24hourcampfire.com
24hourcampfire.com
-->
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
B
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
B
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 18,994
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Originally Posted by SPQR70AD
the right has been losing every big social issue for 45 years. can anyone tell what victories any "conservatives" won in the SC for the last 50 years?
G.W. Bush vs Gore. The SC stopped illegal recounts in FL.


Wikipedia: District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.
It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense or if the right was intended for state militias.


Leo of the Land of Dyr

NRA FOR LIFE

I MISS SARAH

“In Trump We Trust.” Right????

SOMEBODY please tell TRH that Netanyahu NEVER said "Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away."













Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,301
Likes: 8
S
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,301
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by JakeBlues
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
There's a big difference between, saying there should be no nominee vote for the SCOTUS, compared to a no vote for a SCOTUS nominee. I can't see Collins voting against a woman. A woman has cause a lot men to do things they ordinarily wouldn't.

Exactly. This doesn't matter. Put up a nominee, whether they like it or not. And then, makes them explain why the nominee isn't qualified. They can't.

They are not going to explain why the nominee is not qualified, in fact they are prolly going to say something like, "Although XXXX is highly qualified, I cannot in good conscience vote in favor of the nominee in an election year".

Leaving the court in a disastrous 4-4 split.


Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 2
S
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
S
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 2
I'm sure that flake Mittens will join the revolt.
It is really smart for Trump to pick a female and a mommy. Because the Libs have to play identity politics, she is automatically protected from most of the garbage that would be thrown at a man.
I even heard last night on the Judge Jeanine show that they are considering a Florida gal whose parents came over from Cuba. That punches all the right boxes, female and minority. That gal would just about be untouchable according to Liberal thinking.

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,301
Likes: 8
S
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,301
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Originally Posted by SPQR70AD
the right has been losing every big social issue for 45 years. can anyone tell what victories any "conservatives" won in the SC for the last 50 years?
G.W. Bush vs Gore. The SC stopped illegal recounts in FL.


Wikipedia: District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.
It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense or if the right was intended for state militias.



McDonald v. Chicago, 561 U.S. 742 (2010), is a landmark[1] decision of the Supreme Court of the United States that found that the right of an individual to "keep and bear arms," as protected under the Second Amendment, is incorporated by either the Due Process Clause or Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and is thereby enforceable against the states. The decision cleared up the uncertainty left in the wake of District of Columbia v. Heller as to the scope of gun rights in regard to the states.


Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,092
N
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
N
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 8,092
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
There's a big difference between, saying there should be no nominee vote for the SCOTUS, compared to a no vote for a SCOTUS nominee. I can't see Collins voting against a woman. A woman has cause a lot men to do things they ordinarily wouldn't.


This. Make Collins and the rest vote against a woman, or merely respond present to the roll call which would be tantamount to a no.


“Factio democratica delenda est"
IC B2

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,159
C
Campfire Tracker
Offline
Campfire Tracker
C
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,159
Originally Posted by rockinbbar
Originally Posted by deflave
It doesn’t matter because Trump is gonna win and pick whoever he wants regardless.



I hope.

The replacement of Ginsburg was going to be a total schidtshow meltdown under any circumstances at any time.

It's already started; there were a 100 "protestors" at McConnell's house in Kentucky last night. You have to give this to the anarchist's; they are proactive.

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,239
C
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
C
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,239
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by JakeBlues
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
There's a big difference between, saying there should be no nominee vote for the SCOTUS, compared to a no vote for a SCOTUS nominee. I can't see Collins voting against a woman. A woman has cause a lot men to do things they ordinarily wouldn't.

Exactly. This doesn't matter. Put up a nominee, whether they like it or not. And then, makes them explain why the nominee isn't qualified. They can't.

They are not going to explain why the nominee is not qualified, in fact they are prolly going to say something like, "Although XXXX is highly qualified, I cannot in good conscience vote in favor of the nominee in an election year".

Leaving the court in a disastrous 4-4 split.



Think this sums it up.


"Put none but Americans on guard tonight."
-George Washington
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,647
Likes: 1
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 23,647
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by deflave
It doesn’t matter because Trump is gonna win and pick whoever he wants regardless.



Likely but not a sure thing when the election becomes contested as it most certainly will be.

Get the SCOTUS position filled now............a bird in the hand thought process.

MM

Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 21,860
Likes: 10
C
Campfire Ranger
Online Content
Campfire Ranger
C
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 21,860
Likes: 10
Quick Poll:

Do Senators have?:

A) Two balls

B) One ball

C) Zero balls

* substitute ovaries for balls as gender warrants


If you are not actively engaging EVERY enemy you encounter... you are allowing another to fight for you... and that is cowardice... plain and simple.



Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 67,215
Likes: 41
Campfire Kahuna
Offline
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 67,215
Likes: 41
No praises for collins at all but she did come through at the last hour on Kavanaugh. She just wanted everyone to point the cameras at her.

Could be playing the same game, to let her own 50% welfarite constituency in maine know who she is.

IC B3

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,301
Likes: 8
S
Campfire 'Bwana
OP Online Content
Campfire 'Bwana
S
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 34,301
Likes: 8
Originally Posted by CashisKing
Quick Poll:

Do Senators have?:

A) Two balls

B) One ball

C) Zero balls

* substitute ovaries for balls as gender warrants

Apparently Graham has a set on this issue, but his are covered in his boyfriends poop.


Give a man a fish and he eats for a day. Give a man a welfare check, a forty ounce malt liquor, a crack pipe, an Obama phone, free health insurance. and some Air Jordan's and he votes Democrat for a lifetime.
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 10,683
Campfire Outfitter
Offline
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 10,683
Originally Posted by steve4102
Originally Posted by JakeBlues
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
There's a big difference between, saying there should be no nominee vote for the SCOTUS, compared to a no vote for a SCOTUS nominee. I can't see Collins voting against a woman. A woman has cause a lot men to do things they ordinarily wouldn't.

Exactly. This doesn't matter. Put up a nominee, whether they like it or not. And then, makes them explain why the nominee isn't qualified. They can't.

They are not going to explain why the nominee is not qualified, in fact they are prolly going to say something like, "Although XXXX is highly qualified, I cannot in good conscience vote in favor of the nominee in an election year".

Leaving the court in a disastrous 4-4 split.

I think they will cave. They're all high and mighty now. Put a candidate in front of them and make them vote no because of timing when the person in front of them is fully qualified. I think instead of your quote above, they will break down and say something like "although I don't agree with the timing of these proceedings, this candidate is nominated and fully qualified..." Once the nominee is on the Senate floor, their issues with the timing are moot.


Progressives are the most open minded, tolerant, and inclusive people on the planet, as long as you agree with everything they say, and do exactly as you're told.
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 16,103
Likes: 2
G
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
G
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 16,103
Likes: 2
I predict Rand Paul will be the one of pee on the campfire. Hope I’m wrong.

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 1
A
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
A
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,162
Likes: 1
The democrates have 47, and the republicans have 53

If Collins, Murkowski and Romney all refuse to vote yes and are afraid to vote no, so they vote "Present", it's still 50 to 47.

Is that not a win ?

Even if they all vote no, it's 50/50 and the V.P. breaks the tie, 51 to 50, we win.


MOLON LABE
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 1,294
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 1,294
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Originally Posted by SPQR70AD
the right has been losing every big social issue for 45 years. can anyone tell what victories any "conservatives" won in the SC for the last 50 years?
G.W. Bush vs Gore. The SC stopped illegal recounts in FL.

george "magog bush is a liberal democrat warmonger. Bill Clinton who I detested was 1000 times more conservative. gw bush voted for hillary clinton so the left won again when bush was installed in the white house

Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 1,294
S
Campfire Regular
Offline
Campfire Regular
S
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 1,294
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Originally Posted by SPQR70AD
the right has been losing every big social issue for 45 years. can anyone tell what victories any "conservatives" won in the SC for the last 50 years?
G.W. Bush vs Gore. The SC stopped illegal recounts in FL.


Wikipedia: District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.
It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense or if the right was intended for state militias.


means nothing. the states do what they want and ban mags semi autos buying ammo thru the mail background check for ammo etc. another "win" for the right

Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
J
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
J
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 19,179
I haven't seen much evidence that Collins has an IQ above 25.

Ever LISTEN to her talk ?


jwall- *** 3100 guy***

A Flat Trajectory is Never a Handicap

Speed is Trajectory's Friend !!
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 2
S
Campfire Outfitter
Online Content
Campfire Outfitter
S
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 14,259
Likes: 2
Collins sounds like she went non compos mentis with the Alzheimers about 3 years ago.

Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 17
Campfire Tracker
Online Content
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jul 2020
Posts: 5,286
Likes: 17
Originally Posted by BOWSINGER
Originally Posted by Rock Chuck
Originally Posted by SPQR70AD
the right has been losing every big social issue for 45 years. can anyone tell what victories any "conservatives" won in the SC for the last 50 years?
G.W. Bush vs Gore. The SC stopped illegal recounts in FL.


Wikipedia: District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), was a landmark decision of the US Supreme Court ruling that the Second Amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, unconnected with service in a militia, for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home, and that the District of Columbia's handgun ban and requirement that lawfully owned rifles and shotguns be kept "unloaded and disassembled or bound by a trigger lock" violated this guarantee.
It also stated that the right to bear arms is not unlimited and that guns and gun ownership would continue to be regulated. It was the first Supreme Court case to decide whether the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms for self-defense or if the right was intended for state militias.




Am I the ONLY one who sees the "Heller" decision for the horrible crap that it is??? With their emphasis on "in the home"... and that continued regulation was just fine and dandy?

Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,411
O
Campfire Ranger
Offline
Campfire Ranger
O
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 28,411
Originally Posted by TrueGrit
There's a big difference between, saying there should be no nominee vote for the SCOTUS, compared to a no vote for a SCOTUS nominee. I can't see Collins voting against a woman. A woman has cause a lot men to do things they ordinarily wouldn't.


Abstaining, if Collins does, is the same as NO.

Murkowski had no problem doing a kill shot right out of the box.


The degree of my privacy is no business of yours.

What we've learned from history is that we haven't learned from it.
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  RickBin 

Link Copied to Clipboard
AX24

539 members (1936M71, 1Akshooter, 12344mag, 1beaver_shooter, 007FJ, 1OntarioJim, 57 invisible), 2,393 guests, and 850 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Forum Statistics
Forums81
Topics1,192,803
Posts18,496,365
Members73,977
Most Online11,491
Jul 7th, 2023


 


Fish & Game Departments | Solunar Tables | Mission Statement | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | DMCA
Hunting | Fishing | Camping | Backpacking | Reloading | Campfire Forums | Gear Shop
Copyright © 2000-2024 24hourcampfire.com, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5
(Release build 20201027)
Responsive Width:

PHP: 7.3.33 Page Time: 0.132s Queries: 55 (0.018s) Memory: 0.9139 MB (Peak: 1.0365 MB) Data Comp: Zlib Server Time: 2024-05-07 21:24:03 UTC
Valid HTML 5 and Valid CSS