|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,502
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,502 |
Those bullets must be jammed into the rifling.. hornady recommends For the 145 ELD-X oal of 3.210 you are at 3.350..
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego. Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14
New Member
|
OP
New Member
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14 |
No, hornady book says 3.330 COL for 145 ELDX in 270. It says 3.210 for 140 sst and 140 interlock. The bullet shape and length is very different from the sst therefore a mush long COL. I have measured my gun and my max COAL is 3.405 measured to the lands with the eldx, minus 20 thousands and I am at 3.385 so I am actually 50 thou off the lands. I would post a picture of the load data from hornady book but as I am sitting here looking at the data I see no reason.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 5
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 5 |
It seems from your results that for whatever reason, your rifle and/or loads generate more pressure than usual. A cardinal rule of handloading is to stop when you reach EITHER the top charge level, or the top velocity. You were over that line with your first load using H4831 and should have backed off then. The loose primer pockets are solid proof, just like the hard bolt lift and ejector mark from your latest batch.
You may have a tight chamber or neck, a tight barrel (less likely), your brass may be too long, (you did measure your cases before loading, right?), or the neck diameter of your loaded rounds may be too large for your chamber, either of which prevents the bullets from exiting the case properly. Bottom line is you need to check the dimensions of your loads again and if okay, then most likely you have a tight chamber and need to work up from the bottom and stop when you reach YOUR top as described above, or when pressure signs appear. Loose primer pockets and ejector marks are signs you've gone way over the line and are headed for trouble unless you back off.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,001
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,001 |
And that's where I stopped testing since primers were a bit flat and noticed harder bolt lift and on final round noticed a ejector mark on case.
Flattened primers don't mean much. The ejector mark and hard bolt lift do. You data is consistent with mine in that RL26 seems to give a fairly large plateau in velocity. How many rounds did you fire to get your velocity data? 3000fps is all you need so I wouldn't be afraid to use your starting load and go forth and kill stuff as long as you aren't seeing any other signs of excess pressure or hard bolt lift at that charge. Have you tried to seat primers in any of the second batch yet?
I am continually astounded at how quickly people make up their minds on little evidence or none at all. Jack O'Connor
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14
New Member
|
OP
New Member
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14 |
Updated load data with lowered starting load.
55.8 2905 56.0 2895 56.2 2931 56.4 2928 56.6 2947 56.8 2965 57.0 2943 57.2 2967 57.4 2987 57.6 3010 57.8 3016
I am looking at loading a few more rounds focusing on the node between 56.6 to 57.2. I am still noticing a bit of flattening of the primers but no other pressure signs with all the test shots today. I hope to find the load with lowest sd around 2950-60 and still have an accurate load with the limited headspace I have to play with using these extremely long bullets. If not then I will be giving up on the eldx for this rifle. I have changed all that I can other than primers so if I'm not happy with what I see I'm not sure what else to do to make this bullet work out if this rifle. Does anyone have any insight into a load they had and changed the primers with and saw an increase or decrease of pressure or velocity?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,502
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,502 |
No, hornady book says 3.330 COL for 145 ELDX in 270. It says 3.210 for 140 sst and 140 interlock. The bullet shape and length is very different from the sst therefore a mush long COL. I have measured my gun and my max COAL is 3.405 measured to the lands with the eldx, minus 20 thousands and I am at 3.385 so I am actually 50 thou off the lands. I would post a picture of the load data from hornady book but as I am sitting here looking at the data I see no reason. You sure? This is from the 10th edition hornady manual
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego. Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14
New Member
|
OP
New Member
Joined: May 2020
Posts: 14 |
I can't attach a picture because this [bleep] website won't allow my pics to upload because the file size is too big. But I assure you as I am ready straight out of my Hornady reloading manual, 270 win, 145 Eldx, item no 27356, COL 3.330, G1 BC 0.536, G7 BC 0.270.
I really don't know why my 10th edition manual is different than yours but clearly it is. I'm going to email Hornady and ask them why there is a discrepancy and which data is correct. This eldx load is becoming a real pain in the ass and I may just sell the bullets I have on hand and go to the 150 set since the bc is almost the same and I know my gun shots the 130s so the 150s should work as well.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 7,263 |
I would try them at 3.20" COL just to see but I am thinking that bullet may be a poor match for your rifle.
Last edited by Tejano; 06/07/20.
"When you disarm the people, you commence to offend them and show that you distrust them either through cowardice or lack of confidence, and both of these opinions generate hatred." Niccolo Machiavelli
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 5
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 28,819 Likes: 5 |
My PDF version is the same as 79S'.
Matters not. What matters is your loads have "issues". Seat them deeper, say 3.210, and work up again. Stop when your velocity reaches the top, or your charges do, or at the first sign of high pressure. Primers are unreliable as a pressure sign.
What fresh Hell is this?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,502
Campfire Ranger
|
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,502 |
I can't attach a picture because this [bleep] website won't allow my pics to upload because the file size is too big. But I assure you as I am ready straight out of my Hornady reloading manual, 270 win, 145 Eldx, item no 27356, COL 3.330, G1 BC 0.536, G7 BC 0.270.
I really don't know why my 10th edition manual is different than yours but clearly it is. I'm going to email Hornady and ask them why there is a discrepancy and which data is correct. This eldx load is becoming a real pain in the ass and I may just sell the bullets I have on hand and go to the 150 set since the bc is almost the same and I know my gun shots the 130s so the 150s should work as well. Regardless sounds like you have a bunch of free-bore, so you shouldn't be seeing pressures like you are currently seeing. When you resize your fired cases out of that rifle, do they chamber with no issue in your rifle?
Then STFU. The rest of your statement is superflous bullshit with no real bearing on this discussion other than to massage your own ego. Suckin' on my titties like you wanted me.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 30,993 |
I can't attach a picture because this [bleep] website won't allow my pics to upload because the file size is too big. But I assure you as I am ready straight out of my Hornady reloading manual, 270 win, 145 Eldx, item no 27356, COL 3.330, G1 BC 0.536, G7 BC 0.270.
I really don't know why my 10th edition manual is different than yours but clearly it is. I'm going to email Hornady and ask them why there is a discrepancy and which data is correct. This eldx load is becoming a real pain in the ass and I may just sell the bullets I have on hand and go to the 150 set since the bc is almost the same and I know my gun shots the 130s so the 150s should work as well. Rifles are like women. They are going to like what they like, and not what you think they should like, nor what you want them to like. There's no accounting for their taste. You can choose to live with their tastes, or send them down the road.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,259
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Apr 2017
Posts: 3,259 |
Rifles are like women. They are going to like what they like, and not what you think they should like, nor what you want them to like. There's no accounting for their taste. You can choose to live with their tastes, or send them down the road. SPOT ON BROTHER
"If there are no dogs in Heaven, then when I die, I want to go where they went" Will Rogers
|
|
|
|
550 members (22250rem, 10Glocks, 01Foreman400, 1lessdog, 17CalFan, 10gaugemag, 61 invisible),
2,470
guests, and
1,148
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,192,403
Posts18,488,921
Members73,970
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|