I have looked these over numerous times. I now believe I will replace my time honored RockChucker with one. I am curious how others deal with the slop in the die groove when making the transition?
By the way, in case you missed it, Jeremiah was a bullfrog.
I have looked these over numerous times. I now believe I will replace my time honored RockChucker with one. I am curious how others deal with the slop in the die groove when making the transition?
I was skeptical myself about 'floating dies'...until I employed the dial test indicator. Unfortunately, in my quest for very low runout...I discovered many of my dies were the problem. Nothing that a wad of money and several sets of Forster/Bonanza dies couldn't fix. One word of caution if you are going for minimum runout...the Forster Die Lockrings are worth every penny. The old radial setscrew lockrings will make a concentric set of dies produce bad runout.
Well this is a fine pickle we're in, should'a listened to Joe McCarthy and George Orwell I guess.
I keep a pile of Forster lock rings on hand. I tend to buy Redding dies. Whenever I get a new die, the first thing I do is switch out the Redding lock ring for a Forster lock ring.
I have looked these over numerous times. I now believe I will replace my time honored RockChucker with one. I am curious how others deal with the slop in the die groove when making the transition?
I have used one for decades and would not switch. The only issue I have with it is the tall Vickerman seating dies I use and I do them on a Rockchucker.
Mark Begich, Joaquin Jackson, and Heller resistance... Three huge reasons to worry about the NRA.
Had 8 single stage and turret presses for many years (including a Foster) and a few years ago sold them all off and bought a Redding T-7...could not be happier.
Foster was a great press but didn't make ammo any more accurate than a 50 year old Lyman All-American...
That said, you can't go wrong with one. The major thing I didn't like about it was not being able to use the RCBS Precision Seating Dies because they take a special long shell holder.
Bob
If you can not deal with reality, reality will deal with you....
I have had one for years. Wouldn’t go back. I too keep a stack of the lock rings on hand and when I order dies (almost always Forster or Redding) they get swapped out immediately. GreggH
I actually use the Hornady LNL rings on most of my dies. I've never measured much other than concentricity of my loaded ammo and the Forster makes good stuff.
... I am curious how others deal with the slop in the die groove when making the transition?
The late Dwight Furrow of Thorndike, ME, was a 5 time national benchrest champion for score, (and 4 consecutive years (1993,94,95,96) champion out to 300 yards, in 3 classes. He was my mentor for accurate reloading techniques. He used a Forster co-ax press for his match reloads. He told me the die freedom in the press (or "slop" as you call it) is a great benefit for accurate reloads. The freedom allows the case and die to center naturally with minimal stress (run out), allowing for concentric necks , resizing, and bullet seating-all for best accuracy. He used to use an RCBS press, but got better results with the Forster co-ax press.
He swore by his Forster co-ax press. It was the only press he owned.
Dwight's name was a constant fixture in the match results section of Precision Shooting magazine. He loved the Rem 788 action, and Hart barrels.
I chose the RCBS Summit but the Co-Ax wasn't available at the time , love the Summit though . Good comparison here iff'n you haven't already seen it . Gavin was shooting buddies with our sorely missed Jim the Plumber , RIP , .
Last edited by ol_mike; 08/07/20.
PRESIDENT TRUMP 2024/2028 !!!!!!!!!!
Posted by Bristoe The people wringing their hands over Trump's rhetoric don't know what time it is in America.
Forster makes good, durable products. I have found similar results re: concentricity by using Lee lock rings on my sizing/seat dies. They have a large o-ring that can be lightly tightened thus allowing the die to float.
I am..........disturbed.
Concerning the difference between man and the jackass: some observers hold that there isn't any. But this wrongs the jackass. -Twain
Don’t throw away your rock checker, you’ll still need it if you end up pulling any bullets.
?
I pull bullets on mine.
I tried with my Coax but flipping the lever while trying to grab a bullet you are raising with the arm that crosses that same lever just didn’t work well. It works from some bullets, but for many hard to grab rounds it was a nightmare
On my bench ... Dillon XL650, then the 21st Century Hydrolic Arbor press, Next to a Forster Co-aX, Next to my RCBS Rock crusher.
I have a rockchucker Supreme and Lee classic case that are both converted for Hornady lock and load bushings. I've tried other more expensive reddings but I just like the rock chucker Supreme. My Hornady progressive got me hooked on the bushings.
I almost bought a coax about 10 years ago but some local match shooters talked me out of it.
I have had my Co-ax since the mid 70’s. It has been my only press since then, and has loaded a lot of ammo over the years. A few years ago I upgraded it to an A-2 priming station but seldom use it for priming. It’s still working fine so I think it was worth it. If you a high volume pistol shooter there are better presses for sure, and a turret press is nice for holding a lot of dies. The die change and universal shell holder on the Co-ax helps move things along pretty quickly. It can be quirky for some people, but when you use it for a while those quirks will disappear. It’s a good solid press and will last a lifetime.