|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,771
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,771 |
I tried to find the answer but it’s all in Engineer speak which I don’t understand. Simply stated, which Is less likely to bend along its length .120 wall 2x2 or .120 wall 1x3 (using the 3” side)
Which will resist twisting the best?
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,276 Likes: 37
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 56,276 Likes: 37 |
Define 'bend'.
If the 1x3 is carrying the load with the 3" side bearing the stress it will resist better than the 2x2, otherwise the 2x2 wins. Not unlike how an I-beam works
I am..........disturbed.
Concerning the difference between man and the jackass: some observers hold that there isn't any. But this wrongs the jackass. -Twain
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,796
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,796 |
the square tube. By a lot.
Sean
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 152,713 Likes: 54
Campfire Savant
|
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 152,713 Likes: 54 |
Define 'bend'.
If the 1x3 is carrying the load with the 3" side bearing the stress it will resist better than the 2x2, otherwise the 2x2 wins. Not unlike how an I-beam works
The square tube
Last edited by hanco; 02/11/20.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 10,112 Likes: 15
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 10,112 Likes: 15 |
1X3 will twist like a coil spring but it will carry more downforce with the wide side vertical. What are you building? We used a lot of 2X5 tubing for building round track race car frames, with appropriate cross bracing and roll cages. It's strong, and fairly lightweight. Jerry
Ignorance can be fixed. Stupid is forever!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,796
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1,796 |
I don’t have tables for tube that small so I compared 4x4x1/4 and 6x2x1/4, which are both double the size you are looking at. The 4x4 is 4 times as stiff in bending as the 6x2 bent the weak way, about the same as the 6x2 bent the strong way. And twice as torsionally stiff.
So the same result hold true for the shapes you are looking at, at roughy the same ratios.
Sean
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,771
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,771 |
Basically a swing out hitch haul. Didn’t want to overbuild it to the point that it weighs 100lbs but I also don’t want to put something heavy on it and twist it all to hell if I hit a big bump.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 26,152 Likes: 22
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 26,152 Likes: 22 |
Check out the Aluminum hitch hauls at Harbour Freight. It might be less than the cost of materials to build your own.
People who choose to brew up their own storms bitch loudest about the rain.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,458
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 6,458 |
1X3 will support more than a 2x2 with same thickness and material.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,771
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,771 |
The more research I do, the further down the rabbit hole I go. Here’s what I think I understand... In laymen’s terms, I can treat each tube as a “ I -beam” in that the top and bottom of the tube is treated like the flange on a beam. The wider the flange, the more torsional stability the tube has. The taller the web (side wall of the tube) the stronger the resistance to deflection longitudinally. So the 2x2 better for torsional forces (twisting) and the 1x3 is better for less longitudinal deflection (sag).
Now an engineer will chime in and tell me everything I think I understand...is wrong
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 10,112 Likes: 15
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 10,112 Likes: 15 |
Engineers built the "unsinkable" Titanic. Jerry
Ignorance can be fixed. Stupid is forever!
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 891
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 891 |
Using simple beam theory (stress = My/I), for a given simple bending scenario and same applied loads/boundary conditions, I'm seeing the 1x3 tubing developing about 90% of the stress as the 2x2. So yes the 1x3 is stiffer (in bending) for Hookean materials assuming elastic conditions are maintained.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,984 Likes: 10
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,984 Likes: 10 |
Engineers built the "unsinkable" Titanic. Jerry
Amateurs built the arc!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 10,112 Likes: 15
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2019
Posts: 10,112 Likes: 15 |
Engineers built the "unsinkable" Titanic. Jerry
Amateurs built the arc! Yeah, but they had a better engineer supervising the construction! Jerry
Ignorance can be fixed. Stupid is forever!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,265 Likes: 1
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,265 Likes: 1 |
Using simple beam theory (stress = My/I), for a given simple bending scenario and same applied loads/boundary conditions, I'm seeing the 1x3 tubing developing about 90% of the stress as the 2x2. So yes the 1x3 is stiffer (in bending) for Hookean materials assuming elastic conditions are maintained. I see what you did there...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,984 Likes: 10
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,984 Likes: 10 |
Engineers built the "unsinkable" Titanic. Jerry
Amateurs built the arc! Yeah, but they had a better engineer supervising the construction! Jerry Agreed
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 834
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 834 |
Hands down round tube is stronger.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,189 Likes: 13
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 9,189 Likes: 13 |
There is a reason modern high stress crane booms are built with round tubing.
Well this is a fine pickle we're in, should'a listened to Joe McCarthy and George Orwell I guess.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,780 Likes: 8
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 16,780 Likes: 8 |
Basically a swing out hitch haul. Didn’t want to overbuild it to the point that it weighs 100lbs but I also don’t want to put something heavy on it and twist it all to hell if I hit a big bump. Delete. Unnecessary post.
Last edited by Rooster7; 02/12/20.
The deer hunter does not notice the mountains
"I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve" - Isoroku Yamamoto
There sure are a lot of America haters that want to live here...
|
|
|
|
109 members (10gaugemag, 7mm_Loco, 24HourCampFireGuy50, 300_savage, 1_deuce, 18 invisible),
14,945
guests, and
1,150
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,195,228
Posts18,543,978
Members74,060
|
Most Online21,066 May 26th, 2024
|
|
|
|