Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire People in Kenosha got their guns out

Every Single Time.

The second and third shoots were clearly justifiable. How was the child molester still an immediate threat of death or serious bodily injury after he threw the incendiary device?

The entire incident began when a child molester assaulted another child.

That should be the defense attorney's opening statement.

Yeah. No harm no foul, right?

He was still in active pursuit within the context of an ongoing mob riot. Rittenhouse had been targeted by the mob for violence. Rosenbaum was merely the member of said mob who was closest to him in the chase at that moment, already having demonstrated an intent imminently to cause him serious bodily injury.

In some States, including shîthole Oregon you can use lethal force against an arsonist, if said arsonist is about to set light to a structure where a person would be thought inside.

Throwing a fire bomb at a person...Same thing.

Your questions lately seem to come from a lens that once the initial, unsuccessful, act is done, you assume there wouldn’t be anymore violence from a person towards his/her targeted victim...Akin to being shot at until bad guy runs out of ammo...Why shoot him? He was out of bullets.

😎

Measure the kid's actions against this element of WI law:

"The actor may not intentionally use force which is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm unless the actor reasonably believes that such force is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself."

The kid and his lawyer will have to address the threat that this specific person presented at the time he was shot. To the best of my knowledge WI law doesn't allow retaliation.

The child molester was killed when he was trying to take the rifle from the child.

We don't know because we weren't there.

That.

Or had a knife.

Or picked up a rock.

Or said something like "I'm gonna kill you."

There's a million variables and based on what the kid demonstrated in the other footage, I'm sure the dots will directly connect to a full acquittal.

I’ll prolly go to hell for this. The loss of human life should probably almost always be a somber event.




But a sparked off white guy yelling at another white guy yelling “ shoot me n**ga” doesn’t get the response he wants.


So in a moment of brilliance he decides he’ll chase this armed mofo down the street throwing chit at him yelling the same 🤦🏼‍♂️



Careful what you wish for lads

Seriously

A guy is chasing you, probably yelling I'll kill you ( or shoot me nig ga). Then the guy throws either a brick or MTC at you, you are running away from him in fear of your life, most likely. You stop and turn to stand your ground and guy is still running at you.

You don't think shorty is a threat to kid? How does kid know shorty doesn't have a knife or handgun? Do you just stand there and wait for shorty to escalate and poke a hole in you before you can defend yourself?

You apparently haven't been in a fight other than with your cat, or you would realize things can go south fast. A guy chasing you is always a threat until he stops chasing you, and walks away. Let your guard down,and you might not see tomorrow.

I see lots of stupid folks on twitter posts, what handle do you go by?

The funniest I just read from the above posting link: It's all Trumps fault that he allowed the Corona to get here from China and the UK! Fug gin brain dead folks who hopefully can't figure out how to vote.

Pussified ROE leads to these "protesting" turds being emboldened.

It should be more like this: You come at me with a great bodily harm or deadly level threat then it's on until I say otherwise. If you survive the encounter then be appreciative of my mercy.

Cool. "OK".

Lol.

I ask, because it is going to be a key legal question.

The child molester attacked the child with a brick in a bag. Something he learned in prison although in prison it's a lock in a sock.

It's a deadly weapon. The child molester was also attempting to take the rifle from the minor when he was shot.

The entire event was initiated when a child molester attempted to attack a child.

The kid's legal team with have to do much better than the above spew to establish specifically how the molester was an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury. Try again.

Tucker had a journalist on last night that WAS there. Within 6-8 ft away, WAY closer than the video that could exonerate the kid.

Is there video that clearly shows that? I haven't seen it if there is.

There's going to be a lot of "key legal questions."

Despite popular opinion in 2020, not everything has to be on video to become evidence.