|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,364
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,364 |
Another amazingly thorough article from MD ! Is that ‘53 Fwt 308 built your year & month of birth ? 🥴
Makes me want to rebarrel my SA STS Classic to the Bob or better Bob .
What twist for the new .25 bullets ? Or is that strictly a LA proposition ?
History May Not Repeat, But it Rhymes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29 |
I was born in December of 1952, so no. But I did once own a Model 94 carbine in .32 Special that left the factory in my birth-month!
I haven't yet fooled with any .25-caliber bullets that require a twist faster than 1:10, and probably won't. Any lead-cores up to 120 grains do fine, and even the 115-grain TSX is designed to stabilize in a 10 twist.
Glad you liked the article!
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,364
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,364 |
Just skimmed it for the first pass ! I like to re-read for better retention. I don’t have any 1/4 bores, but I’m watching the trend towards longer bullets and tighter twists with some skepticism. If people try them in a 10” and they fail, what response are they going to get?
History May Not Repeat, But it Rhymes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29 |
Not much, which is one reason very few .25-caliber bullets that require a faster twist than 1:10 have been introduced.
The other reason is that so many 6mm and 6.5mm barrels (including those on very "affordable" factory rifles) have faster twists for longer, heavier bullets there's really no point in fast-twist .25 barrels, unless somebody just likes to shovel sand against the tide.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531 |
Not much, which is one reason very few .25-caliber bullets that require a faster twist than 1:10 have been introduced.
The other reason is that so many 6mm and 6.5mm barrels (including those on very "affordable" factory rifles) have faster twists for longer, heavier bullets there's really no point in fast-twist .25 barrels, unless somebody just likes to shovel sand against the tide. . Not much, which is one reason very few .25-caliber bullets that require a faster twist than 1:10 have been introduced.
The other reason is that so many 6mm and 6.5mm barrels (including those on very "affordable" factory rifles) have faster twists for longer, heavier bullets there's really no point in fast-twist .25 barrels, unless somebody just likes to shovel sand against the tide. I had a .250 Savage and a .257 Improved built a few years back but I use nothing heavier than 115-120 grain bullets in eithere I had Krieger build the .250s barrel with a 1:9 twist barrel but the .257 has a 1:10 twist barrel. both stabilize 115-117 grain bullets but not sure if the .257 will handle 120s or not. I really don't know if I care or not because it kills just fine for what I built it for with 115 grain NBTs.
What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29 |
Filaman,
Yes, the 1:10 .257 will handle 120s very well.
About the longest 120-grain made is the Nosler Partition, at 1.175 inches. Have never had any trouble getting them to shoot well in any 1:10 .257 Roberts.
You might want to try using a good twist/stability program before assuming so much. The Berger program gives the 120 Partition at 2900 fps a stability rating of 1.42 in standard conditions (59 degrees F. at sea level), which is pretty tough for stabilizing. At higher elevations, such as my part of Montana (4000' minimum) the rating is 1.56 at 35 degrees. At a rating of 1.0 bullets will stabilize, but 1.5 is considered VERY stable. Obviously the 120 Partition is stable in a 1:10 in almost any conditions.
The 115 Barnes is a little longer, and has a lower BC of .335. But even then it's stable under standard conditions, and at 35 F. and 4000' gets a rating of 1.33.
Over the past 2-3 years I've had a hard time understanding understand why so many people assume that the standard 1:10 twist in .25-caliber rifles isn't enough for standard .25 caliber bullets these days. But believe I am finally getting it: Apparently 1:8 is the Magic Rifling Twist for any cartridge these days, no matter the caliber. Well, here's the deal: A "fast" (or "slow") twist is in proportion to the caliber of the rifle, the bore/groove diameter. Thus a larger caliber doesn't require as fast a twist to stabilize even long, heavy bullets, the reason the standard 1:10 twist in .30 calibers will stabilize a very long 210-230 grain spitzer boattail. It's also why the standard 1:14 twist in 9.3mm will stabilize even 286-grain monolithic bullets. Which is also why a 1:7 (or 1:6 or 1:5.5) twist is necessary in .224-caliber rifles to stabilize many of today's heavier, longer bullets.
Also, one thing you might discover when using such programs (which have proven to be very accurate) velocity has FAR less effect on bullet stability than most shooters believe.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,364
Campfire Regular
|
OP
Campfire Regular
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,364 |
Not much, which is one reason very few .25-caliber bullets that require a faster twist than 1:10 have been introduced.
The other reason is that so many 6mm and 6.5mm barrels (including those on very "affordable" factory rifles) have faster twists for longer, heavier bullets there's really no point in fast-twist .25 barrels, unless somebody just likes to shovel sand against the tide. Very succinct, “ likes to shovel sand against the tide” 👍 My next question, is where do the heavy / long 270 bullets sit ? Another caliber with a traditional 10” twist Why swim against the tide when 6.5 and 7 mm have established the quicker twist standard. I don’t believe there’s much to be gained within reasonable hunting ranges.
History May Not Repeat, But it Rhymes.
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,939 Likes: 5
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 4,939 Likes: 5 |
John, I have owned several .257 Roberts but not a lot of killing experience with them. My question is... which bullet seems more effective on game: 120 Partition, 100 Hornady Interlock SP, or the 100 gr TTSX?
PS: in your Rifle Mag article you state that Winchester never offered the .257 Roberts in a Featherweight. I owned a M70 XTR Featherweight built in the ‘80’s.
Last edited by WAM; 09/25/20.
Life Member NRA, RMEF, American Legion, MAGA. Not necessarily in that order.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,531 |
Thanks Mule Deer. When I had the .250 built I had several So Called Experts telling me I needed a 1:9 to stabilize 120s and at the time I had planned the .250 around them. But when I shot some I wasn't impressed with the MV so I tried 117s and 115s and was much happier with their performance, especially the 115s. Then when I used them on game I saw I was correct in using the some what lighter bullets. So when I had the .257 built I went with a 1:10 due to my experience with the .250 and 115 and 117 grain bullets.
Last edited by Filaman; 09/25/20.
What goes up must come down, what goes around comes around, there's no free lunch. Trump's comin' back, get over it!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,385 Likes: 3
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,385 Likes: 3 |
Thus a larger caliber doesn't require as fast a twist to stabilize even long, heavy bullets, the reason the standard 1:10 twist in .30 calibers will stabilize a very long 210-230 grain spitzer boattail.
Also, one thing you might discover when using such programs (which have proven to be very accurate) velocity has FAR less effect on bullet stability than most shooters believe.
That seems to be the case with those old black powder cartridges with the big bore, long heavy bullets with a twist of 1/22-1/38.
I was thinking the other day how much I used to hate Bill Clinton. He was freaking George Washington compared to what they are now.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 580
Campfire Regular
|
Campfire Regular
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 580 |
115-grain TSX is designed to stabilize in a 10 twist. Barnes claims a 1-in-9" twist is required.
Jackie Treehorn: Treats objects like women. Montana uses Ruger actions.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,203 Likes: 6
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 7,203 Likes: 6 |
I have a gain twist which finishes at 1 in twelve and shoots the 120 Speer very well. It's not a particularly long bullet though. GD
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,905 Likes: 13
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 44,905 Likes: 13 |
If I were to build then I'd have the choice so I'd go 9" instead of 10". For my purposes there's no downside to a bit more twist.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29 |
John, I have owned several .257 Roberts but not a lot of killing experience with them. My question is... which bullet seems more effective on game: 120 Partition, 100 Hornady Interlock SP, or the 100 gr TTSX?
PS: in your Rifle Mag article you state that Winchester never offered the .257 Roberts in a Featherweight. I owned a M70 XTR Featherweight built in the ‘80’s. They never chambered the .257 Roberts in the pre-'64 Featherweight, and the article was about pre-'64s.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29 |
115-grain TSX is designed to stabilize in a 10 twist. Barnes claims a 1-in-9" twist is required. I have discussed this before. When bullet makers list a particular twist on their website, or a box of bullets, it's because they're afraid somewhere, sometime a customer will shoot in "conditions" where a bullet might not stabilize--say when hunting below zero along the shoreline of the Arctic Ocean for caribou. It does not mean that a slower twist won't work fine for all other conditions. A good example is the .270-caliber 170-grain Berger EOL Elite Hunter. It has shot very accurately in two different 1:10 twist .270 Winchesters here where I live in Montana--and the two ranges I use are on the valley floor, 4000 feet above sea level--where its stability rating according to the Berger program is over 1.3, quite a way above the 1.0 minimum. It would be even more stable when hunting at elevations up to 9000 feet in the mountains above the valley--and according to Berger's own stability problem is "marginally stable" even in standard conditions of 59 Fahrenheit at sea level. Yet Berger suggests a 1:8 twist. This is NOT just to stabilize the bullet, but to maximize ballistic coeffcient--which tops out at a 1.5 rating. With the 170-grain .270 bullet, shooting it at 2750 fps at 4000 feet reduces the bullet's "maximum" G7 BC of .339 to .323. Big deal.
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 12,422 Likes: 4
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 12,422 Likes: 4 |
I wonder? Just what twist rate did Winchester use in those mid 80's.257 Robt. XTR Featherweights? I haven't been able to the 120 gr. Speer to shoot worth spit in mine. Paul B.
Our forefathers did not politely protest the British.They did not vote them out of office, nor did they impeach the king,march on the capitol or ask permission for their rights. ----------------They just shot them. MOLON LABE
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,684 Likes: 5
Campfire Tracker
|
Campfire Tracker
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,684 Likes: 5 |
December 52? I beat you by 7 months :-)
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,611
Campfire Outfitter
|
Campfire Outfitter
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 9,611 |
I beat him by 12...December of '51. What day John? Mine was on the 20th. powdr
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29
Campfire Kahuna
|
Campfire Kahuna
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 60,236 Likes: 29 |
“Montana seems to me to be what a small boy would think Texas is like from hearing Texans.” John Steinbeck
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,243 Likes: 2
Campfire 'Bwana
|
Campfire 'Bwana
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 32,243 Likes: 2 |
I wonder? Just what twist rate did Winchester use in those mid 80's.257 Robt. XTR Featherweights? I haven't been able to the 120 gr. Speer to shoot worth spit in mine. Paul B. I had 3 of them, ROT was 1-10". The only post-'64 .257" bore rifles that Winchester and Winchester/USRA cataloged with a slower ROT was the 1986/87 70 Lightweight Carbine in 250-3000 that the rifled at 1-14" for reasons that nobody has ever admitted to.
|
|
|
|
596 members (1234, 17CalFan, 160user, 10gaugeman, 10Glocks, 01Foreman400, 53 invisible),
2,455
guests, and
1,270
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums81
Topics1,194,340
Posts18,526,828
Members74,031
|
Most Online11,491 Jul 7th, 2023
|
|
|
|