Aside from the price is there any reason to consider another bullet for a “do it all” bullet for the 7mm-08?
Most of my hunting is done for white tails and I’ve been using 120 Ballistic Tips but was thinking the 140 grain partition might be a bit more versatile for other game as well as hold up a bit better than the Ballistic tips on close shots.
Was also considering the 140 Accubond but not sure if they will expand as well as the partition on shots that are 300 yards plus.
Probably overthinking this but would like to see what others with more experience with this round think.
When I started my career with the 7mm-08 I focused on the 140 Partition. 47.5 grains Big Game, WLRM primer, Remington brass, 2890 fps, little bitty groups. Killed antelope at 350, elk at 346, and deer to 541 yards. Nothing needed a second shot.
My dad’s rifle preferred the AccuBond. No antelope but elk at 225 and deer out to 475 yards.
Whichever shoots better but I prefer the Partition.
P
Obey lawful commands. Video interactions. Hold bad cops accountable. Problem solved.
I am an Accubond fan in the 7-08. I have killed whitetails from 5 to 300 yards with a 140 grain Accubond in my 7-08. No problems with expansion at any of those distances. I have yet to catch one, but every deer I hit with them died.
I am with Pharm. Whichever one shoots better, use it.
Aside from the price is there any reason to consider another bullet for a “do it all” bullet for the 7mm-08?
Thanks
No, there is not another reason to consider another “do it all” bullet. The partition is the definition of the do it all hunting bullet. Many powders will send that 140 partition 2,800-2,900 FPS, which will be highly affective.
The Partition is a GREAT bullet. It has been the "gold standard" for better than 60 years. My 7-08 really likes them. However, I have since started using Big Game powder.
"Pride is the only disease that makes everyone sick except the one that has it"
I,ll throw out one more choice. The 140grTrophy Bonded Tipped from Federal. In 2018 a 160gr Trophy Bonded Tipped out penetrated the 160gr Nosler Partition
in a moose at 240 yards both rifles were 7mm Mags. For deer I,d use the 140gr Accubond, or the 140gr Nosler Partition. The one I would pick is the one the rifle
shot best. For instance my 257 Roberts is not crazy about 110gr Accubonds but loves 115gr Nosler Partitions so when hunting I use the 115gr Partitions all the time.
For deer I would also look at the 130gr Speer and the 145gr Speer. My TIKKA likes the 130gr Speer better than any other bullet. Anyway take your pick.
I,ll throw out one more choice. The 140grTrophy Bonded Tipped from Federal. In 2018 a 160gr Trophy Bonded Tipped out penetrated the 160gr Nosler Partition
in a moose at 240 yards both rifles were 7mm Mags. For deer I,d use the 140gr Accubond, or the 140gr Nosler Partition. The one I would pick is the one the rifle
shot best. For instance my 257 Roberts is not crazy about 110gr Accubonds but loves 115gr Nosler Partitions so when hunting I use the 115gr Partitions all the time.
For deer I would also look at the 130gr Speer and the 145gr Speer. My TIKKA likes the 130gr Speer better than any other bullet. Anyway take your pick.
Have you shot deer with the 130 speer? If so, how do they hold up on closer range shots? Thanks
Aside from the price is there any reason to consider another bullet for a “do it all” bullet for the 7mm-08?
Most of my hunting is done for white tails and I’ve been using 120 Ballistic Tips but was thinking the 140 grain partition might be a bit more versatile for other game as well as hold up a bit better than the Ballistic tips on close shots.
Was also considering the 140 Accubond but not sure if they will expand as well as the partition on shots that are 300 yards plus.
Probably overthinking this but would like to see what others with more experience with this round think.
Thanks
If you are worried about Accubombs expanding, yes, you are overthinking it.
The Accubond is the modern version of the partition, for people not stuck in the 1960's.
Last edited by antelope_sniper; 01/26/21.
You didn't use logic or reason to get into this opinion, I cannot use logic or reason to get you out of it.
You cannot over estimate the unimportance of nearly everything. John Maxwell
Since you said "do it all" and not whitetail, I'll vote for the NPT too. When my wife got her Remington M7 in 7-08 I loaded the 140 NPT over H4350 and she set out to hunt. Since we move with the Army she has had the chance to kill whitetails, blacktails, hogs, antelope, caribou, black bear, and a moose. She put a second bullet in to a couple animals before they could fall but I think any of the shots she has taken would have been fatal. We did recover 1 of the 2 bullets from the moose, the first one passed through the lungs and the second was under the hide after passing thru on a quartering shot. Load it and shoot it with confidence.
Aside from the price is there any reason to consider another bullet for a “do it all” bullet for the 7mm-08?
Most of my hunting is done for white tails and I’ve been using 120 Ballistic Tips but was thinking the 140 grain partition might be a bit more versatile for other game as well as hold up a bit better than the Ballistic tips on close shots.
Was also considering the 140 Accubond but not sure if they will expand as well as the partition on shots that are 300 yards plus.
Probably overthinking this but would like to see what others with more experience with this round think.
Thanks
A 7mm-08 with 140 or 150 grain partitions is pretty hard to argue with. Same for 140 grain Accubonds. I would expect the accubond to expand farther downrange than the partition because the higher BC retains velocity better and the farther you are from the muzzle, the greater the difference gets. I would prefer the accubond over the partition past 300 yards .. closer I'd pick which ever is more accurate in my rifle. I have found the flat based bullets to be more accurate more often but no guarantees.
Tom
Anyone who thinks there's two sides to everything hasn't met a M�bius strip.
140 AB bc is .485. Partition is .434. The same load (47.5 gr Big Game) generates slightly (30 fps or so) less velocity in the AB compared to the PT. So here’s the math, velocity only: