24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 59,303
Likes: 49
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 59,303
Likes: 49
Originally Posted by auk1124
I can't make any sense out of the reloading data for H322 and 52-53 grain bullets in 223. Hodgdon gives a max charge of 23 something, Speer a max charge of 24 something, and I think Sierra maxes at 25 something. Sierra's starting charge is darn near Hodgdon's max, unless I am reading the data wrong.

Don't know how one bullet weight and powder can have a two grain spread in the reloading data for max charges. I have a box of Hornady 53 grain match bullets that I would like to try with H322, but I can't figure out where to start.


H322 is a position sensitive powder so you have to be careful when decreasing charges, that said any of those starting charges will be safe, start with you lowest one first and work up from there.

It is important to be prudent when reloading, always measure by hand when working up loads and keep measuring by hand when using max loads.

Good luck and have fun.


Paul

"I'd rather see a sermon than hear a sermon".... D.A.D.

Trump Won!, Sandmann Won!, Rittenhouse Won!, Suck it Liberal Fuuktards.

molɔ̀ːn labé skýla

GB1

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,361
Likes: 10
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,361
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by auk1124
I can't make any sense out of the reloading data for H322 and 52-53 grain bullets in 223. Hodgdon gives a max charge of 23 something, Speer a max charge of 24 something, and I think Sierra maxes at 25 something. Sierra's starting charge is darn near Hodgdon's max, unless I am reading the data wrong.

Don't know how one bullet weight and powder can have a two grain spread in the reloading data for max charges. I have a box of Hornady 53 grain match bullets that I would like to try with H322, but I can't figure out where to start.

I tossed out all of my Sierra loading manuals after I found out that they do not have pressure testing equipment. They test the same way you and I do, they guess by reading the fired cases.


Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,361
Likes: 10
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,361
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by auk1124
I can't make any sense out of the reloading data for H322 and 52-53 grain bullets in 223. Hodgdon gives a max charge of 23 something, Speer a max charge of 24 something, and I think Sierra maxes at 25 something. Sierra's starting charge is darn near Hodgdon's max, unless I am reading the data wrong.

Don't know how one bullet weight and powder can have a two grain spread in the reloading data for max charges. I have a box of Hornady 53 grain match bullets that I would like to try with H322, but I can't figure out where to start.

I tossed out all of my Sierra loading manuals after I found out that they do not have pressure testing equipment. They test the same way you and I do, they guess by reading the fired cases.
Originally Posted by Armednfree
Originally Posted by antelope_sniper
Originally Posted by Armednfree
Here's an issue. Most of what I see and what people say is based on the AR-15. The thing is AR-15's have one of three chambers typically. A NATO chamber, a Wylde or a Compass Lake. mine is an actual Sammi spec 223 chamber, and seemingly rather tight at that. My lead is one hell of a lot shorter than those.

I tried to chamber an empty that was fired in the Windham AR, not even close.


Yes.

A true .223 chamber and 26" barrel is a good bit different:

Code
Cartridge          : .223 Rem. (SAAMI)
Bullet             : .224, 68, Hornady BTHP M 2278
Useable Case Capaci: 24.415 grain H2O = 1.585 cm³
Cartridge O.A.L. L6: 2.260 inch = 57.40 mm
Barrel Length      : 26.0 inch = 660.4 mm
Powder             : Hodgdon H322

Predicted data by increasing and decreasing the given charge,
incremented in steps of 2.273% of nominal charge.
CAUTION: Figures exceed maximum and minimum recommended loads !

Step    Fill. Charge   Vel.  Energy   Pmax   Pmuz  Prop.Burnt B_Time
 %       %    Grains   fps   ft.lbs    psi    psi      %        ms

-22.7   78    17.00   2411     878   27213   4794     93.1    1.505
-20.5   80    17.50   2476     925   29252   4948     94.3    1.462
-18.2   82    18.00   2539     974   31442   5095     95.3    1.421
-15.9   85    18.50   2603    1023   33796   5232     96.3    1.381
-13.6   87    19.00   2666    1073   36328   5361     97.2    1.343
-11.4   89    19.50   2729    1124   39051   5479     97.9    1.302
-09.1   92    20.00   2791    1176   41983   5587     98.6    1.262
-06.8   94    20.50   2853    1229   45143   5684     99.1    1.223
-04.5   96    21.00   2914    1282   48550   5769     99.5    1.186  ! Near Maximum !
-02.3   98    21.50   2974    1335   52228   5842     99.8    1.151  ! Near Maximum !
+00.0  101    22.00   3034    1390   56204   5902     99.9    1.117  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+02.3  103    22.50   3093    1444   60485   5950    100.0    1.084  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+04.5  105    23.00   3151    1499   65085   5989    100.0    1.053  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+06.8  108    23.50   3209    1554   70058   6026    100.0    1.023  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+09.1  110    24.00   3266    1610   75443   6060    100.0    0.995  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
+11.4  112    24.50   3322    1666   81283   6092    100.0    0.967  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!

Results caused by ± 3% powder lot-to-lot burning rate variation using nominal charge
Data for burning rate increased by 3% relative to nominal value:
+Ba    101    22.00   3070    1423   59459   5817    100.0    1.094  !DANGEROUS LOAD-DO NOT USE!
Data for burning rate decreased by 3% relative to nominal value:
-Ba    101    22.00   2993    1353   52971   5964     99.5    1.142  ! Near Maximum !



I'm trying to figure out why it calls 22 grains dangerous when I shoot 22.7 grains with no issue.


Take a fired case and weight it, fill it with H2O and weigh it again.
Subtract, this is the case capacity in grains of H2O that Quickload needs to be more accurate.


Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,361
Likes: 10
S
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,361
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by Armednfree
Here's an issue. Most of what I see and what people say is based on the AR-15. The thing is AR-15's have one of three chambers typically. A NATO chamber, a Wylde or a Compass Lake. mine is an actual Sammi spec 223 chamber, and seemingly rather tight at that. My lead is one hell of a lot shorter than those.

I tried to chamber an empty that was fired in the Windham AR, not even close.


This could indeed be caused by chamber dimensions, but it can also be caused by the the cycling of the Semi-Auto action.

In a semi-Auto the bolt can unlock and eject the case before it has a chance to fully retract from it's expanded dimensions.

The net result is that some amount of additional expansion frequently occurs in a case fired through a semi-auto.

I have noticed this in my Colt 5.56 AR and my Ruger Mini-30. The fired case will not easily chamber in either. By AR-15 Grendel and Blackout, do not suffer from this.

Take a case fired from your AR and see if it chambers and Extracts with ease. Be careful though, if you let the AR action slam shut you may have one hell of a time getting that case back out.

This is about the M14, but the same principles can apply to other semi-autos.

http://www.zediker.com/downloads/14_loading.pdf


Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 152,601
Likes: 52
Campfire Savant
Online Content
Campfire Savant
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 152,601
Likes: 52
I like CFE 223. It meters well!

IC B2

Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,222
Likes: 10
A
Campfire 'Bwana
Offline
Campfire 'Bwana
A
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 31,222
Likes: 10
Originally Posted by auk1124
I can't make any sense out of the reloading data for H322 and 52-53 grain bullets in 223. Hodgdon gives a max charge of 23 something, Speer a max charge of 24 something, and I think Sierra maxes at 25 something. Sierra's starting charge is darn near Hodgdon's max, unless I am reading the data wrong.

Don't know how one bullet weight and powder can have a two grain spread in the reloading data for max charges. I have a box of Hornady 53 grain match bullets that I would like to try with H322, but I can't figure out where to start.


Auk,

Bearing surface can make a significant difference, which can be affected by Boat tails and ogive lengths.

And, as previously mentioned, need to watch what pressure standard they are using, .223 vs. 5.56.

Case volume also matters. When I adjust for case volume, it's not unusual for QL predictions to be withing 20 fps of actual chronograph results, or withing the margin of error for typical standard deviations.


You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.

You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Page 2 of 2 1 2

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24



433 members (17CalFan, 06hunter59, 19rabbit52, 160user, 163bc, 1lesfox, 40 invisible), 2,755 guests, and 1,128 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,194,655
Posts18,533,871
Members74,041
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.117s Queries: 26 (0.013s) Memory: 0.8368 MB (Peak: 0.8865 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-24 12:20:29 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS