|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 28,172
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 28,172 |
Does you mother know you have a "dirty mouth"?!?
Hunt with Class and Classics
Religion: A founder of The Church of Spray and Pray
Acquit v. t. To render a judgment in a murder case in San Francisco... EQUAL, adj. As bad as something else. Ambrose Bierce “The Devil's Dictionary”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 28,172
Campfire Ranger
|
OP
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 28,172 |
If a governor is violating an incorporated constitutional right, doesn't the Federal government have the authority and obligation to step in? That's what federal courts are for. It's the way things work. It's a process that gets too bogged down anymore, but it's the Constitutional way to do things. And if they defy the courts? About all that I see that can be done is withhold federal funds, but there's always a commie fed judge to issue an injunction. We're becoming nearly effectively dysfunctional, because of the federal judiciary.
Hunt with Class and Classics
Religion: A founder of The Church of Spray and Pray
Acquit v. t. To render a judgment in a murder case in San Francisco... EQUAL, adj. As bad as something else. Ambrose Bierce “The Devil's Dictionary”
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 69,332 Likes: 19
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 69,332 Likes: 19 |
If a governor is violating an incorporated constitutional right, doesn't the Federal government have the authority and obligation to step in? That's what federal courts are for. It's the way things work. It's a process that gets too bogged down anymore, but it's the Constitutional way to do things. And if they defy the courts? About all that I see that can be done is withhold federal funds, but there's always a commie fed judge to issue an injunction. We're becoming nearly effectively dysfunctional, because of the federal judiciary. Yep. All the Commie Socialist Judges the Halfican appointed have been screwing Trump’s progress every step of the way since he’s been POTUS. Time for a big ole public necktie party. 😡
"Allways speak the truth and you will never have to remember what you said before..." Sam Houston Texans, "We say Grace, We Say Mam, If You Don't Like it, We Don't Give a Damn!"
~Molɔ̀ːn Labé Skýla~
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,346 Likes: 2
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 18,346 Likes: 2 |
Was Barr out of line in telling City of Greenville that they were out of line fining attendees of a drive-in Easter service? https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/atto...ligious-practice-and-social-distancing-0
Attorney General William P. Barr issued the following statement:
"In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, the President has issued guidelines calling on all Americans to do their part to slow the spread of a dangerous and highly contagious virus. Those measures are important because the virus is transmitted so easily from person to person, and because it all too often has life-threatening consequences for its victims, it has the potential to overwhelm health care systems when it surges.
To contain the virus and protect the most vulnerable among us, Americans have been asked, for a limited period of time, to practice rigorous social distancing. The President has also asked Americans to listen to and follow directions issued by state and local authorities regarding social distancing. Social distancing, while difficult and unfamiliar for a nation that has long prided itself on the strength of its voluntary associations, has the potential to save hundreds of thousands of American lives from an imminent threat. Scrupulously observing these guidelines is the best path to swiftly ending COVID-19’s profound disruptions to our national life and resuming the normal economic life of our country. Citizens who seek to do otherwise are not merely assuming risk with respect to themselves, but are exposing others to danger. In exigent circumstances, when the community as a whole faces an impending harm of this magnitude, and where the measures are tailored to meeting the imminent danger, the constitution does allow some temporary restriction on our liberties that would not be tolerated in normal circumstances.
But even in times of emergency, when reasonable and temporary restrictions are placed on rights, the First Amendment and federal statutory law prohibit discrimination against religious institutions and religious believers. Thus, government may not impose special restrictions on religious activity that do not also apply to similar nonreligious activity. For example, if a government allows movie theaters, restaurants, concert halls, and other comparable places of assembly to remain open and unrestricted, it may not order houses of worship to close, limit their congregation size, or otherwise impede religious gatherings. Religious institutions must not be singled out for special burdens.
Today, the Department filed a Statement of Interest in support of a church in Mississippi that allegedly sought to hold parking lot worship services, in which congregants listened to their pastor preach over their car radios, while sitting in their cars in the church parking lot with their windows rolled up. The City of Greenville fined congregants $500 per person for attending these parking lot services – while permitting citizens to attend nearby drive-in restaurants, even with their windows open.[1] The City appears to have thereby singled churches out as the only essential service (as designated by the state of Mississippi) that may not operate despite following all CDC and state recommendations regarding social distancing.
As we explain in the Statement of Interest, where a state has not acted evenhandedly, it must have a compelling reason to impose restrictions on places of worship and must ensure that those restrictions are narrowly tailored to advance its compelling interest. While we believe that during this period there is a sufficient basis for the social distancing rules that have been put in place, the scope and justification of restrictions beyond that will have to be assessed based on the circumstances as they evolve.
Religion and religious worship continue to be central to the lives of millions of Americans. This is true more so than ever during this difficult time. The pandemic has changed the ways Americans live their lives. Religious communities have rallied to the critical need to protect the community from the spread of this disease by making services available online and in ways that otherwise comply with social distancing guidelines.
The United States Department of Justice will continue to ensure that religious freedom remains protected if any state or local government, in their response to COVID-19, singles out, targets, or discriminates against any house of worship for special restrictions."
Last edited by Steve; 04/14/20.
Carpe' Scrotum
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40,179
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 40,179 |
In exigent circumstances, when the community as a whole faces an impending harm of this magnitude, and where the measures are tailored to meeting the imminent danger, the constitution does allow some temporary restriction on our liberties that would not be tolerated in normal circumstances. Probably why he was able to ban bump stocks without any retribution whatsoever.
Son of a liberal: " What did you do in the War On Terror, Daddy?"
Liberal father: " I fought the Americans, along with all the other liberals."
MOLON LABE
|
|
|
|
503 members (2500HD, 270wsmnutt, 260Remguy, 1234, 1minute, 10gaugeman, 56 invisible),
2,788
guests, and
1,251
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,193,130
Posts18,502,601
Members73,989
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|