I do with it. My .270 has a lowly 22" Barrel on a 1966 Model 70. Yep it's just an old Push Feed post 63. But it's killed about 70 deer in the 53 years I've had it, so I'm keeping it. It's my favorite deer riflea

I like my .280 too. It was the first rifle I ever had built, and it works. I'm keeping it too. I take it hunting a lot. But my favorite for white tail deer is that ratty old push feed Model 70 .270.

Last edited by Filaman; 02/10/20.

What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,000
3
358wsm Offline OP
Campfire Tracker
OP Offline
Campfire Tracker
3
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 3,000


This has been quite an informative thread for me.
Thanks to all with experience and knowledge of the two calibers who have taken the time to mull it over with me.


"I'd rather have an Army of Asses led by a Lion, than an Army of Lions led by an Ass." (George Washington)
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,575
T
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
T
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,575
Under 400 yards purely emotional differences. So of course I want one smile


I do not entertain hypotheticals. The world itself is vexing enough. -- Col. Stonehill
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Originally Posted by keith


A. Correct thinking is that the 280 is as Magnum 270.

B . Those high BC 7mm bullets trump all 270 anything.



A. Sorry but hahaha, laughable.

B. NOT when you compare Proportional
bullets. eg. 130 - 270. vs. 140 - 284
140 - 270. vs. 150 - 284
etc.
See. Sectional Density


Jerry


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
IC B2

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
[quote=Steve Redgwell

Wow, I've never owned a 280, but from what some here have suggested, you CAN put lipstick on a pig!

[Linked Image from miro.medium.com]
———————-

10 - 4


Jerry


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
F
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
F
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
ruraldoc,

I suspect the accuracy edge you see in .280s is due to a small sample. I have owned a bunch of each and both cartridges have been extremely accurate in some--including a Model 78 Remington .270, the "cheap" birch-stocke 1d version they no longer offer.

As noted earlier, killed enough big game with the .280 during the 1990s (and the .270 from 1974 on) to know the theoretical killing-power advantages are just that. But rifle loonies often believe very firmly in small "paper" advantages.

If I feel the actual need for more than a .270 on big game, I tend to jump quite a bit beyond the .280, to a "medium bore."


Me too MD, and if I want to shoot 175-180 grain bullets I'll go to my ,30-06 or my .300 WBY or go to a 7 Mag. Yeah, I know, the .280 doesn't give up much to a 7 Mag, Well it does with 175 grain and heavier bullets. In the .270-.280 class, I don't need that heavy a bullet for hunting. And as far as all that BC, part of the gain is overridden by the heavier bullet's Velocity loss penalty especially at those longer ranges. I limit myself to 400-500 yards on game. On paper, no big deal, but I don't do a lot of paper punching. I'm a hunter.

Last edited by Filaman; 02/10/20.

What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,557
D
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
D
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 3,557
Originally Posted by Filaman
Originally Posted by Mule Deer
ruraldoc,

I suspect the accuracy edge you see in .280s is due to a small sample. I have owned a bunch of each and both cartridges have been extremely accurate in some--including a Model 78 Remington .270, the "cheap" birch-stocke 1d version they no longer offer.

As noted earlier, killed enough big game with the .280 during the 1990s (and the .270 from 1974 on) to know the theoretical killing-power advantages are just that. But rifle loonies often believe very firmly in small "paper" advantages.

If I feel the actual need for more than a .270 on big game, I tend to jump quite a bit beyond the .280, to a "medium bore."


Me too MD, and if I want to shoot 175-180 grain bullets I'll go to my ,30-06 or my .300 WBY or go to a 7 Mag. Yeah, I know, the .280 doesn't give up much to a 7 Mag, Well it does with 175 grain and heavier bullets. In the .270-.280 class, I don't need that heavy a bullet for hunting. And as far as all that BC, part of the gain is overridden by the heavier bullet's Velocity loss penalty especially at those longer ranges. I limit myself to 400-500 yards on game. On paper, no big deal, but I don't do a lot of paper punching. I'm a hunter.


I always got a kick out of the guys who would try to convince you of the superiority of the 280 over the 270, but then use the reverse argument when comparing it to the seven Mag. People are funny sometimes... 😁

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,155
Likes: 13
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,155
Likes: 13
I thought the purpose of the .280 was to make .270 owners feel insecure?


I am..........disturbed.

Concerning the difference between man and the jackass: some observers hold that there isn't any. But this wrongs the jackass. -Twain


Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
I thought the purpose of the .280 was to make .270 owners feel insecure?


FAIL

Jerry


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
IC B3

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
The 280 was Remington’s attempt to kinda sorta equal the 270.

Another Remington snafu.

Jerry


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,293
Likes: 1
M
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
M
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 10,293
Likes: 1
With a 280 you can shoot your 7mag bullets accurately and safely......


Last edited by muffin; 02/10/20.

"...A man's rights rest in three boxes: the ballot box, the jury box and the cartridge box..." Frederick Douglass, 1867

( . Y . )
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,488
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,488
Originally Posted by jwall
The 280 was Remington’s attempt to kinda sorta equal the 270.

Another Remington snafu.

Jerry



That being the case, you gotta wonder how things would be now if Remington's genius marketing team hadn't screwed everything up from the get go. It can't be argued, but it can be imagined. I don't even care to put forth a guess...it's pointless.

I did have a thought, though: in a world where a .243 or 6mm of another flavor would be adequate for a great deal of deer hunting, what advantage does either .270, .280, or .30-06 really offer?


Don't be the darkness.

America will perish while those who should be standing guard are satisfying their lusts.


Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
Guys, I don’t have ANYthing against the 280. I know what it is and
I know what it isn’t.

I have said sincerely, “ if you have a 270, you have a 280 AND
if you have a 280, you have a 270 “

Jerry


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,488
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,488
For all practical purposes, I fully agree, Jerry. I think some are arguing for fun...others are emotionally attached to a headstamp...not that there's anything wrong with that, either. grin


Don't be the darkness.

America will perish while those who should be standing guard are satisfying their lusts.


Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16,971
Likes: 1
S
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
S
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 16,971
Likes: 1

The hitch with the 270 is to get the BC’s of the 180 you have to run 140’s... but that slows her down..

Now that right there is some picky ... well pick’ em... I’ve shot a lot of critters at 500+ yards with a old school 30-06. smile

Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,214
Campfire 'Bwana
Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,214
How about this:

If you load your own ammo, the 280 has the advantage of a larger selection of VLD, high BC, component bullets.

If you primarily shoot factory loaded ammo, the 270 has the advantage of many more options in terms of manufacturers, bullet styles, bullet weights, and retail distribution.

Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,930
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 13,930
Originally Posted by jwall
The 280 was Remington’s attempt to kinda sorta equal the 270.

Another Remington snafu.

Jerry


Rumor has it the Remington model 740 couldn't handle the 270 pressures thus the 280. Lower pressure and all to make it semi friendly.

Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,155
Likes: 13
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,155
Likes: 13
Originally Posted by RiverRider
For all practical purposes, I fully agree, Jerry. I think some are arguing for fun...others are emotionally attached to a headstamp...not that there's anything wrong with that, either. grin



Arguing for fun? Is that legal around here?

I don't think either one is suitable for home defense.


I am..........disturbed.

Concerning the difference between man and the jackass: some observers hold that there isn't any. But this wrongs the jackass. -Twain


Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,488
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14,488
Originally Posted by DigitalDan
Originally Posted by RiverRider
For all practical purposes, I fully agree, Jerry. I think some are arguing for fun...others are emotionally attached to a headstamp...not that there's anything wrong with that, either. grin



Arguing for fun? Is that legal around here?

I don't think either one is suitable for home defense.



Oh, come on, Dan! Everyone knows .270 will bounce off a bad guy, but .280 will kill em deader 'n a doornail!


Don't be the darkness.

America will perish while those who should be standing guard are satisfying their lusts.


Page 4 of 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 9 10

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

536 members (12344mag, 10gaugemag, 17CalFan, 1936M71, 16penny, 55 invisible), 2,266 guests, and 1,309 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,391
Posts18,488,731
Members73,970
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.199s Queries: 54 (0.009s) Memory: 0.9144 MB (Peak: 1.0147 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-04 14:39:53 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS