It iscwritten: For our fight is not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, and against spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly places.
Scum like Suckermore and Gayghost and Ejp and Leroy and Jell0 are just low IQ stupid kool-aid drinking useful idiots.
Ecc 10:2 The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but that of a fool to the left.
A Nation which leaves God behind is soon left behind.
"The Lord never asked anyone to be a tax collector, lowyer, or Redskins fan".
They're all the same people today. They've all been co-opted.
Progressives are the most open minded, tolerant, and inclusive people on the planet, as long as you agree with everything they say, and do exactly as you're told.
Hey, that redhead holding the sign looks like my ex gf! All of those adjectives fit her. Crazy powder keg juggling torches too.
The "progressives" control the most impressionable years of just about every americans' life.....education, media, pop culture. They change vocabulary to suit their agenda. Not Marxists or communists....no, its progressives.....hope and change are the mantras. I don't know what the next will be.
Good article, well worth the time. He's correct that what we're dealing is essentially Marxism. But there is an important difference:
Quote
Conflict theory applied to industrial capitalist economics is Marxism proper. That didn’t work, and people noticed. The neo-Marxists understood that Marx was wrong to say that economics were the relevant object upstream of politics. They realized it is culture and thus the impacts culture has on individual psychologies that is upstream of politics. Critical Theory, then, arose as an application of conflict theory to ideology and culture, as analyzed partly through (psychoanalytic) psychology and the emerging field of sociology. They blamed Marxism for failing to understand people and society just as much as they blamed liberalism for producing a means by which people could see society as essentially fair and success as essentially the result of talent and effort.
So, neo-Marxism is Marxian but not Marxist, in that it continues the conflict theory-style analysis of Marx into a different realm and does so toward essentially Marxist ends. One could say this is a distinction without a difference, but that is incorrect. The consequence of this shift is profound. It means that rather than attempting to unite workers and seize the means of economic production, as the Marxists had envisioned, the neo-Marxists wanted to change culture itself. This led them to find multiple sites of the oppressor/oppressed dynamic in society and get inside peoples' heads with it, which they derived from the intentional forced marriage of Freudian psychoanalysis into Marxian social theory. They led them to understand the importance of seizing the means of cultural production—education, media, arts, journalism, faith, and entertainment.
If you are reading an article about Maxrism written by a Jew, you know you are getting first hand information. And true to form, it is liberally salted with deception from the first sentence on.
Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
If you are reading an article about Maxrism written by a Jew, you know you are getting first hand information. And true to form, it is liberally salted with deception from the first sentence on.
Please tell us more. Specifics.
and what does the Lord require of you but to do justice, and to love kindness, and to walk humbly with your God? (Micah 6:8)
That Quote is usually given in one or two sentences. Now I remember why I voted for him in the first term. This view from Regan was diametrically opposed to what the Rinos and majority have been trained to think by contemporary conservatism. I've seen this in his first term up until the assaination attempt with Brady. Next you see is the Brady bunch bill NRA con-servatism. We were conned into paying the NRA and voting for our own demise.
Thanks for the clip. This was the Ron Regan that I supported.
If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle.