Home Forums Hunting & Shooting Hunter's Campfire Supreme Court says agents may be held personally responsible

Agreed. And what about the Amish??? Pretty shady, if you ask me. Work all the time, must be off the grid, an utter lack of "diversity", religious meetings happen in German???? Fricken' Nazi separatist racist terrorists!

I agree. They should be "violated."

PoPo insurance about to get REAL expensive.

They should be prohibited entering into insurance contracts covering civil rights violations. They should pay 100% of any judgements involving such clear, blatant civil rights violations out of their own pockets.

Judgements would never get paid.

As long as it’s not directly subsidized with tax dollars, it’s just free market. Somebody will cover the nut.

Besides, after one massive payout, they’d never get covered again and wouldn’t be able to work as police.

Yes. The court has problems. When our country was established we did not have muzzys trying to behead Christians in the US. We also did not have people confused about their gender trying to use the opposite sexes bathroom.
But somehow this was found in the constitution. Hasbeen

So cops who violate peoples civil right would be off the force.

And how exactly is this a bad thing?

The goal would be for rights violators to not be able to work again as police.

I’m no Muslim fan but this is a good ruling. I’m hoping this can be extended to the governors who are violating our rights with lockdown decrees. Think of Newsom being personally sued into poverty by California churches and every state officer who enforced those decrees.

Ouch,

you mean................you just really mean.

This is about coercion and abuse of power, not religion. It just shows how these no due process secret lists are abused. Remember Obama wanted to suspend Second Amendment rights for anyone on the No Fly list.

Worship my God, or I'll cut your head off, is hardly a religion.

Yes. I mean really.

Another option I've floated is payments for civil rights violations come out of the department retirement plan, and the benefits of every officer in the department are reduced accordingly. Under such a system the police might actually start doing a better job of policing themselves.

It’s not. That was my point. After they become uninsurable they won’t work again. No dept would take on the liability of an uninsurable cop. Well, most anyway. I’m sure Seattle or Louisville would hire a tranny just because, but American cities and towns wouldn’t.

To be honest though, I am okay with violating some folks civil rights. Sometimes things need to happen outside of the law.

You just better not get caught or be on the popular side.

Civil rights will be an umbrella that'll extend protections for anything you or your lawyer can dream up.



Might as well remove all insurance liabilities for motorists as well. Let he with the best lawyer win.

There are no such things as "civil rights", first of all, but more importantly, these are Bill of Rights rights we're discussing, not "civil rights". So you are arguing that government should be immune to the limitations of the Constitution?

Use your brain much?

You ought to reread things and try a little harder.

BTW I said no such thing. Though I failed to quote MadMooner in my response, it was that line of convo to which I was responding.

Any attempt to explain it further would fly past your head.

Ask President Trump how he feels, or General Flynn.